Celeste Kidd and Steven Piantadosi had sued the university over its handling of sexual harassment allegations made against colleague Florian Jaeger.
How to Clone a Mammoth, The Upright Thinkers, The Thirteenth Step, and Humankind
June 1, 2015|
Princeton University Press, April 2015
The majestic mammoth will never again roam the Earth. That is, unless we want it to. As University of California, Santa Cruz, ancient-DNA researcher Beth Shapiro explains in How to Clone a Mammoth, the scientific know-how exists to accomplish such goals of “de-extinction.”
From her front-row seat as one of the pioneers of ancient-DNA research, Shapiro explains the fieldwork, lab science, and prospective ecology involved with the so-far hypothetical endeavor. As paleogenomic science has progressed to the point that cloning a mammoth has become possible (sort of), such propositions have also attracted controversy. Shapiro calls herself “an enthusiastic realist,” writing that while recklessly resurrecting bygone species for Jurassic Park jollies would be “scientifically and ethically unjustified,” de-extinction has the potential to become “an important tool for conserving species and [restoring] habitats.” Breeding elephants that express some mammoth traits for cold hardiness, for example, might allow the pachyderms to be relocated to Arctic ecosystems to restore lost productivity there and aid in elephant conservation efforts.
Pantheon, May 2015
We’ve come a long way, baby. In the space of a few million years, primates have gone from squabbling in the canopy to walking on the Moon. But what is it about our ancestors and us that has made possible the meteoric rise of Homo sapiens to unprecedented cognitive heights? This is the question physicist Leonard Mlodinow asks and answers in his latest book, The Upright Thinkers.
Mlodinow traverses evolutionary time from our ratlike mammalian forebears to the emergence of genus Homo in Africa, from the dawn of civilization to the birth of quantum physics, in search of answers. He considers the nascent curiosity in our ancestors’ brains as the seed of Homo sapiens’s success. “While other animals are adept at surviving the harshness of the jungle or the savanna, we seem more suited to sitting in a café, sipping mochas,” Mlodinow writes. “That sitting, though, is not to be underestimated. For as we sit, we think, and we question.”
As the human mind flowered, so too did culture and civilization. Modern humans continue to harvest the fruits of thinking and questioning by some of the greatest minds in human history. As Mlodinow details, the unquenchable curiosity morphed into science, a way of seeing the world that has in turn shaped our cultures, our bodies, and our concepts of the universe’s functioning.
Columbia University Press, May 2015
In the past 25 years, modern science has made quantum leaps in understanding the neurological roots of addiction. But because of humanity’s long relationship with the disease, many nonscientific approaches have become entrenched in our treatment of addiction. These older methods and newer non–evidence-based therapies, argues NIH addiction researcher Markus Heilig in The Thirteenth Step, need to yield to approaches informed by the avalanche of data continually being uncovered by today’s scientists.
“The time has come to bring together the everyday realities of addictive disorders and the emerging science and available evidence,” Heilig writes.
Through a series of case studies of real patients, the author elucidates the brain structure and function that underlie relapse, drug-seeking behavior, and other addiction-related phenomena. But as complete as the science seems, there are still obstacles to implementing therapies based on its findings. “Prejudice, stigma, and financial interests conspire to prevent science-based treatments from reaching patients who need them,” Heilig writes.
Alexander H. Harcourt
Pegasus Books, June 2015
Humanity spreads, quiltlike, across the globe, different sizes, shapes, colors, and textures evolving into a diverse patchwork of peoples and customs. UC Davis anthropologist Alexander Harcourt celebrates this diversity and dissects its origins in Humankind. Evolution, whether biological or cultural, doesn’t occur in a vacuum. There is intimate feedback between the physical environment, climate, and cohabiting plants, animals, and microbes that shapes and prunes the tree of life down to the twig of each species. And humans are no exception.
As species of Homo spread out of Africa to encounter new and different ecosystems, they embarked on a slow and steady journey that would mold different phenotypes, genotypes, and cultures from the same starting material. Harcourt retraces this process, bringing the latest science to bear in painting his dynamic portrait of human biogeography.
The author succeeds in drawing parallels between humans and the other species with which we share the planet. “In humanity’s distribution around the world, and in the biological explanations for that distribution, humans show many of the same patterns as other animals,” Harcourt writes. “All species are unique—they would not be separate species if they were not. But as regards the biology behind our species’ global distribution, our biogeography, we humans are often not obviously unique.”