The chemist examined the role of activated oxygen molecules in biological processes.
Based on the structure of fossilized skulls and ear bones, researchers learn that early hominins heard sounds best between the frequencies that humans and chimpanzees do.
September 29, 2015|
WIKIMEDIA, JOSÉ BRAGA
Early hominin species Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus, which lived around 2 million years ago, possessed hearing capabilities largely similar to modern-day chimpanzees but with a few differences that made their sense more akin to that of humans, according to a recent study. The results were reported last week (September 25) in Science Advances.
“We know that the hearing patterns, or audiograms, in chimpanzees and humans are distinct because their hearing abilities have been measured in the laboratory in living subjects,” study coauthor Rolf Quam of Binghamton University in New York said in a press release. “So we were interested in finding out when this human-like hearing pattern first emerged during our evolutionary history.”
Quam and an international team of researchers studied the anatomy of the ear in three complete fossilized specimens, as well as several partial specimens, from South Africa. The team reconstructed the size and relative proportions of up to six different structures—such as the stapes, a middle ear bone—using 3-D CT scans. The researchers then used a published model to predict how the early hominins may have heard, based on these measurements.
Both species of early hominin evolved an anatomy that allowed them to hear sounds at slightly higher frequencies than chimpanzees, best in the 1.0 kHz to 3.5 kHz range. In comparison, chimpanzees can hear sounds best between 1.0 kHz and 3.0 kHz. Humans can typically hear sounds best between 1.0 kHz and 4.5 kHz; this range encompasses most sounds formed in spoken language.
“[The early hominins] didn’t hear as well as humans, and they are more like chimps,” Quam told The New York Times. But the researchers speculated that the changes in hearing anatomy over time were driven by a lifestyle spent on the open savanna, where short-range communication would have been favored.
“Hearing abilities are closely tied with verbal communication,” Quam wrote at The Conversation. “By figuring out when certain hearing capacities emerged during our evolutionary history, we might be able to shed some light on when spoken language started to evolve.”
September 29, 2015
Very interesting, thanks a lot. Many traditional paleo-anthropologists assume without evidence that australopiths ("hominins") are more closely related to us than to chimps or gorillas (nowhere proven & in fact wrong IMO, see e.g. my Hum.Evol.papers), and some still assume that the australopiths ran over the open African plains (no doubt very wrong). What did the article really say, without these anthropocentric preassumptions? Australop.africanus-robustus' hearing was more Pan- than Homo-like (corroborating my view that the S.African australopiths might have been more related to Pan than to Homo, and much more to Pan than to Gorilla, see my 1994 & 1996 Hum.Evol.papers). Their hearing might have been adapted to open landscapes, esp.the wetlands where we know most australopiths lived (e.g. Reed 1998), but not to dry savannas (google aquarboreal).