http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/9.page JForum - http://www.jforum.net
[i](In I,II And III Sections)[/i]


[b]I.[/b]

[b]Life, Tomorrow's Comprehension[/b]

[b]Chapter I [/b]

Life, A Real Virtual Affair, Its Drive And Purpose

A. Life's Fractal Evolution

The observation of the CBF1 switch, from

http://www.physorg.com/news107357572.html

contributes to my view of the following major fractal chronological several-10^8-years macro layers of Life's evolution:

1. Definitions Of Earth Life, Organism, Gene, Genome And Cellular Organisms.

Earth Life: 1. a format of temporarily constrained energy, retained in temporary constrained genetic energy packages in forms of genes, genomes and organisms 2. a real virtual affair that pops in and out of existence in its matrix, which is the energy constrained in Earth's biosphere.

Earth organism: a temporary self-replicable constrained-energy genetic system that supports and maintains Earth's biosphere by maintenance of genes.

Gene: a primal Earth's organism.

Genome: a multigenes organism consisting of a cooperative commune of its member genes.

Cellular organisms: mono- or multi-celled earth organisms.
-------------------------------------------------

2. Update of life sciences conceptions is now feasible and urgently desirable

- Earth's biosphere phenomenon is a distant relative of black holes, a form of constrained
energy pocket.

- First were independent individual genes, Earth's primal organisms.

- Genes aggregated cooperatively into genomes, multigenes organisms, with genomes' organs.

- Simultaneously or consequently genomes evolved protective and functional membranes, organs.

- Then followed cellular organisms, with a variety of outer-cell membranes shapes and
functionalities.
-------------------------------------------------

3. Nature, Origin, Function And Purpose Of Life

Nature of Earth life: a replicating construction temporarily constraining and maintaining energy.

Origin of Earth life: serendipitous energy-induced formation of Earth's primal organisms, individual independent genes.

Nature of Earth's organisms: temporary self-replicable constrained-energy genetic systems that support and maintain Earth's biosphere by maintenance of genes.

Function of Earth life: uphold and maintain as much constrained energy as possible by upholding and maintaining Earth's biosphere.

The purpose of OUR life and its promotion is ours to choose and set. It derives solely from our cognition.

The biggest hindrance of scientific, and even technological, progress in comprehension and exploitation of Biology is the avoidance to accept-regard genes-genomes as organisms. And equally hindering is the lack of a term for genes-genome that explicitly and clearly defines them as organisms, as The Prime Cardinal Earth Life Organisms, distinguished from all cellular secondary stratum organisms.

This avoidance, which is fraught with implications about the nature of life, is also the biggest hindrance of human existential and social progress.

B. Viruses, Too, Are Bona Fide Organisms

Evolution is always in the direction of more effective survivability; however, this is not always in the direction of more complexing for coping with changing environments and competition. In a stable nutritious environment, like in Earth's oceans, coping with vital requirenments,
evolution, is in the opposite direction, simplify tooling and means.

It is plain common sense that viruses, even Viroids and Virusoids, nothing more than single strands of DNA or RNA, sometimes only 200-300 nucleotides long, are organisms as alive as we are, evolved at life genesis era and selected for survival in forms, composition and capabilities by living, and even replicating, off their richer kin. Smart little buggers.

C. Evolution-Survival Rediscovered

Quoting from "Aging And Genetics" at

http://www.physorg.com/news107180970.html

"genes associated with longevity also became more common in each succeeding cohort. These results indicate that the frequency of deleterious genotypes may increase among people who live to extremely old ages because their protective genes allow these disease-related genes to accumulate,”

It appears that Evolution and Selection For Survival have just been re-discovered.
When when when will "scientists" and "science literature editors" get it through their scientific skulls that the source of our (and others species') individuals' uniqueness is the genome's polymorphisms, which come about from polymorphisms of its member genes.

It is about time that "scientists" make the Life Evolution mental leap, that they swallow and digest the revelation that a genome is a living complex organism consisting of (by now) interdependent symbiotic living member genes.

D. Cells Are Not The Base Organisms

It irritates me again and again when unscientific science editors allow reference to cells as organisms. Cells are the spaceships, the edifices, that house the genomes, THE organisms. Scientifically cells are NOT organisms. The outer cell membrane is an organ. Plain and simple.
A possible explanation of this scientific ignorance is our still incomplete knowledge of the nature of the constituents of the cells' contents and of the functions of the outer-cell-membrane , the multifunctional organ of the genome, coupled with misty comprehension of the nature of life.

Cellular membranes and cells' contents are evolution products of the in-cell organisms, the genomes. Continued reference to cells as organisms is a gross anachronism that brakes/slows developement of life sciences.

E. Drive and Purpose of Life

Cognition = the capability, process or act of thinking, questioning and analysing.

Cognition is Cultural, is Biological. Cognition derives from culture, which is a biological attribute of ALL organisms regardless of size or complexity.

Culture = the totality of ways of the organisms' dealing with (reaction to, manipulation of, exploitation of) its environment.

The choice and promotion of our purpose in life derives solely from our cognition.

F. Encyclopedia of Life (EOL)

I read some time ago that biologist E.O. Wilson has a new project, The Encyclopedia of Life (EOL), aiming to make all knowledge of the world's 1.8 million known species freely available online within just 10 years.

I suggest that this would be a waste of effort and of time, because it would most probably be based on the presently accepted tree of life, with one thing branching off after another, we f.e. listed under genus Homo species sapien, genus being a grouping of one or more related and morphologically similar species.

I suggest that in the age of Genetics and DNA identification and definitions of genes expressions phylogeny should be redefined and reorganized based on the evolution of the genetic material, as the tree of life should present comprehension of how the genetic material has been evolving on Earth since four billion yrs ago...

The differences between the trees of life based on the classical "descriptive" taxonomy or on genetics would be great and of great consequences. A genetic-based tree would not only correct several wrong "placings" and throw light on and bring to view yet undiscovered junctions-relationships of genera, but I posit that - most important - the comprehension that ALL LIFE EVOLUTION is the evolution of genes/genes-associations since four billion yrs ago, I posit that this comprehension might have a radical influence on the cognition and culture of humans and on their implications in personal and societal life organizations.

G. More Re Life's Drive and Purpose

1. If one accepts, intuitively and logically, Pasteur's observation that all life must come from previously existing life, then the answer to "what makes a mono- and poly-cell life-form a Life" is the answer to "what makes some molecular associations in cells LIVES", and vice versa. It is the "lifehood" of genes that makes us and all other forms of life on Earth living organisms, and evolution has been the route of Life's ever more complexing progress since the first replication of the first gene.

Early independent peptides, primordial genes, have entered into symbiotic associations in which eventually each of the ever increasing host of functions/tasks vital for the evolving associations is taken up by the member most efficient at it, leading to gene speciation and to gene specialization.

The history of life begins with independent genes, cascading fractally from single independent genes to agregate of genes, then to agregate of agregate of genes. Cooperative association is an inherent feature of life throughout all its evolution and at all its levels, in pre-cell and in mono-cell life and in mono-cell communities and in poly-cell life-forms and in communities of poly-cell life forms.

2. The totality of life in Earth's biosphere (the outermost part of the planet's shell — including air, land, surface rocks and water — within which life occurs, and which biotic processes in turn alter or transform. Wikipedia.) is a temporary grand store of energy, and all living organisms are elaborate temporary energy storage containers and all base genetic materials are "Life quanta", carriers of "Life photons". Humans are just one of the many types of Earth's living organisms, regardless of the reason and purpose of their self-inflated high-self-esteem.

3. Life's evolution has been and still is and will continue to be the evolution of genes. The total number of defined genes, each with its own unique identity/functional-capability is, of course, the number of organisms' species multiplied by their number of different genes, which are now dependent-symbiotic members in chromosomes, cooperative-communes of genes. It is the GENES that evolve, and the evolution of the chromosomes and of 'higher strata' organisms is simply a consequence of their genes' evolution. The drive and purpose of evolution of the organisms is to enhance the functionality and survivability of the genes, in order to maintain and enhance Earth's biosphere energy storage, to maintain it BIO.

4. This is the plain bare story of the drive and purpose of life. We do not yet comprehend what ENERGY is generically. We are just beginning to comprehend the nature of the raw material called Life and that the purpose of OUR life is ours to choose and develop and follow.
Again, humans, like every other organism, are just products of evolution of the individual and collective genes of their genome. And humans, like every other organism, repay their genetic formers with feedbacks that serve to further modify their forming genes and to increase their formers' survivability. The 'higher-strata' organisms are only means of survival of THE PURPOSE of life, which is their base genes-genome. However, as far as the 'higher stratum' organism is concerned it itself IS the purpose of life; ask any human...

H. Earth Life Is A Real Virtual Affair

Earth Life Is A Real Virtual Affair; it pops in and out of existence in its matrix, which is the energy constrained in Earth's biosphere .

I. Tree of Life

1. In Biology Online, 26-28 Nov 2006, AG asks:
How is the Tree of Life rooted?... What could the last universal common ancestor be?
Dov suggests
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=194

2. Scientism and "evolutionary thinking" suggest that the study of the nature of life must be focused on the nature of the presently known earliest genes and on the probable nature of their probable earlier editions, backwards to the treshold of formation-transition of pre-RNA molecules into their self-replicating RNA editions, in the company of their precursors and of the predecessors of the precursors.

3. Most probable conjecture of the constellation of the Stealthy Life Genesis:

(a) In a (need composition definition) aqueous medium are present all components of the early "replicating configurations" plus all the predecessors of those components, and

(b) the energy balance of each of the progressing (steps) reactions, along the direction from the base elements level up to the replicator, are always forward-favoured, so that in the presence of all the required elements the replicator's formation energetically draws the progressive reactions.
The starting clues are, of course, the earliest available replicating compositions and their in-cell processes, and the starting unknown variables are the systems' base molecules and the systems' energetic circumstances.

(c) The essential early events of the energy-contents-driven "chemicals-to-life" progression comprise single-strand base extensions and ligations. DNA formation occurs most probably very much later.

All the consecutive steps in the progression are energy-contents-driven. Thus the chemicals-to-life transit is not a single dramatic step/rung of the ladder but consists of multi-small-steps/rungs and, due to variations in circumstances and in-line with the fractal nature of everything in the environments, it is random/stochastic.

(d) I conjecture life's genesis much earlier than the celling of genes. Genomes are communal coops of what way back originally were RNA independent genes, these various/different genes being then the first proliferrable life forms. Evolution and survival directed them and their much younger DNA progeny to become united, chromosomes and genomes, simply because cooperation is the most survivable mode, and the further process of evolution included celling for control of environmental parameters plus ever increasing member genes specialization as more capabilities evolve by some individual members of the commune of genes.

4. AG : I was also leaning toward Woese's theory.

Dov : Genesis Of Life

Carl Woese ( June 9, 1998 ):
"The ancestor ( of life ) cannot have been a particular organism, a single organismal lineage. It was communal (13, 22), a loosely knit, diverse conglomeration of primitive cells that evolved as a unit, and it eventually developed to a stage where it broke into several distinct communities, which in their turn become the three primary lines of descent".

Dov Henis:
Earth life's genesis cannot have been cell(s). Cells, liken all (every) objects and processes and natural laws in the universe, are - since singularity - products of evolution and are continuously further evolving. Everything in the cosmos is fractal, rehappens on many scales, and is continuously evolving. Each and every system in the universe continuously evolves within the total universal evolution and all the systems' evolutions are intertwined. Thus the root of earth's life cannot have been deus-ex-machina cells. Cells cannot have been but one of the forms of products of evolution of energy-transformation-storage systems, since at the beginning was the energy singularity, at the end will be near zero mass and an infinite dispersion of the beginning energy, and in-between, the universe undergoes continuous evolution consisting of myriad energy-to-energy and energy-to-mass-to-energy transformations. Therefore the roots of earth-life's genesis must have been much earlier than the celling of genes, in cosmic phenomena of active temporary reservoirs or pockets or bubbles of energy, on Earth in formation of individual RNA replicating genes.

[b]end chapter I[/b]
----------------------------------

[b]Chapter II[/b]

Natural Selection Is A Two Level Interdependent Affair

1) Evolution ensues from genome/genes modifications ("mutations"), inherently ever more of them as new functional options arise for the organism.

2) Modifications of genome's functional capabilities can be explained by the second-stratum organism's culture-life-experience feedbacks to its genome, its prime/base organism. The route-modification selection of a replicating gene, when it is at its alternative-splicing-steps junctions, is biased by the feedback gained by the genome, the parent organism, from the culture-life-experience of its progeny big organism. THIS IS HOW EVOLUTION COMES ABOUT.

3) The challenge now is to figure out the detailed seperate steps involved in introducing and impressing the big organism's experiences (culture) feedbacks on its founding parents' genome's genes, followed by the detailed seperate steps involved in biasing-directing the genes to prefer-select the biased-favored splicing.

4) I find it astonishing that only very few persons, non-professional as well as professional biologists-evolutionists, have the clear conception that selection for survival occurs on two interdependent levels - (a) during the life of the second-stratum progeny organism in its environment, and (b) during the life of its genome, which is also an organism. Most, if not all, persons think - incorrectly - that evolution is about randomly occurring genes-genome modifications ("mutations") followed with selection by survival of the progeny organism in its environment. Whereas actually evolution is the interdependent , interactive and interenhencing selection at both the two above levels.

[b]end chapter II[/b]
---------------------------------
[b]Chapter III[/b]

The Cosmic Drive and Purpose
Behind
The Drive and Purpose Of Life

(1) Again, Earth Life Is A Real Virtual Affair; it pops in and out of existence from its matrix, which is the energy constrained in Earth's biosphere. The totality of life in Earth's biosphere (the outermost part of the planet's shell, including air, land, surface rocks and water, within which life occurs, and which biotic processes in turn alter or transform. Wikipedia.) is a temporary grand store of constrained energy, and all living organisms are elaborate temporary energy storage containers and all base genetic materials are "Life quanta", carriers of "Life photons".

(2) Singularity and D-Infinity (max expansion/ cosmic energy dilution) are the two cosmic stable states. Their in-between is a metastable state, which is an everyday commonsense observation, like the observation that the denser the compacting goal of material the more energy is required, and vice versa the more thorough the disintegration of material the higher the amount of energy released. It seems that E=mC^2 is a specific case of the cosmic (and universal) process
E=Total[m(1+D)]
where D is the Distance from Big Bang point and the sum is of all spatial values of D from D=0 to D=selected value.

[BTW, (Nov 9 2006), following Newton (1) gravity is decreased when mass is decreased and (2) acceleration of a body is given by dividing the force acting upon it by its mass. By plain common sense the combination of those two 'laws' may explain the accelerating cosmic expansion of galaxy clusters, based on the above E/ m/ D suggested relationship.]

(3) Since the Universe, including its sub-systems, also Life, is a continuously evolving fractal system, ergo energy is the base element of everything and individual genes are the base elements of Life. Cosmic evolution is evolution of energy, and within it Life's evolution is the evolution of the genes/energy-quanta carriers.

At the beginning was the energy singularity. At the end will be near zero mass and an infinite dispersion of the beginning energy. In-between, the universe undergoes continuous evolution, consisting of myriad energy-to-energy and energy-to-mass-to-energy transformations. The cosmos evolution process comprises, though, phenomena of forms of temporary energy storage pockets, energy dispersion constraints. Examples of such temporary pockets are black holes of all sizes, and all forms of biospheres if/wherever they are.

The temporary constrained energy pockets are far-removed versions, up-fractionally evolved, scattered cosmic fragmants of singularity-akin energy sources. Energy stored in the temporary constrained energy pockets resists dispersion; we do not yet comprehend why and how. However, we comprehend that we, all Earth life, are real virtual products formed by Earth's biosphere energy for maintaining Earth's biosphere bio as long as possible.

[b]end chapter III[/b]
-------------------------------------
[b]Chapter IV[/b]

Science-Informed "Theism" (SIT), And Religion
There is no more competition between science and faith than between science and arts or science and tourism.

Science is systematized knowledge, whereas faith, arts and tourism and a host of other matters are components of culture, where culture is a ubiquitous biological entity of ALL organisms regardless of size or complexity, selected for survival as the sum total of reactions to and exploitations by the genome of the out-of-cell environments, sensed by the OCM, outer-cell-membrane of the genome, where this OCM is simply and plainly a multi-purpose organ of the in-cell resident communal organism, the genome.

(1) Science's "theism"

- Science's "theism" is An (therefore not The) unknowable undefined source of the energy that constitutes the unknowable undefined Universe.

- The unknowability of the source of cosmic energy, which is also life's matrix, leaves the choice and promotion of our purpose in life to be derived solely from our cognition.

- A term needs to be drawn for a concept and practice of deriving humanity's purpose and course of life. The term should not be related to theism or religion because SIT is NOT founded on faith-belief, and SIT's ethics code is founded on rational commitment and dedication to Life's inherent characteristic, which is cooperation for survival.

(2) Religion, Scientifically
A. Religion, A Human Evolution Definition
From a posting of mine in an evolution discussion forum, written and meant with complete respectful sincerity, at

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=19160&st=0&#entry286766

"A religion is a human artifact for survival of a specific human cultural phenotype, comprising cultural tool-kit and technique ascribed by its adherents to be of higher esteem and benefit than other human cultural survival plans".

B. Sincerely thinking so

Wondering if religious persons who also "accept" science would accept this definition, even with steady unwavering respect and commitment to their religion. IMO such acceptance would contribute respect to religion and to religious persons.

C. Major Conceptual Hierarchies:

- Religion is a progeny of culture, culture being a biological entity, like
- Technology is a progeny of science, like
- Biology is a progeny of life's evolution, like
- Universal Evolution is a progeny of Energy.

D. Uniqueness Of Science Among Human Artifacts
During the recent several centuries in the course of human history Science has been evolving at an accelerating rate as a provider of convincing, ever closer approaching, approximate models of the real world.

We understand that Science is just one of the components of our Culture, our package of capabilities to observe the environment, react to it and exploit it for our satisfaction and survival.

Yet there is a distinct, even if still small, growing spreading tendency to accept the findings of evolving Science with ever increasing respect and appreciation, especially in the realms of all forms and types of technology and of life disciplines.

The crucial 21st century question facing humanity is how much further and into which additional disciplines may or should Science be welcome and adopted by society at large, with what hopes and with what expectations.

[b]end chapter IV[/b]

and respectfully resting my case,
Dov Henis

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1
==========================
[b]PS:[/b]

I also suggest that general comprehension of evolutionary biology is an essential pre-requisite to the study of cultural anthropology.

- Culture is a basic biological entity. It is a ubiquitous elaboration/extension of genome's activity beyond its outermost cell membrane and of multicelled organisms' behaviour. It has been selected for survival of the genome as means of extending its exploitation capabilities of the out-of-cell circumstances, consequent to the earlier evolution and selection of the genome's organ, its outermost cell membrane, for controlling the inside-of-cell genes'-commune environmental circumstances.

- Every cultural element is an artifact which involves biological intra-/inter-cell expression and/or process; biological and cultural domains are not ontologically distinct, but instead culture inheres in biology.

- In the case of human cultures, ethnocentrisms are phenotypic cases of anthropocentrism; biologically both are normal Darwinian biological survival phenomena. Thus ethnocultures are human phenotypic survival tools.

*****************************************************
[b]II.[/b]

1. The Nature And Chronology Of Life

Earth Life: 1. a format of temporarily constrained energy, retained in temporary constrained genetic energy packages in forms of genes, genomes and organisms 2. a real virtual affair that pops in and out of existence in its matrix, which is the energy constrained in Earth's biosphere.


2. The nature of genes and of genomes

Earth organism: a temporary self-replicable constrained-energy genetic system that supports and maintains Earth's biosphere by maintenance of genes.

Gene: a primal Earth's organism.

Genome: a multigenes organism consisting of a cooperative commune of its member genes.

Cellular organisms: mono- or multi-celled earth organisms.


3. Approximate chronology of life's evolution

- First were independent individual genes, Earth's primal organism.

- Genes aggregated cooperatively into genomes, multigenes organisms with genomes' organs.

- Simultaneously or consequently genomes evolved protective and functional membranes, organs.

- Then followed cellular organisms, with a variety of outer-cell membranes shapes and
functionalities.

*****************************************************
[b]III.[/b]

Darwinism Corrected To Tomorrow's Comprehension.

Darwinians, It Is Culture That Drives Evolution!

March 16 2008
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=165&#entry323376

"By plain common sense it is therefore culture, the ubiqitous biological entity, that drives earth life evolution."

March 1 2008
"Culture Is Biology, It Imprints Genetics"
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=165&#entry316631

I. Quotes from "Chimp and human communication trace to same brain region"

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/cp-cah022108.php

" An area of the brain involved in the planning and production of spoken and signed language in humans plays a similar role in chimpanzee communication.
This might be interpreted in one of two ways:

One interpretation of our results is that chimpanzees have, in essence, a ‘language-ready brain'. By this, we are suggesting that apes are born with and use the brain areas identified here when producing signals that are part of their communicative repertoire.

Alternatively, one might argue that, because our apes were captive-born and producing communicative signals not seen often in the wild, the specific learning and use of these signals ‘induced’ the pattern of brain activation we saw. This would suggest that there is tremendous plasticity in the chimpanzee brain, as there is in the human brain, and that the development of certain kinds of communicative signals might directly influence the structure and function of the brain."

II. Quotes from earlier postings in this thread:

Culture Is Biology, It Affects Genetics

The Common Mistake: Genetic Changes Have NOT Made Us Human; Human Culture Has Been Changing Our Genetics.

A. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-12/uou-ahe120607.php
Are humans evolving faster?
Findings suggest we are becoming more different, not alike.

B. http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-12/uow-gsp120507.php
Genome study places modern humans in the evolutionary fast lane.

C. http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=207

From my postings way back in 2005, which cites genetic evidence/demonstration of the workings of human cultural evolution:

- From Science, 2 Sept 2005: "Page's team compared human and chimp Ys to see whether either lineage has lost functional genes since they split.
The researchers found that the chimp had indeed suffered the slings and arrows of evolutionary fortune. Of the 16 functional genes in this part of the human Y, chimps had lost the function of five due to mutations. In contrast, humans had all 11 functional genes also seen on the chimp Y. "The human Y chromosome hasn't lost a gene in 6 million years," says Page. "It seems like the demise of the hypothesis of the demise of the Y," says geneticist Andrew Clark of Cornell University in Ithaca, New York.
Chimp's genome has been continuing survival by physiologically adapting to changing environments.

- But look at this: From Science, Vol 309, 16 Sept 2005, Evolving Sequence and Expression:"An analysis of the evolution of both gene sequences and expression patterns in humans and chimpanzees...shows that...surprisingly, genes expressed in the brain have changed more on the human lineage than on the chimpanzee lineage, not only in terms of gene expression but also in terms of amino acid sequences".
Surprisingly...???

Human's genome continued survival mainly by modifying-controling its environment.

- And I suggest that detailed study of other creatures that, like humans, underwent radical change of living circumstances, for example ocean-dwelling mammals, might bring to light unique effects of culture-evolution processes and features of evolutionary implications parallel to those of humans.

D. Chapter II, Life, Tomorrow's Comprehension:

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=372

Natural Selection Is A Two Level Interdependent Affair

1) Evolution ensues from genome/genes modifications ("mutations"), inherently ever more of them as new functional options arise for the organism.

2) Modifications of genome's functional capabilities can be explained by the second-stratum organism's culture-life-experience feedbacks to its genome, its prime/base organism. The route-modification selection of a replicating gene, when it is at its alternative-splicing-steps junctions, is biased by the feedback gained by the genome, the parent organism, from the culture-life-experience of its progeny big organism. THIS IS HOW EVOLUTION COMES ABOUT.

3) The challenge now is to figure out the detailed seperate steps involved in introducing and impressing the big organism's experiences (culture) feedbacks on its founding parents' genome's genes, followed by the detailed seperate steps involved in biasing-directing the genes to prefer-select the biased-favored splicing.

4) I find it astonishing that only very few persons, non-professional as well as professional biologists-evolutionists, have the clear conception that selection for survival occurs on two interdependent levels - (a) during the life of the second-stratum progeny organism in its environment, and (b) during the life of its genome, which is also an organism. Most, if not all, persons think - incorrectly - that evolution is about randomly occurring genes-genome modifications ("mutations") followed with selection by survival of the progeny organism in its environment. Whereas actually evolution is the interdependent , interactive and interenhencing selection at both the two above levels.

E. Eventually

Eventually it will be comprehended that things don't just "happen", "mutate", randomly in the base-prime organism, genome, constitution; the capability of the base-prime organisms to "happen" and "mutate" is indeed innate, but things "happen" and "mutate" not randomly but in biased directions, affected by the culture-experience feedback of the second level multi-cell organisms or of the mono-cell communities.

Dov Henis

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/306.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/306.page GMT
[b]A.[/b] From

http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2007/10/artificial_life_again_1.html

"What a load of hogwash.

1. An organism such as bacteria or other cells are capable of self replicating themselves independently whereas genes cannot.

2. If genes-genomes were the fundamental organism from which cells have evolved they should be found independently, and abundantly so, in nature - whereas in fact they do not exist independently from cells.

3. Even assuming the illogical suggestion that genes-genomes are organisms how would not accepting this proposition hinder "scientific, and even technological, progress in .. exploitation of Biology"? - how would it be "the biggest hindrance of human existential and social progress"?

Conversely what great technological progress would be made possible by the acceptance of this proposition?"

[b]
B.[/b] Update your conceptions and comprehensions to the 21st century:

- Cells are NOT ORGANISMS. The cells' membranes are multi-functional ORGANS of the in-cell residents, the genomes.

- The cells' shapes and functionalities are products of the evolutions of the cells' genomes, whose directives and activities derive from their locations and required functions.

- And it is the culture, the package of the surviving-required behavior, that drives evolution.

- And it is the survival of genes that is the purpose of life, via the survival of genomes who are multi-genes organisms, via the survival of the mono- and/or multi-celled organisms.

- And the reason and purpose of the survival of genes is the enhancement and maintenance of Earth's biosphere.

- And the cosmic drive of enhancing-maintaining Earth's biosphere is to enhance-maintain a pocket of constrained energy.

- And the drive and purpose of constrained energy pockets in the cosmos, like black holes or like life, is one of the yet non-comprehended phenomena of the cosmic energy evolution process during the cosmic expansion from its most dense state towards its most expanded state, before onset of recontracting again.

- And this is as far as our 21st century macro concepts-comprehensions have presently arrived...

- "United we stand, divided we fall" is Life's moto. Genes and genomes, in mono-celled and in multi-celled organism have learned this many years ago. One day Humans will learn this, too.

- "what great technological progress would be made possible by...Science...?"
The extent of progress by science is as the extent of survival of Life.

Dov Henis
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1 ]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/345.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/345.page GMT
[i]Recapitulation of some earlier notes on[/i]
[b]Scientific Comprehension Of The Drive, Nature And Purpose Of Life[/b]

http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=195&#entry330517


[b]A.[/b] Uniqueness Of science among human artifacts

ALL aspects of our culture are, of course, anthropoartifacts, including science. Yet among those artifacts science has a distinct uniqueness for us.

During the recent several centuries in the course of human history humans have been developing science at an accelerating rate as a provider of convincing, ever closer approaching, approximate models of the real world.


[b]B.[/b] The drive and nature of life

Life Genesis, formation of the first genes, was a phenomenon of serendipitous occurrence, in a supportive environment, of 'favourably-coursed' energy potential between in-coming sun's radiation and polymerizing-precipitating RNA-related oligomeric configuration.

The drive of life and of its evolution is to enhance the functionality and survivability of the genes, in order to maintain and enhance Earth-biosphere's temporary constrained energy storage and to maintain the biosphere BIO as long as possible.

It is the genes, life's prime strata organisms, that evolve, and the evolution of genomes, the 2nd stratum of life, and of the 3rd life stratum cellular organisms, is an interenhancing consequence of their genes' evolution.


[b]C.[/b] The nature of life

Earth Life: 1. a format of temporarily constrained energy, retained in temporary constrained genetic energy packages in forms of genes, genomes and organisms 2. a real virtual affair that pops in and out of existence in its matrix, which is the energy constrained in Earth's biosphere.

Earth organism: a temporary self-replicable constrained-energy genetic system that supports and maintains Earth's biosphere by maintenance of genes.

Gene: a primal Earth's organism. (1st stratum organism)

Genome: a multigenes organism consisting of a cooperative commune of its member genes. (2nd stratum organism)

Cellular organisms: mono- or multi-celled earth organisms. (3rd stratum organism)


[b]D.[/b] Update of underlying life sciences conception is thus feasible

- First were independent individual genes, Earth's primal organisms.

- Genes aggregated cooperatively into genomes, multigenes organisms, with genomes' organs.

- Simultaneously or consequently genomes evolved protective and functional membranes, organs.

- Then followed cellular organisms, with a variety of outer-cell membrane shapes and
functionalities.

This conception is a scientific, NOT TECHNOLOGICAL, life-science innovation.

It is tomorrow's comprehension of life and of its evolution.

IT IS FRAUGHT WITH INTRIGUING DARWINIAN EVOLUTION IMPLICATIONS.

IT IS FRAUGHT WITH INTRIGUING TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS POTENTIALS.


[b]E.[/b] The purpose of OUR, human, life

The purpose of OUR life and its promotion is ours to formulate and set. It derives solely from our cognition.


Suggesting,

Dov Henis

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1



]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/578.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/578.page GMT
I believe based on many others who have spoken or written on this subject that the purpose of life is to help others. Our focus should not be on ourself but on our family, community, nation, and world. "Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country."

Mahalo
]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/580.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/580.page GMT I believe....that the purpose of life is ...
Mahalo
[/quote]

[quote]E. The purpose of OUR, human, life

The purpose of OUR life and its promotion is ours to formulate and set. It derives solely from our cognition. [/quote]

Respectfully,

Dov Henis]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/581.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/581.page GMT
Salam,
GatotS

]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/706.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/706.page GMT [/quote]

Sorry,

This is Evolutionary Biology, The Scientist...

I simply do not understand the question...

Respectfully,

Dov ]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/707.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/707.page GMT God created alls things in Proportion and Measure.
God created universe with the Most Beneficent.
God created universe, does not play dice.

Salam.
GatotS]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/714.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/714.page GMT

[b]A. Einstein to Max Born (4 Dec 1926) about Quantum mechanics:[/b]

"...it is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'old one'. I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice."

The Copenhagen interpretation is an interpretation of quantum mechanics. A key feature of quantum mechanics is that the state of every particle is described by a wavefunction, which is a mathematical representation used to calculate the probability for it to be found in a location, or state of motion. In effect, the act of measurement causes the calculated set of probabilities to "collapse" to the value defined by the measurement. This feature of the mathematical representations is known as wavefunction collapse.

Probably it is to this that the above, and also the following, Einstein saying refer: "Whether you can observe a thing or not depends on the theory which you use. It is the theory which decides what can be observed."


[b]B. Natural Laws, Whence And How They Come About[/b]

http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=14988&st=165&#entry319126

and

[b]Design And Randomness In Cosmic And Life Evolution [/b]

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1&p=404


Cosmic evolution is evolution of energy. At the beginning of the present cosmic cycle was the energy singularity. At its end there will be a 'small amount' of energy in the form of mass and an infinite dispersion of the beginning energy. In-between, the universe undergoes continuous evolution, consisting of myriad intertwined energy-to-energy and energy-to-mass-to-energy transformations.

The laws of nature, like rules of grammar for language, are products of cosmic evolution, the evolution of energy. They represent the most often observed repeats of processes. They are not vague directors of the courses of processes, but a summary of their observed repeats.


[b]C. It is not only the theory, but also its assessing circumstances, that decide what can be observed[/b]

From "Dark Energy And Matter And The Emperor's New Clothes"
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#638

The relationship between the physics of "Galaxy Clusters" and the physics of "Within Clusters" is like the relationship between classical physics and quantum physics. By present human assessment capabilities:

- Galaxy Clusters are the universe's past and present E - m conversion entities.

- The relationship between the physics of "Galaxy Clusters" and the physics of "Within Clusters" is, for us, considering our their assessment capabilities, like the relationship between classical physics and quantum physics.

- Our assessment capabilities of natural laws, of discerning the extent of repeats of natural process, are very much limited, instrumentally and by time-aspects, both at the large-scale/slow-process zone and at the minute-scale/fast-process zone of the evolving cosmos. Our biology, which includes our culture, limits our assessment capabilities to the mid-scale zone of the cosmos.


[b]D. For Us, Humans, Everything Boils Down To The Purpose Of Our Life,[/b]

including evolutionary cosmology, ordained or random.

The purpose of our life and its promotion is ours to formulate and set. It derives solely from our cognition.

Each of our ethno-cultural phenotype groups can consider itself, for its reasons and ends, the center and purpose of the cosmos, and live and act accordingly.

Or some ethno-cultural phenotype groups may conclude that the optimal life quality may be realized only via an All-Earth science-based rational approach to individual and group life, and organize and act accordingly. The purpose of our life and its promotion is ours to formulate and set. It derives solely from our cognition.


Dov Henis

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/721.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/721.page GMT From Philosophy :
Aristotle wrote : " Man by nature is a political animal. For as man is the best of all animals when he has reached his full development, so he is the worst of all when divorced from law and justice " ( Martyn Oliver, Hamlyn History ; Philosophy,1997 ).

From Religion :
Einstein : " God does not play dice ". More than 1000 years before Einstein : " We created not the heavens, the earth, and all between them, mere play " ( The Holy Quran 44 ; 38 ). " We created them not except for just ends, but most of them do not understand " ( The Holy Quran 44 ; 39 ).


I'm sorry,
GatotS]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/724.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/724.page GMT
[b]A. From "Photons caught in the act"[/b]

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/36794/title/Photons_caught_in_the_act
Physicists manipulated a microwave pulse and could essentially watch it transition from a quantum state into the realm of classical physics.

1. "Quantum objects — generally, anything that’s small enough to be ruled by quantum physics — can exist in multiple forms at the same time. An atom, for example, can be in two places at the same time, as can the crests and troughs of electromagnetic waves, such as in a microwave pulse."

2. "An atom, for example, can be in two places at the same time, as can the crests and troughs of electromagnetic waves, such as in a microwave pulse."


[b]B. From "Evolutionary Cosmology: Ordained Or Random"[/b]

http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=22994&st=0&#entry375698
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#721

Our assessment capabilities of natural laws, of discerning the extent of repeats of natural process, are very much limited, instrumentally and by time-aspects, both at the large-scale/slow-process zone and at the minute-scale/fast-process zone of the evolving cosmos. Our biology, which includes our culture, limits our assessment capabilities to the mid-scale zone of the cosmos.


[b]C. Thus the commonsensical explanation [/b]

1. It is NOT that "anyTHING SMALL enough" is "ruled by quantum physics". It is that any PROCESS that occurs FAST enough is ruled by quantum physics.

2. It is NOT that "an atom can be in two places at the same time". It is that our biology, our finest sensitivity to RATES of processes, does not enable us to perceive and resolve very-high-rate processes.


Dov Henis
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-P81pQcU1dLBbHgtjQjxG_Q--?cq=1]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/817.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/817.page GMT the driver of Universal Evolution, of all evolutions.[/b]

You are invited to look at "Rethink Unified Field Theory And Evolution"

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/60/122.page#982


DH
]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/994.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/994.page GMT We Can.


Salam,

Gatot S Astari


]]> http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/1001.page http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/preList/112/1001.page GMT