The Scientist

» journal

Most Recent

image: Pondering Science Publishing

Pondering Science Publishing

By | December 16, 2013

Panelists and attendees at the American Society for Cell Biology annual meeting considered the future of peer review and journal impact factors.

1 Comment

image: Opinion: Problems with Hidden COI

Opinion: Problems with Hidden COI

By | October 28, 2013

There may be much more to conflicts of interest than what gets declared.

0 Comments

image: Many Papers Lack Detailed Methods

Many Papers Lack Detailed Methods

By | September 6, 2013

Nearly half of scientific publications lack sufficient information about the research resources needed to reproduce experimental findings, a study finds.

0 Comments

image: Scientists Take Aim at Impact Factor

Scientists Take Aim at Impact Factor

By | May 20, 2013

A declaration asks the scientific community to put less weight on the metric, widely used to evaluate journals’ prestige.

2 Comments

image: Scientists Celebrate UK Libel Reform

Scientists Celebrate UK Libel Reform

By | April 29, 2013

New libel laws for England and Wales should help protect scientific debate, but campaigners worry that legal costs remain a threat.

1 Comment

image: Nature Announces Reproducibility Initiative

Nature Announces Reproducibility Initiative

By | April 25, 2013

The journal is sharpening its review of life science papers and giving authors additional space to document more detailed methods.

0 Comments

image: Is PubMed Hurting Scientific Journals?

Is PubMed Hurting Scientific Journals?

By | April 5, 2013

A study concludes that the open access repository is decreasing biomedical journal readership.

5 Comments

image: Disputed Research Ends in Tragedy

Disputed Research Ends in Tragedy

By | March 14, 2013

A biomedical researcher whose Nature paper was called into question was found dead in his lab.  

4 Comments

image: Cheap Impact?

Cheap Impact?

By | January 23, 2013

A new online tool allows researchers to compare open-access journal publication fees with article influence, and reveals that you don’t necessarily get what you pay for.

0 Comments

image: Opinion: Publish Negative Results

Opinion: Publish Negative Results

By , , and | January 15, 2013

Non-confirmatory or “negative” results are not worthless.

7 Comments

Popular Now

  1. Thousands of Mutations Accumulate in the Human Brain Over a Lifetime
  2. Two Dozen House Republicans Do an About-Face on Tuition Tax
  3. Putative Gay Genes Identified, Questioned
    The Nutshell Putative Gay Genes Identified, Questioned

    A genomic interrogation of homosexuality turns up speculative links between genetic elements and sexual orientation, but researchers say the study is too small to be significant. 

  4. Can Young Stem Cells Make Older People Stronger?
FreeShip