March for Science: Dispatches from Chicago

The Scientist's Kerry Grens is in Chicago, covering the demonstration designed to celebrate the research enterprise and advocate for evidence-based policymaking.

By | April 22, 2017

Between the shore of Lake Michigan and the skyline of downtown Chicago, thousands of science supporters gathered for the March for Science. Stretching down Columbus Drive, the crowd was silent during speeches before the planned procession, except for intermittent chants of, "Chicago! Science! Chicago! Science!" led by march organizer Kristian Aloma.

Crowds at the March for Science in Chicago, April 22, 2017 KERRY GRENS

A handful of speakers took the stage before attendees headed south on the march route. Although there was a substantial number of anti-Trump signs among the crowds, speeches stuck to nonpartisan topics: respect for data and the importance of diversity in scientific endeavors. "Science is for everyone and is done by everyone," Garry Cooper, the CEO of Rheaply, a company that helps researchers share resources and find collaborators, told the cheering crowd.

"Science is an opportunity, an opportunity to learn and grow and contribute no matter who you are, no matter where you're from, and no matter what you look like." —Garry Cooper, CEO of Rheaply

Crowds at the March for Science in Chicago, April 22, 2017KERRY GRENS

The science march in Chicago was was a blend of scientists and nonscientists alike. Peggy Mikros, a caterer, came up from the south side of the city because she said she cares about the environment and "science is everything." The event has inspired her to continue to advocate for science.KERRY GRENS

"I've never done this and I am so excited to be here." —Peggy Mikros, caterer from Chicago

Susan McCarthy, a retired industrial engineer, made a pink brain cap out of an old volleyball. She came to the march because she's concerned decisions and policies are not being made based on scientific evidence.KERRY GRENS

"I'm worried about the EPA. . . . I really think that though the EPA is not perfect, it still needs funding and it still needs to exist." —Susan McCarthy, retired industrial engineer

Samuel Stupp (middle, in a black coat) a chemist at Northwestern University, with some of his studentsKERRY GRENS

Samuel Stupp, a chemist who develops biomaterials at Northwestern University, joined the march with several dozen students. Like some other marchers, Stupp said he believes the event would not have happened had Hillary Clinton won the election. He said that in a way the March for Science is a partisan event, but that nonetheless, the subject is a bipartisan cause. 

His concern with current political leadership is that policies, including research funding, are being based on opinions and political issues, and not scientific facts, particularly with regard to climate change, alternative energies, and healthcare.

The event in Chicago was a first for Stupp, who said he hopes that by bringing his students it will encourage them to be active in defending in science. "After today I will advocate and do anything I can to make sure that our voice is heard," he said.

"Sometimes in science you feel a bit isolated, but when you're part of a march like this you see that there's many people that really care." Samuel Stupp, Northwestern University

Signs from the March for Science in Chicago, April 22, 2017KERRY GRENS"Get up! Get down! Chicago is a science town! —Chants during the March for Science

Signs from the March for Science in Chicago, April 22, 2017KERRY GRENSSigns from the March for Science in Chicago, April 22, 2017KERRY GRENS

See “Science March Sights and Signs


Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: True Scientist

True Scientist

Posts: 59

April 24, 2017

Seems like science advocates should thank the democratic candidate because "the event would not have happened had Hillary Clinton won the election".

Avatar of: Paul Stein

Paul Stein

Posts: 237

Replied to a comment from True Scientist made on April 24, 2017

April 27, 2017

Pretty nonsensical remark.  The entire event was a huge waste of time, effort, and money in that it forced hundreds of thousands around the World to state the idiocy and futility of the current U.S. Presidential Administration backed by its so-called science-denying ilk.  Those "science deniers" are actually science attackers because they feel science will hurt their economic interests.  Their activities are perfectly understandable in a Capitalistic economic society.  The one problem with the March is that it did not show that the solutions to the problems that will only be worse in the future, especially global warming, are readily available through science and engineering, and these solutions will have a massive economic upside for smart investors who significantly modify their 20th century technology portfolios.  In other words, scientific advancement will allow a total rethinking of long-held economic beliefs, as it always has, so more money will be made...more than anyone could dream, as it always has.  When scientists learn to think and speak economically primarily, instead of falling back to the old we-don't-know-how-this-research-is-going-to-help-but-it-usually-does speech, then and only then will the general public, and Congress, listen.  It's all about the money and the making thereof.  Right now, an elite few want to force science to stop in place so it helps only them economically.  Everyone needs to wake up to the fact that this is stuhoopid for the majority.

Popular Now

  1. Can Young Stem Cells Make Older People Stronger?
  2. Thousands of Mutations Accumulate in the Human Brain Over a Lifetime
  3. Two Dozen House Republicans Do an About-Face on Tuition Tax
  4. CRISPR to Debut in Clinical Trials