News:
Science scores in 2010 US budget
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 7th May 2009 10:29 PM GMT]

Overall, federal science fares well in President Barack Obama's recently announced FY2010 budget, but the National Institutes of Health would net a pretty paltry increase under the president's plan. In the proposal, the NIH stands to get slightly more than $30.8 billion in 2010. This would represent a $443 million, or 1.5%, bump over the NIH's 2009 budget.

Kathleen Sebelius, our newly crowned Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, delivered the news at a press conference today.

When asked by a reporter with Nature how that rather slim funding increase would play out when measured against the $10.4 billion the NIH got in the stimulus package, Sebelius said that the issue would become important...later.

"It's clear that we need to start foreshadowing what's going to happen in FY2011," Sebelius said. The NIH must spend all that stimulus cash in two years, and has just received its first avalanche of grant applications in hopes of getting $200 million in "Challenge Grant" money out the door by the end of FY2010. "We certainly need to begin working on what happens in 2011 and 2012," Sebelius, flanked by several directors and acting directors of HHS agencies, added.

Other science agencies make out a little better than the NIH in Obama's 2010 budget proposal. The Food and Drug Administration would get $511 million, its largest increase ever, under the president's plan. The Centers for Disease Control would get about $6.4 billion in 2010. The Department of Energy's Office of Science would get about $1.6 billion. And the National Science Foundation would get a whopping 16% increase with a $7 billion 2010 budget. The $3.6 trillion budget now moves on to Congress, where legislators will debate its finer points, make revisions, and return it to the president.

Correction (May 12): The figure given for CDC's proposed 2010 budget in the original version of this story was incorrect. The figure has been changed to reflect correct amount indicated in the president's budget. The Scientist regrets the error.


Related stories:
  • Life science scores in 2010 budget
    [26th February 2009]
  • New NIH head talks budget, priorities
    [10th November 2008]

  • For FREE access to this news story and more, you must register.

    Not yet registered? Get free access
     

    The article you are attempting to read is only available to registered users of The Scientist. Registration is FREE and only takes a few seconds.

     
     

    Email

    Password

    > Forgot Password?
    > FAQ
    > Subscribe

     
    Not yet registered? Get free access
     

    Create your MyScientist account and access all of The Scientist's free content, tools and life science email newsletters, including:

     

    > The current month’s print issue

    > Daily & Bi-weekly e-mail newsletters

    > Newsblogs with breaking headlines

    > The Scientist Community

    > Exclusive web extras

    > The Scientist Careers

     

    Premium content from The Scientist Archive, a comprehensive resource of over 22 years of past life science coverage, is available only by subscription. Subscribe today and get unlimited access

     

     
    LATEST NEWS