From extending lifespan to bolstering the immune system, the drug’s effects are only just beginning to be understood.
With a card game, researchers make light of the “wacky aspects of scientific research.”
January 29, 2016|
© “LAB WARS” BY CAEZAR AL-JASSAR AND KULY HEER; GRAPHIC DESIGN BY CRIMZON STUDIO, ILLUSTRATIONS BY NIZAR ILMANWould you poison a competing scientist’s tea? Steal another lab’s research secrets? You can, in a card game being developed by Caezar Al-Jassar and Kuly Heer.
Al-Jassar, a structural biologist at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, and Heer, a psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire, enjoy playing games when they’re not in the lab. Inspired by anecdotes told to them by friends and colleagues as well as stories reported in Michael Brooks’s 2013 book Free Radicals: The Secret Anarchy of Science, the pair decided to create a game of their own while on holiday in Spain last summer.
“Lab Wars,” which is suitable for both scientists and nonscientists, over-exaggerates the realities of lab life, with a focus on career-building and competition. Players adopt characters—a grad student, postdoc, professor, or lab tech, among others—and scheme to gain academic prestige.
When Al-Jassar and Heer first demoed the game, at a December tabletop gaming convention called Dragonmeet, one man returned to the Lab Wars booth twice—first with his son, and then with his daughter. “He wanted to show them what science was like,” Al-Jassar told The Scientist. “Everyone has this notion that scientists are all good people and trying to do good for humanity, but there’s also this very small minority [who] have a dark side and try to screw each other over.”
“Often, it’s academic rivalry” that leads scientists to misbehave, said Brooks. “There’s no prize for second place in science—that’s one of the big problems. Sometimes people are willing to go the extra mile [to win].”
The ability to sabotage competing players ranked highest in evaluations by testers of early prototypes of the game. “Play testers liked that the fact it’s grounded in reality,” said Al-Jassar. “The actions they were playing in the game are [predominantly] based in real-life events.”
Or, at least, real-life rumors. Like tea poisoning.
“We call it the ‘radioactive sabotage’ card,” Al-Jassar said, based on gossip he once heard about a scientist spiking a competitor’s beverage with a radioactive isotope. (The Lab Wars player who wields ‘radioactive sabotage’ forces his opponent to skip a turn.)
There are cards for espionage, tampering with another player’s lab equipment, and so on. Points are awarded for such sabotage. Then there are the personal conflicts: the department’s emeritus professor blocks a principal investigator from attaining full professorship; a new graduate student demands a postdoc’s time for training. But it’s not all cutthroat: players may be dealt “fortuitous finds” and participate in teambuilding, earning them additional points.
Al-Jassar and Heer plan to initiate a Kickstarter fundraising campaign in June. If successful, they hope to deliver Lab Wars to supporters by the end of the year.
“People think science is a nonhuman endeavor. It’s almost robotic in people’s minds: you have a hypothesis, then you do an experiment, and then your data comes out. Of course it’s not like that, this is human beings at work,” said Brooks. “Human beings are fiercely competitive. . . . So I’m not surprised at all that people enjoy watching scientists compete with each other, that they like them to play a bit dirty.”
February 1, 2016
I think the creators should include a character card of a journal editor. just sayin'
February 1, 2016
Why are we making doing wrong "fun." So many of our young people grow up with "games" that have them killing people. No wonder so many of them revert to that when they are frustrated. What have they been taught? How to build a business? no! Proper morality? No! How to do Science ethically? NO!
This would only be a proper game if the person who did the wrong is suitably punished for that deed. No we don't do that. We are proud of something that encourages wrong doing and gives people ldeas of other things they can do.
It doesn't sound like you are catching those who do wrong and stopping them. You are praising and elevating the dark side. What will the players learn about science? How to do it wrong. You aree elevating wrong to a good. What will science look like in 10 years?
February 11, 2016
Hi Mirellab! Thanks for the suggestion! I'm Caezar, co-designer of Lab Wars. We've had many people give suggestions on our website (www.lab-wars.com) if you sign up to our newsletter you'll be able to suggest more! Thanks again!
February 11, 2016
hi "What!?!" thanks for your contribution to the debate. I am Caezar the co-designer of lab wars. Ultimately, at the end of the day it is only a game. I think if someone is hard working enough to become a scientist they will also realise this. The game does punish players who sabotage but you may choose to avoid sabotaging all together if you wish. Thanks again for your contribution!