Eye evolution questioned

Invertebrates with vertebrate-like vision challenge the idea that the two groups of organisms have distinctly different visual receptors

By | March 1, 2011

The standing dogma of eye evolution is challenged with the discovery of an invertebrate that sees light like vertebrates do, rather than like their more closely related cousins, according to a study published today (March 1) in EvoDevo.
T. transversa larva
Image: Nina Furchheim, Berlin Museum of Natural History
"Now the story is more complicated than it was before, when we thought there was a clear-cut division between vertebrates and invertebrates," said lead author linkurl:Yale Passamaneck;http://www.kewalo.hawaii.edu/martindale/mmpeople.html from Kewalo Marine Laboratory at the University of Hawaii. Animal eyes vary in appearance, but the light-sensing photoreceptor cells within them come in just two varieties: ciliary and rhabdomeric. Vertebrates see light with the ciliary type, which sports a folded, hair-like cilium, while invertebrates see with rhabdomeric photoreceptors, which typically bear bristles. In 2004, biologists hypothesized that an ancestor of both invertebrates and vertebrates sensed light with rhabdomeric receptors -- but also had ciliary receptors embedded deep within their brains, where they have been found in marine worms and bees, and might have sensed patterns, such as the lunar cycle. As vertebrates evolved, ciliary receptors theoretically migrated towards the body surface and became the primary tools for sight. But the new results challenge this scenario with the discovery of surface ciliary photoreceptors in the larvae of marine invertebrates called brachiopods (Terebratalia transversa), shelled creatures that have been around for 540 million years. Passamaneck and his colleagues identified the expression of a gene characteristic of ciliary receptors, ciliary-opsin, in cells in the light-sensing "eyespot" of larval brachiopods. "This is completely novel," said linkurl:Detlev Arendt,;http://www.embl.de/research/units/dev_biology/arendt/members/?s_personId=673 an evolutionary biologist at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory in Germany who was not involved with the study. "No one has looked for opsins in many animals, and this is exactly what we should be doing."
T. transversa adult
Image: Yale Passamaneck
Now it's unclear which photoreceptor originally gave animals sight, and which kind evolved to sense light later. Or, perhaps an ancestor used both receptors to see, and over the millennia, one variety or the other lost its visual function. Additionally, the researchers found that sand-grain-sized brachiopod embryos, which don't have a head, nerves, or eyespots, also expressed the ciliary-opsin gene, suggesting it may have a role even before the development of true eyes with photoreceptors that are connected to the brain. Found in nearly half of the embryos' cells, this is the first report of ciliary-opsin expression in non-neuronal cells. "We're really excited about this discovery because it was really a naïve experiment to do since these embryos don't even have eyes," Passamaneck says. While the function of ciliary-opsin at this life stage remains unclear, the embryos did gravitate towards light, hinting at the possibility of a role in rudimentary vision. Playfully dubbed "swimming eyeballs" by the team, the embryos may represent a time before true eyes evolved, when visual proteins were somehow involved with sensing light in individual cells, Passamaneck said. If so, brachiopods may provide key insights into how vision first evolved. Y. Passamaneck, et al., "Ciliary photoreceptors in the cerebral eyes of a protostome larva," linkurl:EvoDevo,;http://www.evodevojournal.com/content/2/1/6/abstract 2:6, 2011.
**__Related stories:__***linkurl:Seeing ear to eye;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/57540/
[1st July 2010]*linkurl:Ancient eyes head for the light;https://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55204/
[19th November 2008]*linkurl:An eye on history;https://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/54992/
[29th August 2008]


Avatar of: anonymous poster

anonymous poster

Posts: 2

March 1, 2011

From Wikipedia: "Traditionally brachiopods have been regarded as members of or as a sister group to the deuterostomes, a super-phylum which includes chordates and echinoderms. One type of analysis of brachiopods' evolutionary relationships has always placed brachiopods as protostomes, while another type has split between placing brachiopods among the protostomes or the deuterostomes."\nThis means that the evolution of eyes from ciliated cells in brachiopod larvae is not entirely unexpected.
Avatar of: anonymous poster

anonymous poster

Posts: 1

March 3, 2011

From Wikipedia: "From 1988 onwards analyses based on molecular phylogeny, which compares biochemical features such as similarities in DNA, have placed brachiopods among the Lophotrochozoa, a protostome super-phylum that includes molluscs, annelids and flatworms but excludes the other protostome super-phylum Ecdysozoa, whose members include arthropods."\n\nI suggest to read always the whole Wikipedia Article.
Avatar of: Richard Patrock

Richard Patrock

Posts: 52

March 9, 2011

The book, The invertebrates: a synthesis\n By Richard Stephen Kent Barnes, pg. 434 (Google Books) suggests a more nuanced perspective on the findings outlined in this article. First, cnidarians and deuterostomes are known for ciliary receptors, suggesting a long history in the invertebrates. Second, at least one clam (Pecten) is known to have both ciliary and rhambdomeric receptors in their eyes (not deep in their (less than extraordinary) brains and third, there is a platyhelminth with a ciliary cell in one ocellus, again a surface receptor, not a 'third eye'. It will be interesting to see whether the ciliary-opsin gene is more widespread

Popular Now

  1. How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body
    Daily News How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body

    Millions of measurements from 23 people who consumed extra calories every day for a month reveal changes in proteins, metabolites, and gut microbiota that accompany shifts in body mass.

  2. That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute
    Daily News That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute

    The Broad Institute and Rockefeller University disagree over which scientists should be named as inventors on certain patents involving the gene-editing technology.

  3. Neurons Use Virus-Like Proteins to Transmit Information
  4. EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent
    The Nutshell EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent

    Shortly after ruling out the earliest priority dates on a foundational patent for CRISPR gene-editing technology, the European Patent Office rescinded the patent entirely—and more are likely to follow.