Life Science Funding Cuts Leaked

According to a document posted online less than a day before the release of the official 2018 budget proposal, the National Institutes of Health could face even deeper cuts than previously suggested by the Trump administration.

By Jef Akst and Bob Grant | May 22, 2017

WIKIMEDIAOn Monday afternoon, details of proposed cuts to the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) appeared briefly online before being taken down—but not before screenshots were taken. The apparently leaked (or at least mistakenly posted) document detailed proposed cuts to HHS, including slashing the National Cancer Institute budget by $1 billion compared to the agency’s total 2017 budget and an overall cut of more than $7 billion for the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

This version of the Trump administration’s budget proposal will likely get a reception from science advocates and legislators on both sides of the isle that is just as icy as the reaction to the administration’s previous plan, released in March. “There’s no way Congress will take this seriously. Especially the NIH cut,” wrote Jennifer Zeitzer, a spokesperson for the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB), in an email to The Scientist. “Democrats and Republicans blasted the NIH cut when the ‘skinny budget’ came out in March, and this is actually worse, so I can’t imagine they will have anything nice to say about it.”

The latest budget proposal also suggests cutting several programs at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including an $82 million drop in funding for vaccine-preventable diseases, such as the flu and measles, and a $186 million cut from programs at the CDC’s center that handles tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and other infectious diseases.

Many details of the administration’s new proposal remain to be seen, however. “The only official version of the HHS budget will be released by the Office of Management and Budget at 11:00 AM tomorrow [May 23],” HHS national spokesperson Alleigh Marré wrote in an email to The Washington Post, which posted the screen capture of the leaked document. “At that time, Budget Director [Mick] Mulvaney will hold a press briefing and address any questions.”

Stay tuned to The Scientist for further coverage on this developing story.

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: A_Scientist


Posts: 18

May 23, 2017

If the Trump administration keeps the $2 billion NIH increase but mandates a decrease in the institutional overhead levels, Mr. Trump will be come an unlikely hero to most scientists (much to the chagrin of overpaid administrators).

Avatar of: mightythor


Posts: 85

May 23, 2017

I know government bookkeeping can be complicated, so I'm going to phrase this in the form of a question:  How did the "overall cut of more than $7 billion for the National Institutes of Health (NIH)", reported in the article, become the "$2 billion NIH increase" in A_Scientist's comment?  Anyone?

Avatar of: Mike Holloway

Mike Holloway

Posts: 29

May 23, 2017

" including an $82 million drop in funding for vaccine-preventable diseases"

Which only makes sense in the light of the Narcissist's belief that vaccines cause autism.

Popular Now

  1. Could Rapamycin Help Humans Live Longer?
  2. Renowned Physicist Stephen Hawking Dies
  3. Elena Rybak-Akimova, Chemical Kinetics Expert, Dies
  4. University of Oregon Erecting a $1-Billion Science Center