Opinion: After We March

How to become—and stay—involved in science policy 

By Sheril Kirshenbaum | March 16, 2017

WIKIMEDIA, KRASSOTKINGiven instances in which the current administration has opposed facts—scientific or otherwise—and ongoing assaults on science, next month’s March for Science is a worthy first step toward getting those who care about research and American innovation engaged and ready to act. However, what’s most crucial will be what happens after the event.

Going forward, we must continue to find tangible ways to push for science’s inclusion in the policymaking process. There’s no single prescription to stay involved, so I’ll outline a few suggestions here and encourage readers get creative.

As a former congressional staffer, I know that concrete efforts, such as making the rounds on Capitol Hill in person to meet with representatives, really matter. If you can, take a few days to visit Senate and House offices to outline why the issues most important to you depend upon incorporating the best available science into legislation. When you meet with staffers, it’s vital that you don’t lose their attention by talking about p-values and statistics. Instead, remember to make clear arguments related to the economy, national security, geopolitical stability, and more. You have the power to make science matter to everyone listening, regardless of his or her background and expertise.

If you can’t get to Capitol Hill, you might visit representatives in your home district or dial their offices by phone. A constituent call generally has more weight than an email, although any form of contact to make your voice heard can make a difference.

In the past, I’ve reached out to Congressional staffers personally, volunteering to brief them on science-related topics on which they may not be up to speed. Remember, most office staff members do not have scientific backgrounds, so developing a relationship, building trust, and offering assistance at translating complex topics may be more welcome and appreciated than you anticipate. Also, take time to listen. When you understand your audience’s priorities, you can tell a more compelling narrative that will appeal to their interests and concerns.

Most importantly, it will be vital to grow public engagement on science-related issues beyond the scientific community. We need to keep finding forums to tell our stories in ways that resonate with those outside of the ivory towers of academia. For some, this might mean writing an opinion for a local or national newspaper. For others, it could be visiting a school, library, science café or TEDx-like conference to talk about the significance of your field of research.  Consider starting a group that meets in your own neighborhood to discuss how to make science a priority at the local level. Bilingual researchers can help by translating scientific information into languages other than English.

While we tend to focus our attention on what’s happening nationally, local politics often affect us most. Pay close attention to the science-related issues where you live. Maybe it’s lead in the drinking water, renewable energy initiatives, or food deserts. Look closely and you’ll find something that speaks to your expertise where you might contribute as a volunteer or an educator.

Finally, if you’re passionate for change, consider running for office at the city or state level. Don’t know where to begin? Look up one of the many groups seeking to train scientists to enter political races in 2018 and 2020. If you succeed, you’ll get to be involved directly in the decision-making process and ensure that science is central to how local governments tackle the issues that impact our health, environment, technology, and future.

If you can make it to the March for Science in Washington, DC—or a satellite march around the world—I encourage you to join in. A global show of solidarity is certainly a good start. But make sure your efforts don’t end there. Indeed, our movement is just getting started.

Sheril Kirshenbaum is the executive director of ScienceDebate, which is a partner of the March for Science.

See “Science Policy in 2017

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: True Scientist

True Scientist

Posts: 59

March 16, 2017

I like the picture included, it is a really great symbol that reminds many others similar ones. Just add some stars and may be a hammer...

Avatar of: Mike Holloway

Mike Holloway

Posts: 29

Replied to a comment from True Scientist made on March 16, 2017

March 17, 2017

"I like the picture included, it is a really great symbol that reminds many others similar ones. Just add some stars and may be a hammer..."

Which is an ironic statement since it was Russia that perfected the disasterous process of replacing peer review with having politicians dictate science research and conclusions.  Its a Russian inwention.  The Liar in Chief continues to emulate his Russian heroes. 

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 237

March 17, 2017

Ms. Kirshenbaum sets a correct, long-term pathway towards engagement with facts, evidence, and the altruism science naturally provides.  We cannot let the amateurs push their agenda of ignorance to control the masses.  This is a permanent effort that must be part of every scientist's and engineer's being.  Most of us got into this science game for the good we can do.  Certainly, the overtime involved, the struggle for employment, and the low pay weren't the real attracters.  

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 237

Replied to a comment from Mike Holloway made on March 17, 2017

March 17, 2017

The current state of affairs to purge the opposition scientific intelligencia is quite Stalinistic, though only their livelihoods will die.

Popular Now

  1. Two University of Rochester Professors Resign in Protest
  2. Dartmouth Professor Investigated for Sexual Misconduct Retires
  3. Theranos Leaders Indicted For Fraud
    The Nutshell Theranos Leaders Indicted For Fraud

    Federal prosecutors filed criminal charges that allege the company’s promise to revolutionize blood testing swindled investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars and put patients in danger.

  4. Koko the Signing Gorilla Dies at 46