Controlling Bee Fate

Reversible marks on the genome allow honeybees to swap between lives as nurses and foragers.

By | September 16, 2012

Sajjad Fazel" > Wikipedia, Sajjad Fazel

Honeybee workers can flip back and forth between two careers, thanks to a small number of reversible epigenetic changes. Researchers from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Arizona State University showed that the switch from young nurse bees, which stay in the hive to care for grubs, to older travelling foragers involves a set of epigenetic marks that affect how a small number of genes are used. And if the foragers change back into nurses, the marks revert, too.

The results, published today (September 16) in Nature Neuroscience, are the first to show that two patterns of behavior are associated with reversible epigenetic changes.

“Behavioral biologists talk readily about adaptive plastic behaviors that allow an organism to respond to its immediate environment,” said Seirian Sumner, a behavioral ecologist at the Institute of Zoology, London, who was not involved in the study. “This paper is the first step in exposing the mechanisms, and making them possible to study.”

“This is one of those papers that makes me envious,” said David Sweatt, a neurobiologist from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who was not involved in the study. “I feel it will be a foundational paper in the nascent field of behavioral epigenetics.”

Brian Herb, a student in Andrew Feinberg’s lab at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, started by comparing one type of epigenetic change—DNA methylation—in the brains of five queens and five workers. Even though another research group had published 550 genes with methylation differences between these two castes, Herb found none.

“We thought that we were asking the wrong question since a queen never turns into a worker,” said Feinberg. “That’s not flexible.” Within the worker caste, however, are nurse bees and foragers. “Bees start off as nurses and then become foragers,” said Gro Amdam of Arizona State University, who co-authored the study. “It’s as different as being a scientist or journalist. It’s really amazing that they can sculpt themselves into these two roles that require very specialist skills.”

When Herb compared the methylation patterns of nurses and foragers, he found differences in 155 genes. These were largely involved in controlling the activity of other genes, packaging DNA into chromatin or cutting up RNA transcripts. “They look like genes that are regulating plasticity,” said Feinberg.

Next, Florian Wolschin, a postdoc in Amdam’s lab, removed all the nurses from the team’s hives while the foragers were away. “The foragers come back and go, ‘Oh no, what happened?’ Half of them turn back into nurses,” said Feinberg. “Their bodies change a little bit and their behavior’s completely different.” Such reversals are rare in the wild, but they can happen when hives split up and old queens leave with young workers to found new colonies. The new queens inherit existing nests that are devoid of young nurses, and some old foragers revert roles to fill the employment gap.

The team found that methylation patterns in 107 genes changed during the forager-to-nurse reversion, 57 of which overlapped with the nurse-to-forager set. Although Sumner points out that the sample size is “scraping the statistical barrel,” the team did repeat their experiment with a fresh set of bees and found the methylation in 45 of the same 57 genes changed with both role switches.

About half of the methylation changes seem to silence the genes they mark, and others change the way the RNA transcripts of other genes are spliced. “A nice mechanistic flow chart is emerging,” said Sumner. Environmental triggers lead to changes in methylation that influence how genes are expressed or processed, leading to changes in behavior. “This pretty much describes a behavioral genomicist’s dream!” she added.

Sumner points out that the shift from nursing to foraging can happen over a matter of hours— a seemingly easy change despite the stark differences in behavior. She now wants to know if animals that show stronger shifts in behavior throughout their lives would have more dramatic epigenetic changes too. “At what point does behavioral reversibility become an irreversible unidirectional shift?” she wondered.

B. R. Herb et al., “Reversible switching between epigenetic states in honeybee behavioral subcastes,” Nature Neuroscience, doi:10.1038/nn.3218, 2012.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: jvkohl


Posts: 53

September 17, 2012

The adaptive plastic behavior that allows organisms such as bees to
respond to their immediate environment with epigenetically-determined
changes in their behavior was predicted by what is known about the
adaptive evolution of sexual reproduction in microbes. Sex differences
in behavior (e.g., in yeasts) appear to result from gene duplications
driven by the need for genomic adaptation to a changing nutrient
chemical environment, as evidenced in paralogues of genes that enhance
the ability to use glucose.

Cellular metabolism of nutrient chemicals to
pheromones allows conspecifics to recognize and to learn
and to remember what evolved to become what we call sex pheromones that
control reproduction in all species -- as pheromones also do in asexual
microbes prior to the evolutionary advent of sexual reproduction. The
difference in behaviors that adaptive evolution has established via
ecological, social, neurogenic, and socio-cognitive niche construction
in the honeybee model organism are simply an extension of the epigenetic
effects of nutrient chemicals and pheromones that were
transgenerationally inherited via the behavior of species from microbes
to man.

Oddly, what we presumed in 1996 to be an established biological
fact when we published our Hormones and Behavior review, titled: From
fertilization to adult sexual behavior, may not have been fully
considered and may not be now, in the light of new evidence that
can be integrated across disciplines and across species in the context
of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of bee behavior. But the
epigenetic effect on behavior in the honeybee can not truly be
considered the first evidence that DNA methylation alters behavior,
can it?

Sexual orientation in any species is epigenetically and transgenerationally linked to
their survival despite wide variations in nutrient-dependent,
stress-dependent, endocrine disruptor-dependent and pheromone-dependent
sexual behaviors. We wrote: Parenthetically it is interesting to note even the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a gene-based equivalent of sexual orientation
(i.e., a-factor and alpha-factor physiologies). These differences arise from
different epigenetic modifications of an otherwise identical MAT locus (Runge
and Zakian, 1996; Wu and Haber, 1995).

Since the epigenetic effects of these modifications on sexual orientation and associated behaviors in a unicellular organism were known 16 years ago, does anyone else wonder why they now appear to show up only in the behavior of the honeybee model organism?

Avatar of: diana kornbrot

diana kornbrot

Posts: 2

September 19, 2012

wow. think what that might mean for humans when all the sons get killed at war! or even when there are no sons, cf Liz 1.

meanwhile, as a researcher into technology for the blind, would like to warn the scientist that this, apparently simple, page is inaccessible to screen readers [10 wave errors, 35 mark up errors, 93 css errors]. blind scientists may be a samll group - but they deserve better, am willing to help

Popular Now

  1. Thousands of Mutations Accumulate in the Human Brain Over a Lifetime
  2. Two Dozen House Republicans Do an About-Face on Tuition Tax
  3. 2017 Top 10 Innovations
    Features 2017 Top 10 Innovations

    From single-cell analysis to whole-genome sequencing, this year’s best new products shine on many levels.

  4. The Biggest DNA Origami Structures Yet
    Daily News The Biggest DNA Origami Structures Yet

    Three new strategies for using DNA to generate large, self-assembling shapes create everything from a nanoscale teddy bear to a nanoscale Mona Lisa.