Surface of Mars Hostile to Microbes

Researchers confirm that chemicals present in the dust of the Red Planet are highly toxic to bacteria.

By Bob Grant | July 6, 2017

WIKIMEDIA, Y TAMBELife is a daunting prospect on the surface of our nearest planetary neighbor, Mars. Not only is the Red Planet cold, constantly bathed in ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and devoid of oxygen, a toxic chemical pervades Martian soils. Researchers at the University of Edinburgh have now confirmed that conditions on Mars—especially the presence of perchlorates, a form of chlorine—make it almost impossible for microbes to live on the surface of the planet. They published their results today in Scientific Reports.

“We knew before that any life would have an incredibly hard time to survive on the surface, and this study experimentally confirms that,” Dirk Schulze-Makuch, an astrobiologist at Washington State University who was not involved with the study, tells Popular Science.

Jennifer Wadsworth, a University of Edinburgh postdoc, and her adviser, astrobiologist Charles Cockell, subjected Bacillus subtilis, bacteria that commonly contaminate spacecraft, to Mars-like conditions in the lab. They found that when the microbes were exposed to perchlorates and then intense UV radiation, they all died within 30 seconds. Bacteria that were only exposed to the UV radiation died within 60 seconds. The bacterial cells fared a bit better when the researchers included silica disks, which simulated rocks, in the experiments.

This may mean that any microbes that existed on Mars when the planet harbored liquid water would have had a pretty tough time surviving, at least at the surface. “We don’t know exactly how far reaching the effect of UV and perchlorate would penetrate the surface layers, as the precise mechanism isn’t understood,” Wadsworth tells MailOnline. “If it’s the case of altered forms of perchlorate (such as chlorite or hypochlorite) diffusing through the environment, that might extend the uninhabitable zone. We may have to dig a little deeper to find a potential habitable environment.”

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You



Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo


Avatar of: The C Man

The C Man

Posts: 1

July 7, 2017

I'm not worried about what is on the surface of Mars as long as it isn't brought back to this planet. It sounds too much like an experiment to cure some form of plague gone wrong which could have decimated Mars. Even a microscopic amount brought back to this planet could spread and contaminate the our environment and sign our own death warrant.

Avatar of: JonRichfield


Posts: 139

Replied to a comment from The C Man made on July 7, 2017

July 7, 2017

Shades of H.G.Wells' brilliant "The War of the Worlds" hm?

Personally I don't take the prospect seriously, and we can in any case no more assume that Martian microbes or other life forms are sensitive to chlorates and related radicles, than that Earth microbes are all sensitive to oxygen, as indeed our remote ancestors largely were. But that such insensitive Martian microbes could survive in our searing Earth temperatures, moisture, and ubiquitous predatory microbes, is a big ask.

Conversely, I regard the observation as welcome. I never took the risk of contamination of Mars with Earth bacteria very seriously, but now I am confident that any stray germs on our equipment or pioneers would not survive there whether there is indigenous life on the planet or not.

Popular Now

  1. Prominent Salk Institute Scientist Inder Verma Resigns
  2. Anheuser-Busch Won’t Fund Controversial NIH Alcohol Study
  3. North American Universities Increasingly Cancel Publisher Packages
  4. CRISPR Efficiency Tied to Cancer-Causing Process