The Surprising Evolution of Sex Determination

A detailed analysis of sex chromosomes finds unexpected evolution of functional Y chromosome genes across species.

By Rina Shaikh-Lesko | April 23, 2014

WIKIMEDIA, ARCHAEOGENETICSA core set of genes on the Y chromosome has been retained through much of animal evolution, not just for male sexual development, but also as regulatory genes in a wide array of tissues, according to two studies published today (April 23) in Nature. Previous research has shown that the Y chromosome has undergone dramatic gene loss, retaining only 3 percent of its ancestral genes, compared to 98 percent for the X chromosome. Two independent teams—one led by David Page at MIT, the other by Henrik Kaessmann and Diego Cortez at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland—studied a wide variety of animals to demonstrate that the Y chromosome eventually developed a stable set of genes.

The papers provide “a tremendous rational for why these genes have been retained,” said geneticist Carlos Bustamante of Stanford Medical School, who was not involved in the work. “This massacre of genes, as it were, is really tempered by the genes that have been retained, [which] have been retained for a very specific reason. It’s not a random subset of genes.”

Page’s team studied the Y chromosome in eight animals: four primates (human, chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, and marmoset), three other mammals (rat, mouse, and bull) and a marsupial, a South American opossum. The researchers recently produced new, high-quality sequences for some of these Y chromosomes, but have been working on many of them for more than a decade.

The Y chromosome is often ignored when a certain species’ genome is sequenced, partly because it presents challenges that other chromosomes don’t. The detailed sequences Page’s team developed were necessary, however, to compare genes on the Y chromosome with those on the X chromosomes to find pairs of genes on both. They found 36 genes that were present on both the X and Y chromosomes in at least one of the eight mammals they studied. Many of these genes are involved in transcription, translation, and other regulatory functions. When they studied the evolution of the sex chromosomes through an analysis of genes on discrete chunks of the X chromosome that are associated with specific time periods in its evolution, the researchers found that two genes, UBE1Y and KDM5D, were retained in both mammals and marsupials. Such retention across such distinct lineages would be highly unlikely if Y chromosome gene degradation were random.

“We calculated odds, and if you were playing poker, it’s like getting a Royal Flush on your first try. It was completely unexpected,” said lead author Daniel Bellott. Because UBE1Y and KDM5D are involved in DNA condensation, he added, “they have a very compelling biological role, evolutionarily.”

The researchers also found that genes that have X and Y counterparts, or gene pairs, are more likely to be dosage-sensitive—dependent on expression by both chromosome pairs. Most of these genes are expressed in a variety of tissues, countering the popular view that genes on the Y chromosome are mainly involved in male sexual development. “The Y chromosome has been historically badly misunderstood—it’s been put in a very small box,” said Page. “What we especially aim to do . . . is to move beyond the view that the Y chromosome is relevant only in the context of reproductive biology.”

The second study, from Cortez and Kaessmann’s team, examined 15 animals, including a bird (chicken) and a monotreme (platypus) and divergent mammalian lineages (placentals and marsupials), which possess five different X and Y chromosome pairs. The researchers studied RNA sequences found in males but not females, as well as sex chromosome genomic data. They found that placentals and marsupials didn’t develop the SRY gene—the primary gene in the male sexual development cascade—until just before the two lineages split, much later than previously thought. Monotremes developed an independent sex chromosome system which probably depended on the AMH gene.

“The origin of SRY occurred 180 million years ago, just prior to the split with marsupials,” said Kaessmann. “This was after monotremes parted from us.” Despite differing origins, however, the two lineages developed similar systems of sexual development cascades, almost in parallel. In chickens, the sex chromosomes didn’t evolve until 140 million years ago.

Kaessman said his team’s findings raise interesting questions about how ancient mammalian ancestors differentiated the sexes. He pointed to the crocodilian method of using temperature to discern young males from females, and suggested that mammalian ancestors may have used some similar environmental mechanism.

Like Page’s group, the Swiss team also found that Y chromosome genes were expressed in a variety of tissues beyond those involved in sexual development and are dosage-dependent.

“What’s really clear is that a lot of these genes aren’t just involved in sperm production,” said Bustamante. “In fact, they’re involved in very basic cellular processes that cut across tissues and that their retention has really been driven by a need to maintain a narrow range of expression and dosage compensation.”

W. Bellot et al., “Mammalian Y chromosomes retain widely expressed dosage-sensitive regulators,” Nature, 508:494-9, 2014.

D. Cortez, et al., “Origins and functional evolution of Y chromosomes across mammals.” Nature, 508:488-93, 2014.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


April 24, 2014

in the end, science will find that nothing in the human body or indeed, the universe stands in a "very small box", that no part is so inert to not affect the whole, and that when our intellect is ripe enough, free of its own brand of inertness, the one string that links every part into a whole, that one string that pulls the machine and  foots the entire bill, from the nano to the mega, within the material world, biotic or abiotic will be revealed; and like the near magical crystalisation that springs into a supersaturated medium at the toss of one provocateur, we may find greater simplicity or greater complexity when that stage is reached. how i can't wait

Avatar of: Ferez


Posts: 12

April 24, 2014







 Y is more than sex switch. Peter Shimon's Post LinkedIn. 4.23.2014. pdf




Avatar of: Hugh-F-61


Posts: 77

Replied to a comment from Ferez made on April 24, 2014

April 24, 2014



There are plenty of species where males are XO, there is no Y chromosome  at all, so a Y need not be essential, but this can only occur if meiosis still works. In many Orthopterans the X univalent moves to one pole at meiosis I and divides at meiosis II giving half of sperm an X chromosome.






Avatar of: Hugh-F-61


Posts: 77

April 24, 2014

The temperature-difference mechanism for sex determination found in alligators and turtles depends on eggs being left in unattended nests, typically sun-warmed, with clutches large enough to have a marked temperature gradient across them. This presumably led to redundancy and  loss of genetic sex determination.  Animals that have small clutches (insects) or brood eggs to maintain their temperature, or retain embryos inside them at a uniform temperature must have a genetic sex determination mechanism.  Presumably the dinosaurs that brooded eggs had chromosomal sex determination, as did our fishy ancestors

Avatar of: Curculio


Posts: 61

April 24, 2014

What is the genetic basis for temperature dependent sex determination?

Avatar of: N K Mishra

N K Mishra

Posts: 60

April 25, 2014

During the course of evolution, the repetitive sequences close to the critical genes of Y must have withstood the natural pressure. Whether they are immune to dosage phenomena or have undergone modulation remains to be elucidated.

Avatar of: Ferez


Posts: 12

Replied to a comment from Hugh-F-61 made on April 24, 2014

November 29, 2015

The response is a bit late but I just saw your comment and hasten to add this qualifiying response!

The key to this assertion, is to know the lower limit of XY, XO tissue chimerism reported inthose putative XO mice(?). Beatrice Mintz (1968) reported enzyme and kayotype studies showing an adult male sex chromosome chimera with 95% XX and only 5% XY somatic cellular components. Singh et al (1985) reported in situ hybridization results with Bkm probes showing a chimera with 90% XX and 10% XY testicular cells.  This means the Y and Sry are dispensable in the adult stage but not in the stage d10.5-d12 when sex is being determined. Using these results as a basis we showed high frequency deletions of the Y and Sry even in retired breeder males. Burgoyne and Palmer (1992) used a transgene to beta globin and karyotypes to identify the minimal numbers of Sertoli cells as that were invariant 88% (which were the only ones of the four testicular cell types) present in male sex chromosome chimeras. This number is now rendered as uncertain by our results showing Sry instability!

All this leads to the question of how confident you can be that in the period when sex is being determined, the threshold number of XY cells required for sex/testis determination were truly absent in those putative XO organisms?

Popular Now

  1. How to Separate the Science From the (Jerk) Scientist
  2. Could a Dose of Sunshine Make You Smarter?
  3. Prevalent Form of Childhood Leukemia May Be Preventable
  4. Arizona Moves to Alter Wording About Evolution in Education