Max Planck Society Seeks to Keep More Women as Faculty

The German research institution will invest more than $35 million in creating tenure-track positions for female scientists. 

By | December 6, 2017

ISTOCK, SANJERILast month (November 16), Germany’s renowned Max Planck Society launched a women-only hiring initiative to help tackle the underrepresentation of women in scientific research. Over the next four years, the society will put more than $35 million (€30 million) towards the “Lise Meitner excellence program”—named after the distinguished 20th-century chemist.

The program will create up to 10 positions for leading scientists. These will be tenure-track, meaning that participants will be given the chance to make their positions permanent at the end of the program.

A European Commission report in 2015 showed that while women represent nearly half of all PhD graduates, they represent only 21 percent of female researchers at the highest level.

Grietje Molema, president of the Dutch Network of Women Professors and a professor at the University of Groningen, tells Times Higher Education that affirmative action is an “essential part” of closing the gender gap in academic research, and explains that the number of such women-only programs is increasing in Europe. Max Planck’s program is a “good step forward,” she says.

Louise Morley, director of the Center for Higher Education and Equity Research at the University of Sussex, agrees that such programs would help solve the problem. “Any positive discrimination intervention is always controversial as critics argue that it is in opposition to merit,” she tells Times Higher Education. “However, when any social group is so under-represented, some focused actions are necessary.”

The move was also intended to deter other institutions from poaching Max Planck’s top female scientists. “Other institutions recruit the best of our female scientists at group leader level,” Christina Beck, a spokeswoman for the Max Planck Institute, tells Times Higher Education.

Gender bias in science is not solely an issue of representation of women in research positions, but there also appear to be similar biases when it comes to science publishing, salaries, and research citations

Add a Comment

Avatar of: You

You

Processing...
Processing...

Sign In with your LabX Media Group Passport to leave a comment

Not a member? Register Now!

LabX Media Group Passport Logo

Comments

Avatar of: Monodb

Monodb

Posts: 11

December 7, 2017

I would grant an award to the MPS for initiating this affirmative action. That is a symbol of the start. Humankind will be well on its way to gender equity when no new money is necessary for gender equity to be in place.

Popular Now

  1. How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body
    Daily News How Gaining and Losing Weight Affects the Body

    Millions of measurements from 23 people who consumed extra calories every day for a month reveal changes in proteins, metabolites, and gut microbiota that accompany shifts in body mass.

  2. That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute
    Daily News That Other CRISPR Patent Dispute

    The Broad Institute and Rockefeller University disagree over which scientists should be named as inventors on certain patents involving the gene-editing technology.

  3. EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent
    The Nutshell EPO Revokes Broad’s CRISPR Patent

    Shortly after ruling out the earliest priority dates on a foundational patent for CRISPR gene-editing technology, the European Patent Office rescinded the patent entirely—and more are likely to follow.

  4. Learning Opens the Genome
    Daily News Learning Opens the Genome

    Researchers map learning-induced chromatin alterations in mouse brain cells, and find that many affect autism-associated genes.

AAAS