Genotyping “Surrogates” Misdiagnoses Deadly Heart Condition

Family members with a certain gene variant had unnecessary interventions, highlighting the potential hazards of precision medicine.

By | November 2, 2016

WIKIMEDIA, BRYAN BRANDENBURGAfter a teenage boy died of cardiac arrest, family members underwent genetic testing to see if they had any variants that might predispose them to a similar fate. This so-called surrogate testing—sequencing the genes of relatives—identified what doctors thought was the genetic culprit of the boy’s death, and more than two dozen family members were given a diagnosis of a serious heart condition. But a reanalysis of the family’s genes and heart health, published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings this week (October 31), concludes that they were misdiagnosed, highlighting what the authors consider the “devastating consequences” of surrogate testing.

“This is the proverbial dark side of genetic testing and precision medicine,” paper coauthor Michael Ackerman,  a genetic cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic, told STAT News.

Ackerman and colleagues met the family members when they came to the Mayo Clinic for a second opinion. The family members had been diagnosed with long QT (LQT) syndrome, an inherited cardiac disease, based initially on a genetic test given to the brother of the boy who had died. The test showed the brother had a variant in a gene called KCNQ1, and tests of other family members showed they, too, shared the sequence. The brother even received an implanted defibrillator.

But the family members, including the boy’s brother, seemed to have healthy hearts. And when Ackerman sequenced the blood of the boy who died, he found that the boy didn’t have the variant in KCNQ1. The tragedy of this family’s loss “was compounded further by a subsequent journey that resulted in the misdiagnosis . . . in more than 20 relatives and treatment with an implantable defibrillator, which has delivered 2 inappropriate shocks, in the decedent’s otherwise healthy and asymptomatic brother,” Ackerman and colleagues wrote in their paper.

The researchers urged doctors to take caution in interpreting the results of genetic tests. In particular, they wrote, surrogate testing “is a dangerous and potentially misleading substitute for genetic testing of the dead.” Additionally, variants should be considered in the context of clinical observations. “Results of genetic testing should be viewed through the phenotypic lens previously derived from necropsy findings in the deceased and clinical test results from the living,” the authors wrote.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: spritrig

spritrig

Posts: 6

November 2, 2016

Correlation does not imply causation.  Of course family members would hundreds of millions if not over a billion variations.  Of course a diseaase causing variation would have thousands of linked variations.

Avatar of: spritrig

spritrig

Posts: 6

November 2, 2016

Correlation does not imply causation.  Of course family members would share hundreds of millions if not over a billion variations.  Of course a diseaase causing variation would have many thousands of variations.  

Popular Now

  1. Thousands of Mutations Accumulate in the Human Brain Over a Lifetime
  2. 2017 Top 10 Innovations
    Features 2017 Top 10 Innovations

    From single-cell analysis to whole-genome sequencing, this year’s best new products shine on many levels.

  3. Search for Life on the Red Planet
  4. Two Dozen House Republicans Do an About-Face on Tuition Tax
FreeShip