HIV Spread from Haiti to NYC in 1970, “Patient Zero” Not to Blame

Whole-genome sequencing of preserved blood samples provides the clearest picture to date of the virus’s arrival and spread in the U.S.

By Ben Andrew Henry | October 26, 2016


The first reports of the disease that would later be known as HIV/AIDS came in 1981, when AIDS-related conditions were already on the rise, particularly among gay men. HIV can linger in the body for a decade or longer before the onset of AIDS, so experts have conjectured that the virus arrived in the country years before it was recognized. But precisely when and where has been a matter of contentious debate. Almost all US samples of the virus come from after 1981, which has stymied direct study of the earliest cases of person to person viral transmission.

In a paper published today (October 26) in Nature, a team of scientists presents eight complete genomes of the HIV virus from blood samples taken in 1978 and 1979, making it the first comprehensive genomic study of pre-1981 HIV in North America. Using molecular clocks and phylogenetic analysis, the researchers determined the virus arrived in New York City from Haiti around 1970, then spread to San Francisco and elsewhere in the country during the mid-1970s.

One of the blood samples came from the man widely identified as “Patient Zero” of the AIDS epidemic, Gaëtan Dugas. The virus recovered from his blood falls in the middle of the US HIV evolutionary tree, not at the base, clearing him as the culprit of initial HIV transmission in the U.S.

The researchers also noted, as one of the study coauthors previously reported, that US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) investigators originally referred to Dugas as “Patient O” to indicate he resided “Outside of California,” never intending to identify him as the first case of HIV infection in the country. But this label was misinterpreted during the preparation of a manuscript, and as a result of a typographical error, Dugas entered the scientific literature as “Patient 0.”

“What we’ve done here is gone back in time and looked at archival samples,” study coauthor Michael Worobey of the University of Arizona told reporters during a press briefing this week (October 25). The samples, he explained, came from studies of hepatitis B virus among gay men in New York City and San Francisco. The team screened thousands of preserved samples before selecting 53 with which to attempt recovery of the HIV genome.

“Even though the samples come from the late 1970s, an early time point long before anyone noticed AIDS, [they] contain a large amount of genetic diversity—so much genetic diversity that they could not have arisen from the late 1970s,” said Worobey. “It’s direct evidence of many years of circulation of the virus in the United States before HIV and AIDS were finally recognized.”

He added that “old samples like this, serum samples, are notoriously difficult to recover virus genetic material from,” as viral RNA degrades over time.

To extract genomes of the HIV strain responsible for the North America outbreak (HIV-1 group M subtype B), Worobey and colleagues developed what they call an RNA “jackhammering” technique. The approach involves amplifying short fragments of RNA in multiple pools using panels of many different primers, so that the partial genomes created in each pool overlap with one another. Together, these short fragments across separate pools fill in the full genome.

“The technical approach is really a tour de force,” said Steven Wolinsky, an HIV researcher at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Evanston, Illinois, who was not involved in the study. “The data are robust and the analyses are just striking.”

By comparing the eight recovered genomes with those of reference HIV genomes, the researchers were able to construct an evolutionary tree of subtype B. HIV genomes from patients in San Francisco are nested in the tree as descendants of the viruses found in patients from New York City. In addition, the New York City strain is more genetically diverse than the San Francisco one, indicating that the former variant is likely older. Subtype B genomes from Haiti were the most diverse of all, the researchers found, and are likely ancestors to US strains. Molecular clocks date the arrival of HIV in Haiti from Africa, where the virus originated, to the 1960s.

Earlier studies identified HIV in blood samples from the late 70s and had produced partial genomes from those samples, noted Eric Delwart, an investigator at the San Francisco–based Blood Systems Research Institute who published one such study. But previous analyses relied on PCR techniques, he explained, hindering accurate dating of viral introductions or rigorous phylogenetic comparison. Additionally, disputes previously arose over whether HIV traveled to the U.S. from Haiti, or vice versa.

Historians and scientists have long dismissed the characterization of Dugas as the source of HIV’s spread in North America, said study coauthor Richard McKay, a historian at the University of Cambridge, U.K. But when HIV was first recognized, investigators had limited knowledge of the virus, and some media coverage steered public understanding of the epidemic without sound scientific backing, McKay said.

Dugas, a Canadian flight attendant, was part of an early CDC study that showed HIV could be transmitted through sexual contact. He provided the names of a greater proportion of his previous sexual partners than others involved in the study, and was therefore central to the transmission network analysis. McKay pointed out that the study was never intended to trace the origins of the epidemic. However, singling out the actions of one person provided an enticing narrative in media accounts, most notably Randy Shilts’s And the Band Played On.

“It seems to be a recurrent formula, when reporting on epidemics, to track down the patient zero, scrutinize their actions, and sniff around for immoral deeds,” McKay said. “There’s a tendency to place blame.”

Additionally, given that blame and harmful stereotypes were frequently attributed to Haitians for their perceived role in spreading HIV, Worobey stressed during the press briefing that “tracing the origin of an epidemic is not the same as placing blame. . . . No one should be blamed for the spread of a virus that nobody even know about.”

The precise point of transmission from Haiti to New York City remains “an open question,” Worobey added. “It could have been a person of any nationality.”

M. Worobey et al., “1970s and ‘Patient 0’ HIV-1 genomes illuminate early HIV/AIDS history in North America,” Nature, doi:10.1038/nature19827, 2016. 

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: Chris Jennings

Chris Jennings

Posts: 1

March 12, 2017

The findings of this phylogenic analysis discredited the ill-fated “Patient Zero” introduced by Randy Shilts’s And the Band Played On.  Worobey maintains, however, that HIV entered the USA via Haiti, where it arrived from Africa.  In contrast to that view, extensive epidemiological evidence suggests the Africa-Haiti-USA historical narrative is just as incorrect as the narrative regarding Patient Zero.

We posted a response to the Worobey article on the Nature website, as kindly suggested by the Editors, citing a limited portion of available epidemiological data refuting this concept:

The version of this response, posted here on THE SCIENTIST, contains the full complement of 13 references rather than just the 3 references allowed by NATURE.

My comment to Nature follows extensive review of approximately 5,000 medical and scientific articles spanning 30 years, and contributing to three books on HIV/AIDS that I have authored:

Response to Worebey et al.

Worobey and colleagues describe the genetic diversity of HIV infection in the USA and use the increasing diversity to pinpoint the spread of AIDS from New York to the greater United States 1.  Importantly, they comprehensively reject “Patient Zero” as the founding infective patient and thus correct the mistaken historical record following Shilts 2.  Nevertheless, Worobey maintains that HIV entered the USA via Haiti, where it arrived from Africa.

There is good reason to believe the Africa-Haiti-USA historical narrative is as incorrect as the narrative around patient zero. The evidence suggests that HIV might have spread from the USA to the rest of the world 3.  For example, 10-24% of the first AIDS patients in Haiti had visited the USA or Europe, but none had visited Africa 4. 5.  Of those that had never left Haiti, many were infected by tourists from the USA and Europe 6. Worobey et al. argue that patient H6 first brought HIV to the USA in 1981, but that misses the possibility that HIV had already arrived in Haiti from the USA 7.

Throughout the world, early in the epidemic, the greatest risk factor for contracting AIDS was sexual contact with a gay man from the United States.  This finding was consistent among incipient AIDS populations throughout Denmark 8, United Kingdom 9, France 10, West Germany 11, and South Africa 12 as well as in the Caribbean 13. A substantial portion of the first AIDS patients in all these locations were gay men who had homosexual contact with a man from the United States; such homosexual contact occurring either inside or outside the United States.

In sum, the bulk of the epidemiological evidence points to the migration of HIV from New York City throughout the United States, which Worobey et al. describe, but also to the rest of the world, which Worobey et al. miss.


Chris Jennings
Health Alert Communications
    HIV/AIDS - The Facts and The Fiction
    HIV/AIDS in South Africa - The Facts and The Fiction

Stuart Derbyshire, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
National University of Singapore


1    Worobey, M., et al. (2016). 1970s and 'Patient 0' HIV-1 genomes illuminate early HIV/AIDS history in North America. Nature, 539(7627), 98-101.

2    Shilts R. And the Band Played On. New York: St. Martin's Press; 1987.

3    Jennings, C. (2012). HIV/AIDS - THE FACTS AND THE FICTION. Health Alert Communications. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

4    Johnson WD, Jr., Pape JW. AIDS in Haiti. Immunol Ser. 1989;44:65-78.

5    Guerin JM, Malebranche R, Elie R, et al. Acquired immune deficiency syndrome: specific aspects of the disease in Haiti. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;437:254-263.

6    Deschamps MD. AIDS in the Caribbean. Arch AIDS Res. 1988;2(1):51-56.

7    Pape, J. W., et al. (1983). Characteristics of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in Haiti. N Engl J Med, 309(16), 945-950.

8    Thomsen HK, Jacobsen M, Malchow-Moller A. Kaposi sarcoma among homosexual men in Europe. Lancet. Sep 26 1981;2(8248):688.

9    du Bois RM, Branthwaite MA, Mikhail JR, Batten JC. Primary Pneumocystis carinii and cytomegalovirus infections. Lancet. Dec 12 1981;2(8259):1339.

10    Rozenbaum W, Coulaud JP, Saimot AG, Klatzmann D, Mayaud C, Carette MF. Multiple opportunistic infection in a male homosexual in France. Lancet. Mar 6 1982;1(8271):572-573.

11    L'Age-Stehr J, Kunze R, Koch MA. AIDS in West Germany. Lancet. Dec 10 1983;2(8363):1370-1371.

12    Ras GJ, Simson IW, Anderson R, Prozesky OW, Hamersma T. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. A report of 2 South African cases. S Afr Med J. Jul 23 1983;64(4):140-142.

13    Farmer P. AIDS and accusation: Haiti and the geography of blame. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press; 1992.

Popular Now

  1. Prominent Salk Institute Scientist Inder Verma Resigns
  2. Anheuser-Busch Won’t Fund Controversial NIH Alcohol Study
  3. North American Universities Increasingly Cancel Publisher Packages
  4. CRISPR Efficiency Tied to Cancer-Causing Process