The Scientist : NewsBlog Print: China gunning for brain gain
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
China gunning for brain gain
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 21st January 2009 03:49 PM GMT]

A scientific organization in the world's most populous nation is trying to lure foreign researchers to work on short-term contracts within its borders with offers of robust funding.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) announced last week that it will be offering outstanding foreign scientists funding that "will be higher than their research funding outside China," according to the chief of the CAS's international cooperation bureau Lv Yonglong, who was quoted by SciDev.Net.

The CAS is introducing two new programs: Specially Hired Foreign Research Fellows to attract foreign associate professors, and the Youth Foreign Scientist Project, for newly minted PhDs. Fellows will go to China for research collaborations lasting from three to six months, while young scientists can spend up to two years in China. The CAS hopes to attract about 200 foreign scientists per year and approximately 1,500 scientists in total. The CAS did not disclose exact funding amounts or the effort's total budget. "With this new talent project, China expects to break technological bottle-necks and enhance its research abilities and Sci-tech levels in the least time," the CAS said in a statement.

The Academy is also seeking to entice about 600 Chinese scientists working abroad to return to their country annually. Repatriating Chinese researchers and technicians will receive yearly funding in excess of $397,058, the amount the CAS offered returning scientists under a previous program.

Last week, the CAS also awarded three foreign scientists--president of the Japan Science Foundation Arima Akito, University of California at Berkeley physicist Yuen-Ron Shen, and Michel Che, a chemical engineer at Pierre and Marie Curie University in Paris--with the "2008 CAS Award for International Scientific Cooperation."


Related stories:
  • Science goes to China
    [May 2007]
  • China science chief speaks out
    [29th April 2005]

  •  

    Rate this article

    Rating: 4.27/5 (11 votes )





    Not that scary...
    by Andrew Sun

    [Comment posted 2009-01-24 04:12:03]
    Truth of the Nature is much less harmful to Chinese political ideology than in the western society where Catholic power is still prevailing. In China one has no ethical burden to conduct embryonic stem cells or GM-crop research. There is no unnecessary additional paragraphs after texts of evolution theory in our biology textbooks. We dare to discuss whether to give up traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which is much more important than 'alternative' for Chinese people. Here, we censor FOR science, not against science. Maybe these may one day go to an extreme that can hinder the freedom of scientific finding (e.g. by too easily tagging an idea with 'pseudoscience'), but currently China can provide a different environment of scientific career from the western society.

    The true illness in science infrastructure of China is rather the imperfect rules and 'manipulated'/'handled' process of fund distribution among scientists. However, 'dear foreign scholars' can only be the beneficiaries in this kind of unbalanced situation, if you don't feel ethically guilty.




    At least China can make good shoes...
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-01-21 23:31:08]
    In reply to the post below, China may still be behind the West in science and technology, but can you blame it for trying to catch up in earnest by attracting talents from outside, especially when it can now afford to? As for freedom of speech, let's not exaggerate the importance of it in science or its degree of extent in the West, including in America. Censorship in politics does not equate to censorship in science, especially when there's no threat to the political establishment. When Russia was governed by communism, it still allowed enough scientific freedom and supports to produce world-class scientists, some of whom even won the Nobel Prizes. I also know from my own personal experience that freedom of expression is sometimes heavily discouraged or curtailed within an American lab by the power-mongering PI's or others with clouts, to quell any dissent to their opinions on scientific or even social matters. You know better than to depict the West as where anything goes in freedom of expression, as practiced in reality. And perhaps a good number of bright and hard-working Chinese expatriate scientists would look forward to returning to China where they will be treated with genuine respect and rewards they deserve, rather than continuously be exploited as cheap imported labor to do most of the difficult or grunt works at the labs in "free" West.



    Doing science is not the same as making shoes
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-01-21 15:53:18]
    To the previous anonymous commenter: in a country whose officials censor translations of Obama's inauguration speech, the spirit of truth seeking does not exist. So even though China has been trying to buy good scientists for at least a decade (with mixed results, I should add), not much good science has come out of China. You don't need to worry: as long as China does not allow freedom of speech and thought, it will not beat the US or Europe in science.



    This is Just the Latest
    by anonymous poster

    [Comment posted 2009-01-21 12:41:16]
    This is China's latest move, which is brilliant! They have so much cash from the imbalance of trade that they are continuing what they have begun long ago. China has been working hard to beef up its scientific brainpower with cold, hard cash for many decades now. It began in the late 70's when that country would send their graduate students to any U.S. university that would take their full tuition payments. Hey, why lose all that money and even have to pay a stipend to the natives?!

    It worked like a song, and we can see the results at any basic medical science conference today.

    Should I say that this is an insidious form of war, where China is looking to "take over"? While it might be politically incorrect to use such terms, I am not hesitant to say yes. Everything is already made in China, from toys at McDonald's to those LG phones to big screen televisions. With this particular brain gain, along with thousands of U.S.-trained scientists coming on home, soon everything else that used to come from our scientific braintrust, drugs and medical devices, will be "Made in China".

    Within a decade, all we'll have left is guns and Hollywood.

    Am I the only one to see this?



    Comment on this blog