Coughing Seashells

A type of scallop expels water and waste through a sort of cough that could reveal clues about water quality.

By Edyta Zielinska | November 28, 2012

ScallopsFlickr, adactioScallops, a commercially valuable food source, are known to exhibit slowed growth in poor quality water that contains toxic algae or low levels of oxygen. One method of testing the water quality, then, is to harvest the mollusks and check the ridges on the shell, which indicated the amount of growth like the thickness of rings in a tree.  The process, however, is labor intensive and disrupts the scallop colony. 

Now, researchers from the Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer, in France, in collaboration with acoustic experts, have found that they may be able to discern the bivalve’s health and metabolism by recording how often it coughs. In a study published in the Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, researchers were able to record the sound of the scallops as they expel waste and water through its valves, which sounds like a pop followed by a drawn out breath or swooshing sound. The recordings allowed the researchers to distinguish the sound of scallop cough from other benthic animals as far as tens of meters away amid the other ambient oceanic noise. (You can listen to the mollusk coughs here.)

By analyzing cough patterns in high and poor water quality, researchers hope to develop a non-invasive system of detection that could give clues about water quality, as well as other mollusk behaviors such as swimming, jumping, or spinning.

(Hat tip to ScienceNOW)

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: kitapbigi


Posts: 20

February 11, 2013


To Dave20640, 65% is the proportion of the 2,000 retracted articles, not of all articles published. If 200,000 articles were published, that would be only 2/3 of one percent of all articles published; not a stunning number. I didn't see anything in the article (or the linked material) that indicated whether 2,000 was large or not, by comparison. What perplexes me is that these people think they are not going to get caught. That makes me wonder if there's a lot more going on than we know about, that they do know about. I then wonder why we don't see, in these reports, information that they were asked if, in their experience, this kind of behavior is widespread. Not that we would necessarily be confident about the veracity of their observations. kredi hesaplama-evim şahane - fragman izle - mobilya modelleri


Popular Now

  1. RNA Moves a Memory From One Snail to Another
  2. Could a Dose of Sunshine Make You Smarter?
  3. Sweden Cancels Agreement With Elsevier Over Open Access
  4. Researchers Develop a Drug Against the Common Cold