Biologists Not Welcome

Proposed legislation that sought to offer green cards to foreign STEM students excluded those in biology.

By | September 28, 2012

Legislators purposely excluded biological sciences from a failed bill that would have provide 55,000 green cards a year to foreign graduates with advanced US degrees in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields, due to concern that competition for jobs in the life science sector is already too fierce.

“There is a very high unemployment rate in [the biological sciences] sector already,” an aide to Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), who sponsored the bill, titled the STEM Jobs Act told ScienceInsider. “It doesn't make sense to make it any harder” for US scientists to find a job in the biological sciences.”

Although the bill failed in the House last week (September 20), industry experts applauded the exclusion of biosciences from the proposal, also citing the current job market. “The people who wrote this bill seem to have done their homework,” Michael Teitelbaum, a demographer and senior adviser at the Albert P. Sloan Foundation in New York City told ScienceInsider. "They have avoided the sledgehammer approach of saying that everybody in a STEM field is the same, which is not true."

The bill aimed to make it easier for foreign students earning masters or doctoral degrees to. stay in the country, rather than return home and work for American competitors. Currently, nearly 4 out of 10 masters students in the STEM fields are foreign born, while only 5 percent of immigrants are selected based on education. “This bill makes our immigration system smarter by admitting those who have the education and skills America needs,” Smith told The Washington Post.

Despite bipartisan support for helping the country retain STEM graduates, the bill failed because it would have also cut other visa programs, leading democrats to accuse republicans of trying to slash total immigration rates. Democrats have also drafted a similar bill, and the next Congress is expected to reconsider the issue. The new bill, however, also excludes biological sciences.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Science Guy

Science Guy

Posts: 1

September 28, 2012

I agree with comments from Paul Stein on the failed House bill, but why must it be all or none? Too much business competition underwritten by foreign governments prompts complaints to the WTO from the U.S. government, but not in the academic sector. I like the international character of science, but where do U.S. scientists go for relief in a wildly undercut labor/funding market? Most other countries do well protecting their homegrown scientists, maybe too well (stifling adequate levels of competition and innovation). What exists now is globalization on steroids. No wonder Joe Six-pack has no investment in modern ideologies.

Avatar of: Macranthunter


Posts: 1

September 30, 2012

The US has the right to throttle over the boarder employment at will. If we have a field at capacity in the US why flood the market? It's unfair to both the US citizen and the immigrant. The only issue I see is that we must pass blanket bills to govern something that should shift daily with employment and demand figures.

Popular Now

  1. Secret Eugenics Conference Uncovered at University College London
  2. Like Humans, Walruses and Bats Cuddle Infants on Their Left Sides
  3. How Do Infant Immune Systems Learn to Tolerate Gut Bacteria?
  4. Scientists Continue to Use Outdated Methods