The Scientist

» scientific productivity

Most Recent

image: Start Making Sense

Start Making Sense

By | June 1, 2016

Scientific progress is only achieved when humans' innate sense of understanding is validated by objective reality.

6 Comments

image: NIH Grant Reviews Don’t Predict Success

NIH Grant Reviews Don’t Predict Success

By | February 18, 2016

Peer reviewers’ assessments of funding proposals to the National Institutes of Health don’t correlate well with later publication citations, a study shows.

1 Comment

image: Data “Overflow” Compromising Science?

Data “Overflow” Compromising Science?

By | September 25, 2015

According to a new study, the deluge of scientific literature is leaving researchers unsure of which information to trust.

0 Comments

image: Report: Impact of Biomedical Research Slipping

Report: Impact of Biomedical Research Slipping

By | August 18, 2015

Despite dramatic increases in publications, the last 50 years have seen relatively little return on investment for US public health, a study suggests.

15 Comments

image: Assessing Research Productivity

Assessing Research Productivity

By , , and | January 1, 2015

A new way of evaluating academics’ research output using easily obtained data

3 Comments

image: Opinion: Science in a Small European Country

Opinion: Science in a Small European Country

By | January 28, 2014

Internationalization is needed to strengthen science in Slovakia.

0 Comments

image: Lab 2.0

Lab 2.0

By | December 1, 2012

Apps and software for improving lab productivity

3 Comments

image: Predicting Publishing Futures

Predicting Publishing Futures

By | September 12, 2012

Researchers measure scientific output to determine if past success predicts future productivity.

6 Comments

Popular Now

  1. Secret Eugenics Conference Uncovered at University College London
  2. How Do Infant Immune Systems Learn to Tolerate Gut Bacteria?
  3. That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute
    Daily News That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute

    The Broad Institute and Rockefeller University disagree over which scientists should be named as inventors on certain patents involving the gene-editing technology.

  4. DOE-Sponsored Oak Ridge National Laboratory to Cut 100 More Jobs
AAAS