NIH Opposes Editing Human Embryos

Following the publication of a study in which scientists used CRISPR to edit nonviable human embryos, the National Institutes of Health states it will not fund such research.

By | April 30, 2015

WIKIMEDIA, RWJMS IVF PROGRAMWhile the National Institutes of Health (NIH) supports the development of gene-editing technologies to produce knockout mouse models, develop new antimicrobials, and create HIV-resistant human immune cells, among other applications, the agency will not fund research seeking to edit human embryos, according to a statement released this week (April 29) from Director Francis Collins.

“The concept of altering the human germline in embryos for clinical purposes has been debated over many years from many different perspectives, and has been viewed almost universally as a line that should not be crossed,” Collins wrote. “Advances in technology have given us an elegant new way of carrying out genome editing, but the strong arguments against engaging in this activity remain.”

The statement was prompted by the publication of research in which scientists in China used the CRISPR-Cas9 system to edit nonviable human embryos, spurring much debate about the ethics of such manipulations. Many researchers believe that the technology is too immature to apply to human embryos. But not everyone agrees that the case is cut-and-dried.

“I am not in favor of the NIH policy and I believe that the Chinese paper shows a responsible way to move forward,” David Baltimore, a biologist at Caltech, told Nature. “But it is the will of Congress that there be no work with human embryos, and I assume that means even ones that are structurally defective.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Popular Now

  1. How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body
    Daily News How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body

    Millions of measurements from 23 people who consumed extra calories every day for a month reveal changes in proteins, metabolites, and gut microbiota that accompany shifts in body mass.

  2. That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute
    Daily News That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute

    The Broad Institute and Rockefeller University disagree over which scientists should be named as inventors on certain patents involving the gene-editing technology.

  3. Neurons Use Virus-Like Proteins to Transmit Information
  4. EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent
    The Nutshell EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent

    Shortly after ruling out the earliest priority dates on a foundational patent for CRISPR gene-editing technology, the European Patent Office rescinded the patent entirely—and more are likely to follow.