Libel Case Against Nature Starts

A theoretical physicist is suing the journal for an article it ran about his publication practices.

By | November 14, 2011

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, AVJOSKA

Opening arguments in the libel trial against the venerated scientific journal Nature got under way last week in London's High Court. Egyptian physicist Mohamed El Naschie is suing the publication for running a 2008 news story that he claims damaged his reputation. The article alleged that El Naschie self-published numerous papers in the Elsevier-owned theoretical physics journal Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, where he served as editor-in-chief for 17 years. The Nature story, which is "temporarily unavailable" on the journal's website, also claimed that El Naschie listed several honorary professorships and other affiliations that journalist Quirin Schiermeier could not confirm.

According to BBC News, the lawyer representing Nature in the case said in his opening statement that he would argue the validity of the article, which represented what he called "true, honest opinion and responsible journalism on an issue of public interest." El Naschie is representing himself in the case. The blog site El Naschie Watch, which is highly critical of the physicist, has predicted that the High Court is likely to rule in favor of Nature within a month.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: jhnycmltly

jhnycmltly

Posts: 65

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 14, 2011

I suppose one can therefore EXPECT to be censured by Nature for "inappropriate" medical theories ? If Nature is NOW being sued for libel then my experience of being censured may not be as uncommon as I might like to think.

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Avatar of: kinjal shah

kinjal shah

Posts: 2

November 15, 2011

Thanks for informative post. I am pleased sure this post has helped me save many hours of browsing other similar posts just to find what I was looking for.
Industrial Surplus

Popular Now

  1. Thousands of Mutations Accumulate in the Human Brain Over a Lifetime
  2. Two Dozen House Republicans Do an About-Face on Tuition Tax
  3. 2017 Top 10 Innovations
    Features 2017 Top 10 Innovations

    From single-cell analysis to whole-genome sequencing, this year’s best new products shine on many levels.

  4. The Biggest DNA Origami Structures Yet
    Daily News The Biggest DNA Origami Structures Yet

    Three new strategies for using DNA to generate large, self-assembling shapes create everything from a nanoscale teddy bear to a nanoscale Mona Lisa.

FreeShip