Shift in Animal Research-Related Attacks

Animal rights extremists have more recently targeted individuals, rather than the universities they work for, according to a new report.  

By | March 13, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, JANET STEPHENSIn the 1990s, universities were the most common targets of attacks by those opposed to the use of animals in research. More recently, animal rights extremists have shifted their focus toward individuals, business partners, and investors, according to a new report from the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB). “These activities can happen to anybody—no one is immune,” Michael Conn, a cochair of the committee behind the report and the senior vice president for research at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center in Lubbock, told ScienceInsider.

FASEB’s report looked into 220 illegal incidents by animal extremists from 1990 to 2012. According to the report, “extremists have placed bombs in cars, sent ‘AIDS-tainted’ razor blades in the mail, and desecrated the graves of their targets’ relatives.” In the ’90s, 61 percent of the incidents were aimed at universities, while 9 percent targeted individuals' homes or property. After 2000, universities suffered 13 percent of the attacks, while individuals were the target of 46 percent of the attacks. Business partners and investors received 6 percent and 11 percent of the attacks, respectively, from 2000 to 2012, whereas they were not targeted in the 1990s.

The report goes on to offer advice to individuals and organizations to reduce the risk of being attacked, to communicate with the public, and to protect oneself from harassment or violence. Eric Bernthal, the chair of the board of directors of the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), told ScienceInsider that “we don’t condone terror and destruction of property.” But he added that the report didn’t spend enough time talking about why scientists are targets of animal rights extremists. “If you’re going to give advice to researchers about how to solve this problem, the most constructive way is to use fewer animals in research, not assemble crisis communication teams.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Randy Janssen

Randy Janssen

Posts: 1

March 14, 2014

The HSUS is not your local animal shelter. The HSUS has been hijacked by animal rights fanatics that oppose eatting meat and the farming methods used on family farms. The HSUS makes money by showing pictures of cute dogs and cats and asking people to help them, then its spends the money on obscean saleries and litigation. It says it spends 79% of the collected money on animal welfare programs, then it uses mysterious accounting  methods to hide its real use. The money is used for anti meat propoganda and some say, paying people to do acts of cruelity against animals in meat processing, so they can be published on youtube. The HSUS has been found guilty of rackaterring in Florida and is being investigated for fraud by several attorney generals. The HSUS is bad for the country.

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 237

March 14, 2014

The staging of "cruelty" is a common tactic by the extremists.  The only ones who don't know about these blatant falsifications are the people who donate to the front organizations like PeTA and the HSUS.  These, and other practices, are orders of magnitude more cruel than anything in the laboratory.

It's time for the Federal government to remove their tax-exempt status.

Avatar of: Astraea


Posts: 2

March 14, 2014

This is disgusting...  Dessicrating graves and planting car bombs?  Seriously.  And the organization's response is 'We don't condone terrorism' but instead of talking about how to protect yourself from these attacks you should just stop using animals in research?  I'm pretty sure suggesting people give in to terrorists is conding terrorism.

Popular Now

  1. That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute
    Daily News That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute

    The Broad Institute and Rockefeller University disagree over which scientists should be named as inventors on certain patents involving the gene-editing technology.

  2. How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body
    Daily News How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body

    Millions of measurements from 23 people who consumed extra calories every day for a month reveal changes in proteins, metabolites, and gut microbiota that accompany shifts in body mass.

  3. Neurons Use Virus-Like Proteins to Transmit Information
  4. DOE-Sponsored Oak Ridge National Laboratory to Cut 100 More Jobs