News:
Lancet retracts stem cell paper
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 5th September 2008 08:48 PM GMT]

UK-based medical journal The Lancet has retracted a paper reporting on a clinical trial of a stem cell therapy for urinary incontinence, which has been mired in allegations of misconduct.

In this week's issue of the journal, editors Sabine Kleinert and Richard Horton write that authors of an Austrian government inquiry "raise doubts as to whether a trial as described in The Lancet ever existed."

They also outline a slew of ethical problems uncovered during the investigation of the trial, such as irregularities with patient consent forms and the fact that the study did not attain the proper ethics approval.

"In our view, the conclusions of this official investigation pinpoint so many irregularities in the conduct of their work that, taken together, the paper should be retracted from the published record," they conclude.

The rector of the Medical University of Innsbruck, where the trial took place, first raised concerns about it last year, and was recently dismissed from his post because of the controversy.

An editorial appearing alongside the retraction points out that, as problems with the trial began surfacing, several of the Austrian paper's authors "sought to distance themselves from the paper." These included Georg Bartsch, head author on the paper and head of the urology department at the university, who previously told Nature that he was included as senior author "in honor of my seniority."

The editorial goes on to comment on the pervasiveness of such honorary author flight when misconduct charges are levied against published papers. "Clearly, journals asking for maximum transparency and requiring signed statements on contributions is not always enough to ensure that coauthors take responsibility for a study's integrity as well as basking in the glory of a high-profile publication with all its associated credit," the editorial states, referring to The Lancet's own contributorship policy. "Using gift authorship as an excuse for not taking responsibility for research when serious flaws are uncovered?should not be tolerated. With credit comes responsibility - always."

For FREE access to this news story and more, you must register.

Not yet registered? Get free access
 

The article you are attempting to read is only available to registered users of The Scientist. Registration is FREE and only takes a few seconds.

 
 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Create your MyScientist account and access all of The Scientist's free content, tools and life science email newsletters, including:

 

> The current month’s print issue

> Daily & Bi-weekly e-mail newsletters

> Newsblogs with breaking headlines

> The Scientist Community

> Exclusive web extras

> The Scientist Careers

 

Premium content from The Scientist Archive, a comprehensive resource of over 22 years of past life science coverage, is available only by subscription. Subscribe today and get unlimited access

 

 
LATEST NEWS