A recent toast to James Watson highlights a tolerance for bigotry many want excised from the scientific community.
Researchers use chemicals to manipulate the behavior of mice.
May 4, 2015|
BRYAN ROTH, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAA novel chemical tool allows researchers to turn neurons on and off in live mice, with effects that last up to an hour—far longer than the milliseconds of activity elicited by optogenetics technologies. A team from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (UNC), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) used the new technique to control the hunger and activity levels of mice. The results were published last week (April 30) in Neuron.
“This new chemogenetic tool will show us how brain circuits can be more effectively targeted to treat human disease,” coauthor Bryan Roth of the UNC School of Medicine said in a statement. “The problem facing medical science is that although most approved drugs target these brain receptors, it remains unclear how to selectively modulate specific kinds of receptors to effectively treat disease.”
The technique involves genetically altering neurons to carry “designer receptors exclusively activated by a designer drug,” or DREADDs, which fire in response to certain synthetic chemicals, then providing those molecules when neural activity in the region is desired. While DREADDs have been around for the better part of a decade, typically an individual neuron would carry just one receptor type, allowing it to be turned on or off, but not both. In the new study, researchers engineered the mice to have neurons that carry two receptors with opposing effects, so the activity could be manipulated in either direction—to make a mouse feel hungry or satiated, for example.
“With its new push-pull control, this tool sharpens the cutting edge of research aimed at improving our understanding of brain circuit disorders, such as schizophrenia and addictive behaviors,” said NIH Director Francis Collins said in a statement.
May 4, 2015
I wish that when articles are presented that show chemicals influencing how our brains "think" they would make it clear that the chemicals themselves don't "think" but are used by "thinking" individuals to change the feelings that have resulted from the "thinking" systems of the brains. In other words the chemicals represent the feelings that thinking systems have created - they don't create the feelings any more than a rock creates the feeling that it's hard, or that it hurts when it's thrown at your head. The rock had not intended to be either hard or thrown, and all other chemically constructed particles are equally at the mercy of their natural creators. (What that natural creator actually is remains as the bigger question!)