Volvox barberi actively organize themselves into large colonies that optimize space.
Scientists present the first evidence that marine cyanobacteria release vesicles—billions and billions of vesicles.
January 10, 2014|
COURTESY STEVEN BILLERMicroorganisms in the ocean release billions upon billions of tiny vesicles each day, but no one had noticed until very recently. Scientists published the first evidence of vesicle production by marine cyanobacteria in Science this week. “The finding that vesicles are so abundant in the oceans really expands the context in which we need to understand these structures,” MIT postdoc Steven Biller, the lead author on the paper, said in a press release.
So far, what Biller and his colleagues do know is that cultured Prochlorococcus—the most numerous photosynthetic organism on earth—continually produce vesicles, which contain proteins, DNA, and RNA; seawater samples are also abundant in vesicles. Vesicles collected from the wild contained DNA from a variety of organisms, suggesting that other microbes also shed them.
Further, the researchers found that nonphotosynthetic bacteria grown in the lab could be sustained with vesicles as their only source of carbon. “That’s kind of neat,” Marvin Whiteley, a microbiologist at the University of Texas, Austin, who was not involved in the study, told Wired. “It really changes how we think about marine ecosystems and how they’re set up and how nutrients are provided.”
Biller’s colleague Sallie Chisholm, a professor of biology at MIT, told LiveScience that it’s not clear why the microbes are making vesicles. “If you have an organism eking out a living in a really dilute environment, where nutrients are extremely low, why would it cast things off into the environment that would limit its own growth?” Chisholm asked. “We figure these vesicles have to have some important function.”
January 10, 2014
My conjecture or wild guess is that these vesicles might be for expelling waste products or toxic substances from the cell.
January 13, 2014
From what I read elsewhere, phages that use Prochlorococcus to reproduce cannot discriminate between the vesicles and the actual organism. So each one that latches on to a vesicle decoy is one that won't successfully infect an actual Prochlorococcus organism.
It's odd that this article omitted this comment one of the researchers made that these vesicles were also likely to be virus decoys considering that of all the assumptions it made the most scientific sense and they had actual proof it was happening.