closure of several of its research libraries is" /> EPA cutbacks hurt science: Congress - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences
News:
EPA cutbacks hurt science: Congress
Posted by Bob Grant
[Entry posted at 14th March 2008 08:42 PM GMT]

The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) closure of several of its research libraries is flawed, unjustified and is depriving academics, government employees, and the public of crucial environmental data, according to a Congressional report released yesterday (Mar. 13).

Of the EPA's 26 libraries, six libraries have changed their hours of operation, and four others have been shut since 2006. These include its Office of Environmental Information headquarters library and the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Chemical library, both in Washington, DC.

The report, issued by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), calls EPA's attempt at cost-saving through reorganizing its library system disorganized and poorly implemented. "EPA's library plan describes the reorganization effort as a 'phased approach,'" the report reads, "but it does not provide specific goals, timelines, or feedback mechanisms that allow the agency to measure performance and monitor user needs to ensure a successful reorganization while maintaining quality services."

"To ensure that the network was evolving and keeping pace with newer demands from a growing, diverse customer base, EPA began reexamining its library model in 2003 to identify new ways to deliver library services and meet customer needs in a cost-effective manner," said EPA's chief information officer, Molly O'Neill, in testimony given at a House Science and Technology Committee hearing held yesterday.

EPA's libraries are used by local, state and federal agencies to enforce environmental rules, by advocates, members of the public, and researchers to mine environmental data.

Representative Bart Gordon (D-TN), chairman of the House Science and Technology Committee, was one of four Congresspersons who requested that the GAO conduct the inquiry. "GAO's report paints a grim picture of the current state of EPA's library system. The Agency's modernization effort is characterized by poor planning, failure to communicate with its employees, the public or Congress and failure to protect unique government assets," Gordon said in a statement. "There is only one way to describe the path to this outcome -- gross mismanagement."

"Our vision is to be the premier model for the next generation of federal libraries by enhancing our electronic tools to complement our traditional library services," O'Neill testified at the hearing.

Though the EPA planned to digitize much of the information in their libraries, the GAO report found that, due to copyright issues, the agency planned to make only ten percent of its library holdings available online.

In January of last year EPA issued a moratorium on further changes to its libraries. The GAO report recommends that the agency uphold the moratorium until the agency can better justify its reorganization plan and improve the reorganization process.

For FREE access to this news story and more, you must register.

Not yet registered? Get free access
 

The article you are attempting to read is only available to registered users of The Scientist. Registration is FREE and only takes a few seconds.

 
 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Create your MyScientist account and access all of The Scientist's free content, tools and life science email newsletters, including:

 

> The current month’s print issue

> Daily & Bi-weekly e-mail newsletters

> Newsblogs with breaking headlines

> The Scientist Community

> Exclusive web extras

> The Scientist Careers

 

Premium content from The Scientist Archive, a comprehensive resource of over 22 years of past life science coverage, is available only by subscription. Subscribe today and get unlimited access

 

 
LATEST NEWS