News:
India to protect university patents
Posted by Alla Katsnelson
[Entry posted at 20th March 2008 04:53 PM GMT]

The Indian government is moving towards approving a law that will create a framework for universities to patent their discoveries.

Currently, ownership of innovations made through government-funded institutions belong to the Indian government, much like the situation in the US before the Baye-Dole Act was passed in 1980. That law stated that technologies developed with federal funding at a university belong to the institution. Its passing spurred universities to establish tech transfer offices to help researchers commercialize inventions; the number of patents shot up, as did venture funding for innovations developed at academic institutions.

The law now wending its way through Indian parliament is modeled closely after the Baye-Dole Act. According to Gregory Kalbaugh, who heads the life sciences working group of the U.S.-India Business Council within the US Chamber of Commerce, it would be a similar boon for India. "India graduates probably the second-largest number of PhDs in the world -- it's the place investors want to be," Kalbaugh said. But they stay away because under the current system it's unclear what role the private sector should play in an invention made by a government-funded institution. By resolving that question, a legal framework for university patenting would spur investors to forge university research collaborations.

"IP has always been a neglected aspect of Indian science (particularly the area of medical research) where pursuit of knowledge is always considered at par with act of worship," Akshay Anand, a professor of neurology at the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh, wrote in an Email to The Scientist. "As a result, even the best research in Indian science goes unpatented and even unpublished."

Because most Indian research is funded by the government, wrote Anand, there's been very little impetus to encourage patenting intellectual property, even though doing so would generate money for the institutions. But the new law could help change that by placing emphasis on the importance and value of patents.


For FREE access to this news story and more, you must register.

Not yet registered? Get free access
 

The article you are attempting to read is only available to registered users of The Scientist. Registration is FREE and only takes a few seconds.

 
 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Create your MyScientist account and access all of The Scientist's free content, tools and life science email newsletters, including:

 

> The current month’s print issue

> Daily & Bi-weekly e-mail newsletters

> Newsblogs with breaking headlines

> The Scientist Community

> Exclusive web extras

> The Scientist Careers

 

Premium content from The Scientist Archive, a comprehensive resource of over 22 years of past life science coverage, is available only by subscription. Subscribe today and get unlimited access

 

 
LATEST NEWS