TheScientist.com - Magazine of the Life Sciences, Every Day, Online
  Please Login or Register
  • Home
  • Community
  • Current Issue
  • Browse Archive
  • Careers
  • Video & Multimedia
  • Subscribe

Front Cover
Advertisement
NRW: North Rhine-Westphalia
Supplements
  • Life Sciences in
    Ireland
  • Life Sciences in
    the Greater
    Phila. Region
  • Schizophrenia
  • Autoimmunity


Survey Series
  • Best Places to Work
  • $alary $urvey
  • The Scientist Video Awards
  • Lab Web Site and
    Video Awards

The Scientist Daily
  • Science headlines delivered daily.
    Register today.

Institutions
  • For Librarians
  • Recommend Us to Your Librarian

For Advertisers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Ad Team
  • 2009 Media Kit



by Jonathan B Weitzman

RESEARCH ROUND-UP

Uniparental disomy in ES cells
Selection with the drug G418 can be used to drive chromosome-specific loss of heterozygosity in targeted embryonic stem cells.

Email: Jonathan B Weitzman - jonathanweitzman@hotmail.com
News from The Scientist 2001, 2(1):20010307-02

Published 7 March 2001

Homozygous mutant cells can be generated from embryonic stem (ES) cells with a single insertion of a drug-resistance marker by increasing the concentration of the selection drug. In the March Nature Genetics, Lefebvre et al. report analysis of the mechanism governing this loss of heterozygosity (LOH) (Nature Genetics 2001, 27:257-258). They used an ES cell line resulting from a cross between two different inbred mouse 129 substrains which could be distinguished by single sequence-length polymorphisms (SSLP). Lefebvre et al. studied six different nemomycin-resistance (neo) gene insertions following selection with high doses of the drug G418. They found that in all cases homozygous cells exhibited extensive LOH, even at markers 16-66 cM from the neo insertion site. The mechanism of LOH therefore appears to involve chromosome loss and duplication, generating regions of uniparental disomy (UDP). Such UDP may affect the expression of imprinted genes on the duplicated chromosome. These observations may complicate functional analysis, but can also be exploited to screen for recessive phenotypes.


Not yet registered? Get free access
 

The article you are attempting to read is Premium content which is only available to our online subscribers.

 
 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Subscribing to The Scientist is easy and inexpensive.

 

And you can choose from many options. Try us out with an online day pass starting at only $4.95. Or, get it all with unlimited online access to The Scientist Archive and door-to-door delivery of our monthly print magazine.

 
  Not yet registered? Get free access  
 

The Scientist also offers site licenses to institutions and organizations. When your librarian adds The Scientist to the library's collection, you can get unlimited online access through your place of work or study.
Recommend The Scientist today

 





About TS | Contact | Advertise | Editorial Advisory Board | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2009 The Scientist