Boris Igić : A fertile mind

By Megan Scudellari Boris Igić : A fertile mind © 2010 Matthew Gilson Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago. Age: 33 In 1997, Boris Igić, a junior at Washington University in St. Louis, was pursuing a degree in history. But after the third meeting of his first-ever course on evolution, he rushed out the classroom door and made a beeline to the registrar’s office, where he switched his major t

By | November 1, 2010

Boris Igić : A fertile mind

© 2010 Matthew Gilson

Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago. Age: 33

In 1997, Boris Igić, a junior at Washington University in St. Louis, was pursuing a degree in history. But after the third meeting of his first-ever course on evolution, he rushed out the classroom door and made a beeline to the registrar’s office, where he switched his major to biology. A few months later, Igić handed in the first science term paper he’d ever written, an analysis of the genetic basis of plant self-incompatibility (SI)—a plant’s ability to recognize and reject its own pollen—in three distantly related plant families. He got a B+. Four years after that, at the end of his first year of graduate school, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published a refined version of that paper.1 This past August, Igić, now a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, received an E-mail from Science. A paper he recently wrote had been accepted. The topic? Plant self-incompatibility.

Related Articles

2

Following up on that work in his own lab, Igić and collaborators measured speciation and extinction rates of flowering-plant species with and without SI. They found that species are constantly losing SI and acquiring the ability to self-fertilize, because this allows individuals to beget offspring more quickly under a variety of conditions. But they are also far more likely to go extinct, presumably because of their lack of genetic diversity. “Loss of self-incompatibility is an unintentionally overplayed evolutionary gambit, one which rarely pays off,” says Igić.

DISCUSSION: Igić continues to work on SI and finding new ways to approach it experimentally.3 “He has a great depth of knowledge about what’s been done in the field,” says Goldberg. “And he’s good at seeing gaps where things don’t add up.”

Literature Cited
1. B. Igić, J.R. Kohn, “Evolutionary relationships among self-incompatibility RNases,” PNAS, 98:13167-71, 2001. (Cited 107 times, http://bit.ly/RNAseEvo)
2. B. Igić et al., “Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system transitions,” PNAS, 103:1359-63, 2006. (Cited 35 times)
3. E. Goldberg et al., “Species selection maintains self-incompatibility,” Science, in press.

Comments

Avatar of: PAUL STEIN

PAUL STEIN

Posts: 61

November 9, 2010

Science Vol. 330 (22 October 2010). pp. 493-495.
Avatar of: Mike Waldrep

Mike Waldrep

Posts: 155

November 9, 2010

Interesting!

Popular Now

  1. Thousands of Mutations Accumulate in the Human Brain Over a Lifetime
  2. Two Dozen House Republicans Do an About-Face on Tuition Tax
  3. 2017 Top 10 Innovations
    Features 2017 Top 10 Innovations

    From single-cell analysis to whole-genome sequencing, this year’s best new products shine on many levels.

  4. The Biggest DNA Origami Structures Yet
    Daily News The Biggest DNA Origami Structures Yet

    Three new strategies for using DNA to generate large, self-assembling shapes create everything from a nanoscale teddy bear to a nanoscale Mona Lisa.

FreeShip