The chemist examined the role of activated oxygen molecules in biological processes.
Bottlenose dolphins can recognize and respond to their own “signature whistles,” strengthening the evidence that these whistles function like names.
July 23, 2013|
VINCENT M. JANIK, UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWSOne of the most fascinating aspects of language is the ability to name individuals, objects, and places with a signature sound. While human language skills may be unique, African Grey parrots and captive bottlenose dolphins have been taught to link specific sets of sounds with objects—a rare ability in the animal kingdom. But whether, and in what contexts, these animals apply the same principles in the wild has been hotly debated. Now, research published yesterday (July 22) in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences suggests that dolphins do use and respond to individual names.
In the first few months of life, each bottlenose dolphin develops what’s known as a “signature whistle”—a collection of notes unique to each dolphin. Though dolphins mostly stick to their own whistle, anecdotal evidence suggested that dolphins sometimes copy each others signature whistles. “But it wasn’t understood why [they might copy each other], or who produced the copies,” explained Stephanie King, a marine mammal scientist at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, who led the new research. Because the signature whistles are unique, it was conceivable that dolphins could be using them to label or address other dolphins, King noted.
In order to get a clearer sense of who calls whose whistle and under what circumstances, King and her collaborators first recorded calls of dolphins off the coast of Florida and a few dolphins in captivity. The researchers found that copying only occurred between animals with close social bonds, such as mothers and calves or pairs of captive male dolphins. The team published the work in Proceedings of the Royal Society B earlier this year.
This initial “study showed that dolphins are most likely to copy the signature whistles of close associates, shortly after the associate whistles,” Peter Tyack, a marine mammal biologist at the University of St. Andrews who was not involved in the research, wrote in email to The Scientist. The copying occurred when dolphins were separated from friends and family, and it seemed “they really want to reunite,” noted King.
But these dolphins had been artificially separated by the researchers, making it unclear whether whistle copying occurs between free-swimming dolphins, noted Laela Sayigh, an animal behavior researcher at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute who collaborated with King on the study.
If the signature whistles truly act as names, King and Vincent Janik, also at St Andrews, hypothesized that dolphins would respond to hearing their own whistles, as if addressed by another dolphin. To test this, the scientists recorded dolphins off the coast of Scotland, and stripped the whistle recordings of “voice cues” that signify who’s doing the whistling, retaining only the signature whistle itself.
The researchers then played various recordings—a dolphin’s own signature whistle, a known associate’s signature whistle, or the signature whistle of an unknown dolphin—and found that dolphins reacted almost exclusively to hearing their own whistles, whistling in response.
It shows that signature whistles “are equivalent to human names, which makes this study very exciting,” said King.
“It’s often been hypothesized that another animal may copy [a signature whistle] to initiate contact, and this study supports that idea,” added Sayigh.
However, Tyack noted, when copying another’s whistle, dolphins introduce a minor but consistent change, which wasn’t reproduced in King’s latest study, and how these alterations influence dolphin responses remains to be seen. Sayigh agreed that much remains unknown about the specifics of dolphin call and response, such as whether an individual recognizes the voice of the dolphin copying its whistle.
Why dolphins may use “names” when other animals don’t appear to is also unclear, but King hypothesized that in addition to their intelligence, dolphins’ complex social structure and underwater environment, where limited visibility makes sound an important identifier, encouraged the evolution of vocal labeling.
S. King and V. Janik, “Bottlenose dolphins can use learned vocal labels to address each other,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, doi:10.1073/pnas.1304459110, 2013.
S. King et al., “Vocal copying of individually distinctive signature whistles in bottlenose dolphins,” Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biology, 280:20130053, 2013.
July 24, 2013
Would individual recognition (unique call and response) using signature sounds ('names') between nonrelated members of loosely aggregated groups constitute the first step to establish sentience in a nonhuman species?
The key may be the slight changes that indicate that the responder 'copying' the unique signature whistle is replying, signaling that they recognize the whistle as familiar.
July 25, 2013
Really, it’s a rare ability they are bestowed with. Researches have already proven that animals communicate in their own manners. They even mourn and grieve over the loss of their loved ones.
Now this finding reminds me of Marc Bekoff who once said that we must be anthropomorphic when we discuss animal emotions and communication. Dolphins’ response to individual names is opening a new chapter of research.