News:
NIH funding increase stalled
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 26th June 2008 06:46 PM GMT]

A spending bill that would increase the National Institutes of Health 2009 budget by $1.2 billion over President Bush's proposed NIH budget was sidelined by partisan wrangling in the full House Committee on Appropriations today (June 26).

"[Bush's] budget would result in 6,000 medical research scientists who will no longer be able to get their research funded," said Representative David Obey (D-WI), who is the chair of the Appropriations Committee, in his opening remarks. "I don't believe members of this committee on either side of the aisle want to see this happen."

The NIH budget increase is part of a larger Labor, Health and Education bill which would restore several cuts or boost slight increases to federal education, healthcare, and energy assistance programs. The bill would increase spending by $8.2 billion over last year's bill and by $8 billion over Bush's Labor, Health and Education budget request for FY 2009.

The snafu in committee occurred when ranking member Jerry Lewis (R-CA) proposed tabling the Labor, Health, and Education appropriations bill and instead considering the Interior appropriations bill, which addresses the issue of skyrocketing energy prices by "offering relief at the pump." In urging the committee to defeat the amendment, Obey said, "It's stunts like this that make people hate Washington."

The bill must go through a final markup in the Appropriations Committee before heading to the House floor for a vote.

The committee adjourned after Lewis proposed the amendment and has not yet scheduled a time to reconsider the bill. "Mr. Obey does not put up with nonsense," an Appropriations Committee spokesperson said, when asked why the session had been adjourned.

A bill that would increase the FDA budget by $2.1 billion in the coming fiscal year faired better earlier this week when it was passed by the House Agriculture Subcommittee.

For FREE access to this news story and more, you must register.

Not yet registered? Get free access
 

The article you are attempting to read is only available to registered users of The Scientist. Registration is FREE and only takes a few seconds.

 
 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Create your MyScientist account and access all of The Scientist's free content, tools and life science email newsletters, including:

 

> The current month’s print issue

> Daily & Bi-weekly e-mail newsletters

> Newsblogs with breaking headlines

> The Scientist Community

> Exclusive web extras

> The Scientist Careers

 

Premium content from The Scientist Archive, a comprehensive resource of over 22 years of past life science coverage, is available only by subscription. Subscribe today and get unlimited access

 

 
LATEST NEWS