Scientists Urge Museums to Cut Koch Ties

Dozens of researchers called on science and natural history museums to sever financial relationships with fossil fuel companies and philanthropists who fund climate change denying scientists and organizations.

By Bob Grant | March 24, 2015

The Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.WIKIMEDIA, AGNOSTICPREACHERSKIDNatural history museums and similar institutions should stop taking donations and accepting sponsorships from “the fossil fuel industry and funders of climate science obfuscation,” according to a March 24 open letter signed by dozens of climate researchers and biologists. The letter, posted by the online and travelling exhibitor called The Natural History Museum, expresses the concern that institutions such as the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) and the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History are compromising their integrity through their associations with “special interests who obfuscate climate science, fight environmental regulation, oppose clean energy legislation, and seek to ease limits on industrial pollution,” the authors wrote.

The letter doesn’t mention any specific fossil fuel companies by name, but it does mention David Koch, an oil and manufacturing magnate who donates large sums of money to the political campaigns of conservative politicians, organizations that resist the idea that humans are contributing to climate change, and researchers who seek to provide evidence for such claims. Koch is also a trustee on the Smithsonian’s and the AMNH’s board of directors, and he regularly donates money and sponsors exhibits—such as the Smithsonian’s criticized exhibit about human evolution and climate change—at those institutions.

Michael Mann, a Penn State climate scientist who signed the letter, told The New York Times that donors like Koch misuse sponsorship of scientific institutions. “Cloaked in the garb of civic-mindedness, they launder their image while simultaneously and covertly influencing the content offered by those institutions,” Mann said.=

Another website, (organized in part by The Natural History Museum), launched a petition today (March 24) urging the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History and the AMNH to remove David Koch from their boards. As of this posting, the petition has attracted more than 42,000 signatures.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: JFR


Posts: 1

March 25, 2015

Article brings into question the funding of scientists who deny the loss of ozone in the upper atmosphere is the authentic cause of increased global warming. 

It is a sad time for humans because of the ease with which intelligent people can be so easily manipulated by a group of nefarious news editors.


Avatar of: JohnnyMorales


Posts: 31

March 25, 2015

At least scientists, some at least, no longer are standing on the sidelines, and are pushing back.

Too bad it took until the science skeptics took control of the relevent house and senate committees to change the very intelligent, but risk averse individuals in various fields of science to realize that standing on the sidelines didn't make them any safer. Instead it just gave them a ringside seat to what happens when you refuse to fight back in hopes of currying favor with the science skeptics that run the Republican party these days

Popular Now

  1. How to Separate the Science From the (Jerk) Scientist
  2. RNA Moves a Memory From One Snail to Another
  3. Could a Dose of Sunshine Make You Smarter?
  4. Sweden Cancels Agreement With Elsevier Over Open Access