|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Autism, in its early days
Posted by Alison McCook [Entry posted at 25th February 2008 09:23 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Return to Top comment: Relationships by Richard Knight [Comment posted 2008-03-01 00:31:32] It was interesting to note that the increase of alcoholism has been looked. Of all of the children that I know with aspergers, alcohol intake was not a problem with the mother. What was common was that they all had taken birth control pills prior to conception and did not wait the recommended one year before getting pregnant. Has the increased use of birth control pills equalled the increase of autism? Return to Top comment: Could alcohol cause Aspergers? by null null [Comment posted 2008-02-28 03:24:16] Aspergers sydrome has similarities with mild autism, and in the UK sufferers are more apparent than previously. We currently have 4 sufferers in undrgraduate biology classes. With our specialist psychologist, I was questioning a possible link with foetal alcohol syndrome, which also has some similar symptoms. The increase in lung cancer in women correlates with an increase in smoking since the 1950s when it was uncommon. There appears to have been a similar incease in alcohol consumption. In the 1950s drunkenness was a male preserve but now a binge drinking culture in 15-25 year olds including females is making headlines in the UK. Has anyone looked at a possible connection between mothers alcohol consumption (or consumption of any other psychoactive drug, prescription or otherwise) while pregnant and the mental health of her offspring? The hypothesis is that some cases of Aspergers and possibly autism are a type of foetal alcohol syndrome dependent on the extent, timing and duration of exposure. A downside would be guilt trips for mothers if findings were positive, but ignorance is not bliss either.
Hugh Fletcher Return to Top comment: Autism rates: Ascertainment versus true increase in prevalence? by null null [Comment posted 2008-02-26 14:06:19] One repeatedly finds references to "increasing rates of autism?. An objective review of the literature finds little support that the rates of autism are actually increasing. I think given the increasing awareness of the autism spectrum disorders that the increased focus on autism is more likely attributable to an increase awareness and ascertainment of the disease. Indeed, large epidemiologic studies conducted to examine the hypothetical link between autism and certain childhood vaccinations find no increase in autism rates over time and no evidence for a link to the MMR vaccine or thimerasol. Indeed the Madsen et al study (NEJM 2002) and the Madsen et al study in Pediatrics (2003) simply do not support claims of an increase in autism prevalence at least in a large Danish population.
In terms of understanding the likely complex etiology of autism, this distinction is important. If the ascertainment of autism is increased, then research should not focus on ?novel? environmental factors. It may be that in certain populations the prevalence of autism is increasing, but until this is backed up with solid epidemiologic data, it is inappropriate to make such claims. As Arlis Howard has said ?When the myth becomes fact, they publish the myth?. In science we do ourselves a disservice by perpetuating myths even if they may ultimately prove to have some basis in reality. Todd E. Golde MD PhD Chair, Professor and Consultant Department of Neuroscience Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Birdsall 210 4500 San Pablo Rd Jacksonville, FL 32224 Phone 904-953-2538 Fax 904-953-7370 email tgolde@mayo.edu Comment on this blog |