News:
NIH report omits specific blame?
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 17th April 2008 09:08 PM GMT]
Comment on this news story   
Researchers at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences are saying the recent NIH report on mismanagement at the agency fails to pinpoint some root causes of the problems.

The report pointed out several problems at NIEHS, including a failure to consider conflicts of interest among NIEHS employees, a lack of documented justifications for out-of-rank-order extramural grant awards, and tarnished morale at the agency.

Ray Tennant, an NIEHS cancer researcher, said that report should have pointed more explicitly to specific problems with ex-NIEHS director David Schwartz's leadership of the agency. "How did this report deal with the manifold problems that were brought about in the Schwartz era?" asked NIEHS cancer researcher Ray Tennant. "It didn't. It glossed over them."

An NIEHS researcher who chose to remain anonymous said that not only Schwartz, but also NIH director Elias Zerhouni, who originally hired Schwartz, were the main causes of NIEHS's problems. According to the researcher, Zerhouni tacitly endorsed Schwartz's miscues. "I think [the report] was accurate when it was done, but I think the blame belongs on two people: Schwartz and Zerhouni."

The anonymous NIEHS researchers added that the report and the further inquiry being demanded by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who wants Zerhouni to address specific issues relating to Schwartz's actions as NIEHS director, may lead to more problems for the institute and the NIH as a whole. "My major concern about the report and Grassley's aggressive follow-up is that it's going to hurt not just NIEHS, but NIH now," the researcher said. "It would go away if Zerhouni stepped down, frankly."

An NIH spokesperson told me that the agency would be "completely responsive" to Grassley's requests regarding the report, which include providing comprehensive information on 45 extramural grants that NIEHS awarded to applications that were above the payline between FY 2005 and FY 2007. "We don't believe that the findings are representative of other institutes and centers," the spokesperson said, "but we certainly want to take every opportunity to learn and apply what we've learned when appropriate."

Tennant said that morale at the agency had gotten better since Schwartz's resignation earlier this year. The report gave the results of a satisfaction survey conducted among NIEHS employees last fall before Schwartz resigned. "I think there's been a definite change in morale over the past several months," he said. Since Schwartz's departure, NIEHS deputy director Samuel Wilson has been acting director.

For FREE access to this news story and more, you must register.

Not yet registered? Get free access
 

The article you are attempting to read is only available to registered users of The Scientist. Registration is FREE and only takes a few seconds.

 
 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Create your MyScientist account and access all of The Scientist's free content, tools and life science email newsletters, including:

 

> The current month’s print issue

> Daily & Bi-weekly e-mail newsletters

> Newsblogs with breaking headlines

> The Scientist Community

> Exclusive web extras

> The Scientist Careers

 

Premium content from The Scientist Archive, a comprehensive resource of over 22 years of past life science coverage, is available only by subscription. Subscribe today and get unlimited access

 

 
LATEST NEWS