The chemist examined the role of activated oxygen molecules in biological processes.
Freshman Congressman Matt Gaetz (R-FL) says that abolishing the Environmental Protection Agency will provide more “effective and efficient protection.”
February 6, 2017|
WIKIMEDIA, BABOONXFreshman Representative Matt Gaetz (R-FL), introduced a bill into the House’s Science, Space, and Technology Committee on Friday (February 3) that would essentially terminate the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). “To better protect the environment we should abolish the EPA and downstream resources to states for more effective & efficient protection,” Gaetz posted on his Facebook page on February 2.
As of this afternoon (February 6) the text of “H.R. 861 – To terminate the Environmental Protection Agency” was not available. But several of Gaetz’s GOP colleagues signed on to cosponsor the bill. Barry Loudermilk, who has represented Georgia’s 11th District since 2015, Thomas Massie, a Representative from Kentucky, and Steven Palazzo, who has represented Mississippi since 2011, all signed on to the bill.
“The Constitution reserves lawmaking authority for the legislative branch, not unelected bureaucrats in the executive branch,” Massie said in a statement to The Louisville Courier-Journal on Friday. “The EPA makes rules that undermine the voice of the American people and threaten jobs in Kentucky.”
This is not the first Congressional attempt to abolish the EPA. In 2011, two GOP lawmakers, Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) and Newt Gingrich (R-GA), introduced legislation to terminate the federal agency. Both of those bills failed to make it through the Senate.
In any case, a bill calling to abolish the EPA is unlikely to make it through the legislature. “It's hard to imagine Congress being willing to do so, and the American public would almost certainly virulently oppose such a move,” University of California-Los Angeles Law School professor Ann Carlson told Bloomberg BNA back in March.
“This is just red meat to their supporters, of course, and cannot be unilaterally accomplished,” Jody Freeman, Harvard Law School professor, told Bloomberg BNA. “Presidents can ask Congress for skeletal agency budgets, try to stymie or slow agency work or control them and weaken regulation through centralized White House review, but they cannot eliminate agencies or zero out budgets by fiat.”
February 7, 2017
Last time I looked, the air didn't seem to confined to one state. Neither did the water for that matter.