The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: Texas profs sue university
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
Texas profs sue university
Posted by Elie Dolgin
[Entry posted at 2nd December 2008 09:58 PM GMT]

An association representing faculty members at 85 University of Texas institutions is suing university officials on behalf of more than 3,000 University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) employees given the pink slip last week in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike.

"[The University of Texas officials] had a predetermined agenda that had nothing to do with Ike" that included efforts to privatize universities and weaken the tenure process, Tom Johnson, executive director of the Texas Faculty Association (TFA), told The Scientist.

Galveston attorney Joe Jaworski filed a lawsuit today (Dec. 2) alleging that the nine members of the University of Texas Board of Regents, under advice from the University of Texas System leadership, violated the Texas Open Meetings Act when they held closed-door meetings and conference calls ahead of their November 12 announcement of mass layoffs at UTMB in Galveston.

Johnson also implicated Kenneth Shine, interim chancellor of the UT system, David Callender, the UTMB president, and Governor Rick Perry's office in the backroom decision, although they were not formally accused in the suit.

Among the 127 faculty members laid off last week, 83 were tenured or tenure-track faculty, according to the full list of fired faculty, obtained by the Galveston County Daily News under the Texas Public Information Act.

"Tenure is increasingly becoming worthless in the UT system," George Reamy, a TFA faculty advisor, told The Scientist.

He and Johnson stressed that the recent firings are part of a long history of attacking the tenure process and efforts to move the medical school away from Galveston Island to be closer to wealthier consumers of private health care from the Houston area.

"They want flexibility to privatize and do what they want," said Johnson. "That agenda is amoral and flat out wrong."

William New, UTMB's associate dean for research administration, countered that "not that many" researchers have been fired compared to hospital staff. "The university has gone out of its way to protect its research enterprise," he told The Scientist.

"I'm not saying it's a good decision; I'm saying it's the best decision we could make given the options," New added. "The rationale is to cut deep, cut once, and get it over with."

But this wasn't the only big round of cuts, noted Reamy. In 2006, hundreds of UTMB staff were laid off, and many others received significant salary cuts.

Reamy cited a June 22, 2006, e-mail message that the TFA obtained under the Texas Public Information Act in which Valerie Parisi, then dean of the UTMB School of Medicine, wrote that the medical school had "not really identified any appropriate strategy for us to reduce tenured faculty except for reducing salary."

Johnson noted that most Texas researchers, even tenured professors, are under short-term fixed contracts, and that under Texas law, academic tenure is defined as a property right separate from benefits and salaries. He accused the UT system of undermining the tenure process through a continued assault on researchers' paychecks, in addition to the layoffs.

The recent layoffs were effective immediately, although non-tenure track faculty will be paid for six months, while tenured and tenure-track faculty will receive support through August 2009, said New. Individual faculty could consult their department heads if they wanted to continue working for the academic year, he added.

Related stories:

  • Texas med center to lay off 3,800 [13th November 2008]
  • The Importance of a Plan B [May 2008]
  • Rebuilding research after Katrina [March 2008]

    Correction (Dec. 3): In an earlier version of this article George Reamy's last name was spelled incorrectly. The Scientist regrets the error.

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 4.71/5 (24 votes )





    different storm, same disaster
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2008-12-17 12:34:01]
    The situation at UTMB is very much like what happened to institutions of higher learning in New Orleans post-Katrina. Faculty, irregardless of tenure status, were dismissed and academic programs were dismantled all due to financial hardships.

    For the medical schools, destroyed clinics and hospitals (coupled with a loss of patients), meant a huge drop in income. The school honestly could not make payroll (it took federal assistance to make ends meet). Much of the decision-making in who got the proverbial axe was done in secret and behind closed doors. In some cases, faculty in exile didn't become aware of their dismissal until they summarily lost their e-mail accounts and benefits.

    The outcome of all of this bloodletting? Star faculty (i.e., those with lots of external funding, prestigious in their fields, etc) left the state of Louisiana for greener pastures. The deadweights were effectively pruned (i.e., tenured faculty who drew salaries and benefits but contributed little to nothing to the institution). The faculty (both tenured and non-tenured) who remained (neither stars or deadweight) were left behind to re-build under very stressful conditions. To these survivors, tenure means nothing.

    The UTMB faculty have to face a harsh reality. If you cannot prove yourself as a valuable member of the UTMB family (by teaching, getting grants, etc), its the end of the line for you and you cannot hide behind your tenure status.



    Tenure a double edge sword
    by Peter HIbbard

    [Comment posted 2008-12-07 11:29:52]
    Tenure was intended to protect free speech in an academic community. Over time, it has done two things: it protects the incompetent, and it protects the dreamers who do not go along with the status quo. One blogger call them the irritants. I was threatened with dismissal when I resisted changing the grade of the son of an administrator. I was protected by tenure. Without this protection, grades would become more inflated and meaningless. I also worked with a teacher who reminded me of Ditto, from the movie "Teachers". He did nothing for his students except worksheets. Friday was movie day, with snacks. Movies didn't have to have any relationship to his subject. Tenure needs to be modified to strengthen the position of good teachers and researchers, and clarifying causes and mechanisms for dismissal. It cannot remain as it is without weakening education, and it cannot be eliminated without destroying academic integrity



    Another Hurricane, Same old story
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2008-12-03 13:09:40]
    From the outside, it looks like the same thing that happened in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina when The Tulane Medical School was desimated by firings of tenured professors.



    Same old University of Texas politics
    by Chet Cooper

    [Comment posted 2008-12-03 12:53:32]
    Having been previously employed by UTMB and a former victim of their so-called moves of economic necessity, this action does not really surprise me. Looking at the list of folks being dumped, I personally know many of them, most of whom are very nice people and productive (at least when I was at UTMB). A few are near retirement age and may be accepting this action more graciously than others. However, I know others on the list who are/were considered by administrators to be non-productive and/or irritants. It seems that the leadership of UTMB has finally found what they feel is justification for getting rid of them.



    Comment on this blog