Ebola Update

Vaccine testing could start soon; Spanish nurse declared free of virus; travelers from West Africa restricted to five US airports

By | October 23, 2014

Ebola virionsWIKIMEDIA, PLOS BIOLOGYThe World Health Organization (WHO) announced at a news conference in Geneva this week (October 21) that two experimental Ebola vaccines, already undergoing Phase 1 clinical trials in the United States and other countries outside of the affected zone, could be entered into large-scale trials in West Africa in January. Meanwhile, three other vaccines are expected to begin safety testing in regions outside the epidemic by March.

In preparation, Johnson & Johnson, which is co-developing one of the experimental vaccines with the Danish company Bavarian Nordic, is committing $200 million to the program; the firms aim to produce as many as 250,000 doses by May and a million total next year. “Typically, you don’t make hundreds of thousands of vaccines before you know what the safety and immunogenicity is,” Paul Stoffels, chief scientific officer of Johnson & Johnson, told The New York Times. “This time, we will do that.” GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), which is developing an experimental Ebola vaccine in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health, is also working to pump out its product. “We are doing everything we can to produce as many doses as we can as quickly as we can,” said GSK’s Ripley Ballou told NYT.

In addition to these vaccine development efforts, Marie-Paule Kieny, assistant director general for health systems and innovation at the WHO, noted on Tuesday that serum from the blood of recovered Ebola patients, which contains antibodies that can attack the virus, could be available in Liberia within weeks, BBC News reported. María Teresa Romero Ramos, the Spanish nurse who was the first to contract Ebola outside of West Africa, was reportedly treated in this way, along with an undisclosed experimental drug, and on Tuesday she was declared virus-free, The Guardian reported.

In the U.S., the Obama administration continues to heighten precautionary measures to prevent the import and spread of Ebola in the country. Most notably, the five US airports that recently implemented a new screening strategy for identifying people at risk of carrying the virus will now be the only five airports accepting flights from West Africa. “We are continually evaluating whether additional restrictions or added screening and precautionary measures are necessary to protect the American people, and will act accordingly,” Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson told The Wall Street Journal.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: kristindewey

kristindewey

Posts: 7

October 23, 2014

They should have limited the flights to five airports in the U.S. the first week the Dallas patient was identified as having Ebola.

Avatar of: xxxjg

xxxjg

Posts: 4

October 27, 2014

If it is stupid idea…why not to find out?

 

Killing virus:

 

From outside

 

  1. To expose human body, infected by a virus, to very cold condition (cryo chambers for example) – time of exposure depends on condition of a patient
  2. Then expose a human body to hot condition (for example using dry sauna)
  3. Repeat process with brakes to recover

 

From inside

 

More effective way would be to lower down body temperature by drugs and keep it for a while in this condition (but avoid hypothermia) a few hours minimum.

 

Then increase body temperature to 39-40 degrees C and keep it in this condition for a few hours.

 

The whole process should be repeated if necessary.

 

Cold conditions-virus deactivation Hot condition – removing virus from a body

 

In the Africa (lack of cryo chambers) you could assemble mobile hospitals next to big meat warehouses (freezers) and carry on treatment once in the freezer then in the sun.

 

Once again treating from inside (lowering/increasing temp. by drugs) would be more effective.

Avatar of: xxxjg

xxxjg

Posts: 4

October 27, 2014

If it is stupid idea…why not to find out?

 

Killing virus:

 

From outside

 

  1. To expose human body, infected by a virus, to very cold condition (cryo chambers for example) – time of exposure depends on condition of a patient
  2. Then expose a human body to hot condition (for example using dry sauna)
  3. Repeat process with brakes to recover

 

From inside

 

More effective way would be to lower down body temperature by drugs and keep it for a while in this condition (but avoid hypothermia) a few hours minimum.

 

Then increase body temperature to 39-40 degrees C and keep it in this condition for a few hours.

 

The whole process should be repeated if necessary.

 

Cold conditions-virus deactivation Hot condition – removing virus from a body

 

In the Africa (lack of cryo chambers) you could assemble mobile hospitals next to big meat warehouses (freezers) and carry on treatment once in the freezer then in the sun.

 

Once again treating from inside (lowering/increasing temp. by drugs) would be more effective.

Popular Now

  1. Man Receives First In Vivo Gene-Editing Therapy
  2. Researchers Build a Cancer Immunotherapy Without Immune Cells
  3. Research Links Gut Health to Neurodegeneration
    The Nutshell Research Links Gut Health to Neurodegeneration

    Rodent studies presented at the Society for Neuroscience meeting this week tie pathologies in the gastrointestinal tract or microbiome composition with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases.

  4. Long-term Study Finds That the Pesticide Glyphosate Does Not Cause Cancer
RayBiotech