Where Science and Policy Meet

Two top 20 lists—from scientists to policy makers and vice versa—aim to bridge gaps in understanding between these groups.

By | December 2, 2013

FLICKR, BUDDAWIGGIThe divide between science and policy is so obvious that a group of scientists writing in Nature last month (November 20) generated a 20-item long list of advice to use when interpreting scientific claims. Chris Tyler, the director of the U.K.’s Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, has now responded with a list of the top 20 things scientists should know about policy-making, published today (December 2) in The Guardian.

“The immediate priority is to improve policy makers’ understanding of the imperfect nature of science,” William Sutherland and David Spiegelhalter of the University of Cambridge in the U.K. and Mark Burgman of the University of Melbourne in Australia, wrote in Nature. “Politicians are smart, strategic people, they just aren’t sufficiently cautious of scientific advice,” Burgman told The Guardian. “They are either a little intimidated by it, or they ignore it.” The authors’ list of tips for interpreting science included reminders that “correlation does not imply causation,” and that “extrapolating beyond the data is risky.”

“The authors . . . have produced a list that picks up on many of the challenges that scientists report when engaging with policy makers, and it does so in a constructive way,” Tyler wrote in his response at The Guardian. “But the fact remains that all too often, scientists blame politicians for failures when science meets policy-making, when in truth the science community needs to do much more to engage productively with the people who actually make policy.”

Tyler consulted with colleagues at the Office of Science and Technology and suggested 20 tips for scientists interacting with policy makers. Two of their suggestions reminded scientists that “making policy is really difficult,” and that “starting policies from scratch is very rarely an option.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Kathy Barker

Kathy Barker

Posts: 44

December 11, 2013

This article, with its links, is an excellent tool for policy makers and scientists in understanding each other's priorities and culture.

Avatar of: Kathy Barker

Kathy Barker

Posts: 44

December 11, 2013

See also "12 Things Policy-Makers and Scientists Should Know About the Public." 



Popular Now

  1. How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body
    Daily News How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body

    Millions of measurements from 23 people who consumed extra calories every day for a month reveal changes in proteins, metabolites, and gut microbiota that accompany shifts in body mass.

  2. That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute
    Daily News That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute

    The Broad Institute and Rockefeller University disagree over which scientists should be named as inventors on certain patents involving the gene-editing technology.

  3. Neurons Use Virus-Like Proteins to Transmit Information
  4. EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent
    The Nutshell EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent

    Shortly after ruling out the earliest priority dates on a foundational patent for CRISPR gene-editing technology, the European Patent Office rescinded the patent entirely—and more are likely to follow.