A recent toast to James Watson highlights a tolerance for bigotry many want excised from the scientific community.
Fifty years ago, Arthur Kornberg announced to reporters that his team had synthesized functional DNA.
December 1, 2017|
CHUCK PAINTER/STANFORD NEWS SERVICE
Arthur Kornberg’s discovery of DNA polymerase in the 1950s was one of the most fundamental contributions to the newly born field of molecular biology, one that allowed him to make strings of nucleotides identical to a template and to show, essentially, how life itself is assembled.
The finding garnered Kornberg a Nobel Prize, shared with Severo Ochoa, in 1959. Yet, as he wrote in a 1989 memoir in The Scientist, there was still a piece missing from the scientific story. “For more than 10 years, I had to find excuses at the end of every seminar to explain why the DNA product had no biologic activity. If the template had been copied accurately, why were we unsuccessful in all our attempts to multiply the transforming factor activity of DNA from Pneumococcus, Hemophilus, and Bacillus species?”
The missing ingredient, it turned out, was another enzyme: a DNA ligase. In 1967, 37-year-old Mehran Goulian had been experimenting with ligases, which had been recently discovered by other groups, and DNA polymerase in Kornberg’s lab at Stanford University. Using the two enzymes, Goulian found he could convert the single-stranded, circular genome of a bacteriophage, ΦX174, into the double-stranded form, as happens within an infected bacterium, where the phage commandeers its host’s enzymes. Then, with the help of Robert Sinsheimer at Caltech, Goulian and Kornberg showed that the newly synthesized genome could infect E. coli and behave just like the natural virus.
Goulian, Kornberg, and Sinsheimer published their work in PNAS that year, and Kornberg, with Goulian by his side, held a press conference on December 14 to announce their achievement. “He was responding to a widespread concern at that time about the availability of funds for scientific research, especially basic research,” Goulian, now a professor emeritus at the University of California, San Diego, tells The Scientist in an email. “Kornberg hoped that a press conference about this research would increase the level of discussion and appreciation by the American public of accomplishments in government-funded research.”
Indeed, the results garnered publicity, but not in the way Kornberg had anticipated. According to Errol Friedberg’s biography of Kornberg, Emperor of Enzymes, he had wanted to squelch any suggestion that he had created life. Yet, at an event at the Smithsonian Institution that day, President Lyndon Johnson, who had been briefed about the study, made an off-the-cuff remark about it to his audience. “That evening the Kornberg/Goulian experiments were the lead story on the televised news,” Friedberg writes, “which featured the President extemporaneously stating: ‘Some geniuses at Stanford University have created life in the test tube!’”
Questions about manipulating and creating life have not abated in the decades since Goulian and Kornberg synthesized the bacteriophage genome. And their work provided the foundation for much of modern genomic tinkering.
“After so many years of trying, we had finally done it,” Kornberg wrote in The Scientist. “The way was open to create novel DNA and genes by manipulating the building blocks and their templates.”