The nationwide experiment will initially include around 100,000 volunteers.
Eight papers by Suchitra Sumitran-Holgersson, a tissue engineer at the University of Gothenburg, have been flagged for image manipulation.
March 21, 2018|
WIKIMEDIA, AXTAn investigation by Sweden’s Central Ethical Review Board (CEPN) has concluded that eight papers coauthored by Suchitra Sumitran-Holgersson, a professor of tissue engineering at the University of Gothenburg, contained evidence of misconduct, Retraction Watch reports.
CEPN’s report, which was published last week (March 15), states that the articles contained problematic images and notes that there were issues with the researcher’s laboratory environment. “A large number of images have been reused, enlarged, faded, or rotated incorrectly, and there are . . . manipulations of images,” the report notes (translated from Swedish with Google Translate). “The expert group concludes that the case shows systematic shortcomings in the composition and function of the research group and an almost dysfunctional research environment . . . This circumstance is probably one of the main reasons for the shortcomings [the] research shows.
“There is yet no formal verdict in this matter,” Sumitran-Holgersson tells Retraction Watch. “I admit carelessness in the preparation of these manuscript[s], and I take the full responsibility for the mistakes. I categorically deny any willful manipulation of data.”
According to Retraction Watch, the University of Gothenburg had previously found signs of misconduct in two papers by Sumitran-Holgersson and Michael Olausson, one of her frequent coauthors and another scientist at the university.
Sumitran-Holgersson cofounded Verigraft, a biotech company working on personalized transplants that hired Olausson in 2008, according to For Better Science. The firm, which was formerly called NovaHep, recently received a €2 million grant from the E.U. to develop its technology.
March 21, 2018
If I may. It was not Retraction watch who broke the news, but I, last Sunday, March 18th, as soon as I received the Swedish report, which I then google-translated and published the same day.
March 21, 2018
I now updated my article with an English version of the CEPN report I just received. You can read it there, or soon on Retraction Watch.
Regarding this Retraction Watch article you mentioned, about the earlier misconduct findings:
That was also not really original, and appeared after own reporting here: https://forbetterscience.com/2017/03/31/sumitran-holgersson-and-olausson-guilty-of-misconduct-and-unethical-experiments-on-children/
I tried back then to point out over Twitter to RW that Michael Olausson is not a biologist, but surgeon. Biologists do not operate patients. But there, RW considered my evidence unreliable.