On Women Studying STEM

Eileen Pollack combines personal experience and data in an essay about being a woman in science.

By | October 4, 2013

FLICKR, SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONWhen Eileen Pollack, a professor of creative writing at the University of Michigan, graduated from Yale University in 1978, she was one of the first two women to earn a bachelor’s degree in physics. In spite of excelling academically, her professors never encouraged her, and she never believed she was good enough at science to attend grad school in physics or math. In an essay published this week (October 3) by The New York Times magazine, Pollack weaves her personal story together with anecdotes and research about being a woman in science today.

“I wanted to understand why I had walked away from my dream, and why so many other women still walk away from theirs,” Pollack wrote. In interviews with female undergraduate and graduate trainees, Pollack uncovered story after story of roadblocks and scorn that young women who study science still encounter. For instance, one student reported that a physics teacher once told her that she would be graded on a curve specifically for girls, while the boys would have their own, presumably more rigorous, curve. Meg Urry, a Yale professor of physics and astronomy, told Pollack she was “flabbergasted” after hearing these stories from women in her own department.

Pollack’s personal experience and that of many of the women she spoke to focused on physics, where women earn only one fifth of the PhDs. But even in biology, where they earn more than half the PhDs, women still face discrimination. In her essay, Pollack discussed a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences last year that revealed the subtle bias of biology, chemistry, and physics faculty against women. In the study, the professors were sent identical application materials for either “John” or “Jennifer,” candidates for a lab manager position. Both male and female science faculty ranked John above Jennifer in competence, hireability, whether the candidate was deserving of mentorship, and what salary they would offer the candidate.

Jo Handelsman, professor of cellular and molecular biology at Yale and senior author of the PNAS study, told Pollack that she was not surprised by the study’s results. “Nor was she surprised that the bias against women was as strong in biology as in physics or chemistry, despite the presence of more female biologists in most departments. Biologists may see women in their labs, [Handelsman] says, but their biases have been formed by images and attitudes they have been absorbing since birth,” wrote Pollack.

In the face of inherent biases against women scientists, Pollack makes suggestions for improvement, such as welcoming women to science relatively late and getting educators on board. “Most of all, we need to make sure that women—and men—don’t grow up in a society in which they absorb images of scientists as geeky male misfits,” she writes. “As so many studies have demonstrated, success in math and the hard sciences, far from being a matter of gender, is almost entirely dependent on culture.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 237

October 7, 2013

One should really read the New York Times essay as well as all of the comments after it to understand the full extent of the issues from the perspective of the women.  I have been around science for a few decades now, and have seen the female "dropout" rate.  Oftentimes at conferences, I have asked my male counterparts where (insert name here) went, and get nothing more than puzzled shrugs.  Now I think I know based on these readings.  I may be walking into a buzzsaw commenting on this, but here goes.

One thing that greatly impressed me is the perception many of the women had to the reception they got from male colleagues and men who should have acted as mentors on almost anything scientific (conversations, projects, theses, ideas, etc.), and the internalization the women do.  Some of what they received was obviously crassly negative, but most was, at worst, ambivalence, which it seems, these women took to be a negative and truly struck home.

Herein lies a major difference between men and women.  Men will challenge anything from anyone that even appears to be negative to their personality, thoughts, or deeds.  Most women, based on what I have read here, will not, so what is left is only their "feelings" about the particular situation.  In many of these stories, I see a lot of giving up without any sort of personal confrontation even if that may have been nothing more than a simple question or conversation.

In the end, I have read tons of stories of resigned disappointment by women, to each of which, any man in the audience would have responded with, "That's crazy!  Why didn't she just (insert any typical male action here)." 

Hence, it may be that Mars folks need to understand what goes through the minds of Venus folks.  It may be that for the majority, women totally need to be formally encouraged every step of the way to enter and, especially, maintain their development in STEM careers.

Popular Now

  1. A Newly Identified Species Represents Its Own Eukaryotic Lineage
  2. Telomere Length and Childhood Stress Don’t Always Correlate
  3. Optogenetic Therapies Move Closer to Clinical Use
  4. Research Links Gut Health to Neurodegeneration
    The Nutshell Research Links Gut Health to Neurodegeneration

    Rodent studies presented at the Society for Neuroscience meeting this week tie pathologies in the gastrointestinal tract or microbiome composition with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases.