Will Organs-in-a-Dish Ever Replace Animal Models?

Increasingly sophisticated tissue organoids can model many aspects of disease, but animal studies retain a fundamental role in research, scientists say. 

By | July 19, 2016

Cross-section of cerebral organoid; All cells in blue, neural stem cells in red, and neurons in greenMADELINE A. LANCASTERFrom mini brains to mini kidneys, an increasing number of organ models can now be grown in vitro. Some of these “organoids” can even perform certain functions of the human body in both health and disease, reducing the need for animal models. But organoid-based models still can’t fully recapitulate complex aspects of physiology that can only be studied in whole organisms.

“I believe that [organoid models] will replace a lot of current animal experimentation,” Hans Clevers of the Hubrecht Institute in Utrecht, Netherlands, one of the field’s pioneers, wrote in an email to The Scientist. However, “a living organism is more than the sum of its parts,” he added. “There will always be the need for confirmation of any finding . . . in vivo.”

Organoids are three-dimensional miniature organs grown in vitro from adult or embryonic stem cells under chemical and physical conditions that mimic the human body. Clevers and colleagues grew the first mini guts in 2009; since then, researchers have succeeded in growing mini brains, kidneys, livers, pancreases, and prostate glands (see “Orchestrating Organoids,” The Scientist, September 1, 2015).

One area where organoids are well suited to reduce the use of animal models is toxicology, Clevers and others have noted.

Many drugs prove successful in mouse models only to fail in human trials. Organoids, on the other hand, can be grown from human stem cells. “The fact that [the cells are] human is really important,” James Wells, a professor of pediatrics at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center whose lab develops stomach organoids, told The Scientist. “There can be very different responses to drugs in a mouse and a human.”

Another advantage of organoids is that they can be used for personalized medicine.

Clevers and colleagues are currently growing organoids from cells of people with cystic fibrosis (CF) to determine if they will benefit from certain drugs, and other groups are doing similar studies involving cancer patients, he said. Clevers’s lab has also done work using CRISPR/Cas9 to correct genetic defects in vitro (see “With CRISPR, Modeling Disease in Mini Organs,” The Scientist, May 6, 2016).

Organoids are also being used to model developmental diseases that would be impossible or unethical to study in humans. Developmental biologist Jürgen Knoblich of the Institute of Molecular Biotechnology in Vienna and colleagues have succeeded in growing cerebral organoids that reproduce features of a growing brain, including individual cell layers (see “Lab-Grown Model Brains,” The Scientist, August 28, 2013). The researchers grew organoids from reprogrammed skin cells from a patient with microcephaly, a disorder that results in an abnormally small brain.

Cell biologist Melissa Little of Murdoch Childrens Research Institute in Australia and colleagues have developed kidney organoids to model human kidney disease. This approach is especially useful for modeling rare genetic diseases, Little told The Scientist. “In addition, using the patient’s own cells is going to give you all the genes that are modified [in the disorder],” she added. “You’ll never get that in a mouse.”

But for more complex diseases that involve multiple organ systems—such as diabetes or chronic kidney disease—it’s unlikely that organoids will ever fully replace animal models, researchers say.

“Organoids are complementary rather than competing with animal research,” Knoblich told The Scientist. “It’s an illusion to think they can be used to completely replace animal research.”

Meanwhile, some scientists are concerned that the push to use organoids could make it more difficult to pursue animal research.

“Switzerland is extremely strict on the use of animals, and it’s getting worse and worse,” developmental biologist Denis Duboule of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland told The Scientist. “There is a danger in this: grant agencies could say ‘Why don’t you use organoids, not mice?’” But the reality is, while organoids can model some aspects of development very well, scientists must ultimately validate the findings in animals, Duboule said.

“Organoids are a fantastic new tool to do research,” he said. But when it comes to animal models, “I don’t see it as a replacement,” he said.

Organoids come with their own set of ethical considerations. Bioethicist Arthur Caplan of New York University Langone Medical Center said he worries that researchers will rush to use organoids in lieu of animal models before the former have been properly validated. “My concern is, out of a desire to reduce animal use, to save money, and to avoid experimentation in humans, we rush into a new world of organoids and don’t do the proper calibrations,” he told The Scientist. “I’m not against [these models], but we have to proceed with extreme caution.”

Law professor and bioethicist Henry Greely of Stanford University agreed. “I do think organoids have the potential for limiting the use of nonhuman animals, and that is good thing,” Greely told The Scientist. But “there really is a tradeoff between how well a particular model reflects human organs and tissues in humans,” which may vary depending on the organ or condition being studied, he said.

One issue that could arise with the use of human organoids is the source of the cells. Some organoids use embryonic stem cells—which could raise objections from religious groups, Greely said. This problem can be partially circumvented with the use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which are reprogrammed from adult cells, but it’s still too soon to say whether these are an adequate replacement for embryonic cells.

Another potential issue is the type of tissue being generated. People are “not going to get upset about making a pancreas,” Greely said. “But the closer you come to making a human brain, the more issues get raised.” Growing human gonads in a dish could also pose concerns, he added.

Then there’s the possibility of creating human and animal chimaeras—research some scientists are already pursuing. For example, organs such as fetal human hearts or livers could be grown in pigs or sheep and then transplanted back into humans, reducing the need for organ donors. The US National Institutes of Health announced last September that it would not fund this type of research until it had a chance to consider the possible repercussions.

Ultimately, the hope is that it may be possible to culture entire organs that could be transplanted into humans. However, most researchers believe this goal is a long way off. While they may not ever reproduce the complexity of a living animal, organoid models are continually improving.

“I think it’s a promising area, but like anything, it needs to be proven,” said Greely.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: JToeppen

JToeppen

Posts: 37

July 20, 2016

Nanolithography, stereolithography, optical addressing, photo-optical stimulation, and bio-compatable interfaces allow for a new dawning of innovation.  We will decide it is more sensible to grow meat than animals for consumption.  We will engineer life support for and artificial tissues that are generic or personalized.  Only time and money stand in the way....of building our dreams, be they planned visions or nighmares, choices between utopia or oblivion.  Resistance might be futile....?

 

Popular Now

  1. Thousands of Mutations Accumulate in the Human Brain Over a Lifetime
  2. Two Dozen House Republicans Do an About-Face on Tuition Tax
  3. Putative Gay Genes Identified, Questioned
    The Nutshell Putative Gay Genes Identified, Questioned

    A genomic interrogation of homosexuality turns up speculative links between genetic elements and sexual orientation, but researchers say the study is too small to be significant. 

  4. Can Young Stem Cells Make Older People Stronger?
FreeShip