Speaking of Science

January 2012's selection of notable quotes

By | January 1, 2012

istockphoto.com, Günay Mutlu

ISTOCKPHOTO.COM, GUNAY MUTLU

Population and consumption are no more separable in producing environmental damage than the length and width of a rectangle can be separated in producing its area—both are equally important.

—Biologist Paul Ehrlich, speaking with Stanford University News about the revelation that Earth’s seven-billionth citizen was born in late October (Oct. 26, 2011)

Google has enough capacity to do all of genomics in a day.

—Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory computational biologist Michael Schatz, as quoted in the New York Times article, “A Genome Deluge” (Dec. 1, 2011)

The public, and especially the political class, cherry-picks its science. If a scientist finds a promising treatment for AIDS or cancer, then he is a hero; if he warns about overpopulation, climate change, or toxic contamination of the environment, then he risks either being ignored or, worse, being subjected to ridicule. Such negative incentives reduce to a handful the number of scientists who are willing to speak out.

John Terborgh in a review of Tim Flannery’s book Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet (NY Review of Books, Oct. 13, 2011)

If you think research is expensive, try disease.

Mary Lasker, philanthropist and advocate for medical research

We need to stop pretending it’s all about molecular biology. Serious illnesses are affected by aesthetics, by art, and by the moral questions that are negotiated between practitioners and patients.

Ted Kaptchuk, Harvard Medical School placebo researcher, as quoted by Michael Specter in “The Power of Nothing” (The New Yorker, Dec. 12, 2011)

In science, new ideas are rightly met with skepticism, if not denials and dismissals. But as the consequences of predator loss become increasingly measurable and predictable, they implicitly call for a reassessment of our ancient foes.

—Conservation writer Caroline Fraser, in Yale University’s online publication, Environment 360 (Sep. 15, 2011)

 

 

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Aleksandraa Coriic

Aleksandraa Coriic

Posts: 1457

March 14, 2012

The fourth one is the best one. the government should fund our research ... after all, every useful fact that we know of was a product of extensive research. Cheers from Ontario 

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

March 14, 2012

The fourth one is the best one. the government should fund our research ... after all, every useful fact that we know of was a product of extensive research. Cheers from Ontario 

Avatar of:

Posts: 0

March 14, 2012

The fourth one is the best one. the government should fund our research ... after all, every useful fact that we know of was a product of extensive research. Cheers from Ontario 

Popular Now

  1. That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute
    Daily News That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute

    The Broad Institute and Rockefeller University disagree over which scientists should be named as inventors on certain patents involving the gene-editing technology.

  2. How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body
    Daily News How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body

    Millions of measurements from 23 people who consumed extra calories every day for a month reveal changes in proteins, metabolites, and gut microbiota that accompany shifts in body mass.

  3. DOE-Sponsored Oak Ridge National Laboratory to Cut 100 More Jobs
  4. Neurons Use Virus-Like Proteins to Transmit Information
AAAS