|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
New non-drug fix for HIV?
Posted by Alison McCook [Entry posted at 30th June 2009 02:53 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Return to Top comment: Well Duh! by John Bremner [Comment posted 2009-07-22 05:13:17] Researchers have known for at least the past 40 years that all viruses and bacteria attach to cells using (mainly) various sugar molecules before they invade them. Known attachment mechanisms involve mannose, glucosamine, ribose, and xylose, as well as collagen. So it's not surprising that cyclodextrin should help prevent viral attachment. Taking E.coli as an example, just interfering with the mannose attachment by putting mannose in the environment so that the bacterial and cellular mannose receptors are filled is sufficient. This is why, for example, drinking a d-mannose solution or giving a bladder instillation of mannose solves E.coli urine infections.
Knowledge of surface sugars on bacteria and viruses is gradually building, and cheaper isolation of these same sugars is making them available so that in the relatively near future, if you know what virus or bacteria is invading your system you will be able to have a targeted drink or injection that will defeat that particular bug by filling all its cellular receptors. Return to Top comment: Fix for HIV by Dominic Joelson [Comment posted 2009-07-03 11:12:01] Well its a good news then.
good thing they are still doing all their best. Return to Top comment: Cyclodextrins safety Cyclodextrins are large molecules (polysaccharides) and are basically not absorbed orally, thus limiting the treatment to intravenous administration with its own limitations. Although, 2-HP-b-cyclodextrins are considered relatively non toxic among different cyclodextrins, they are not "free" of side effects particularly after prolonged period of treatment. Eliminated from body exclusively through kidneys, kidney toxicity being the main concern in many species including human. Return to Top comment: Type of cyclodextrin by Alison McCook [Comment posted 2009-07-01 09:14:01] Hi-
In response to the question about types of cyclodextrins, the form James Hildreth uses in his research is 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin, sometimes abbreviated at BCD or beta-cyclodextrin. Alison McCook, Deputy Editor Return to Top comment: cyclodextrins by Brian Lee [Comment posted 2009-06-30 19:05:27] There are various cyclodextrins. I wonder which one(s) are relevant? Return to Top comment: Human testing by MICHAEL LINDE [Comment posted 2009-06-30 17:43:35] In response to Baxter, when you test a potential microbicide in humans, you don't intentionally expose them to the infectious agent. You run the trial like a vaccine trial--with a huge cohort so you will have enough exposures to assess efficacy. I can only assume why microbicide trials have been few and far between. Return to Top comment: Yes and No regarding primate test by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-06-30 15:49:16] Since we know that cyclodextrin is relatively safe in humans, I agree there is no reason not to try it and see if it helps some people with AIDS. But, that does not address testing to see if it can prevent HIV transmission. For that, you have to expose a healthy individual. I don't think you'd have a lot of volunteers lining up for that... hence the SIV/primate testing. But, if you can find prison inmates with life sentences that want to volunteer for conjugal visits w/ a horny HIV-positive "donor", I'm all for it.
Baxter Zappa Return to Top comment: Primates: stepping stone or roadblock? by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-06-30 14:51:37] This recalls some discussions from earlier news on primate research. The obligatory stop at the monkey house seems only to delay the progress of the research. Animal researchers and animal rights protesters should agree on this one: there's no point using monkeys if you've already been able to work out the basic biology in rodents. With a bit of highly voluntary bravery by sick people with little to lose, we can cut years and millions of dollars from the cost of finding new cures, while greatly reducing the number of primates kept in laboratory settings.
Return to Top comment: Innovative Research funded by NIH by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2009-06-30 12:26:10] NIH has been funding this work since 2002. I guess NIH Study Sections can identify innovative work. Comment on this blog |