When the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool turned green with algae just days after a $15 million renovation, the US government scrambled for chemicals and expensive technical solutions to fix the iconic landmark.
Trying to kill algae with chemicals is a common response when community ponds or other water features go green. But as a scientist who studies freshwater ecology, I can tell you there are better solutions that cost far less, last longer and carry less risk of harm to pets and wildlife.
Rather than battling against nature, these alternatives work with nature for long-term solutions.1
What Went Wrong on the National Mall
The algal bloom that turned the Reflecting Pool a vibrant green shouldn’t have been a surprise.
The pool is big, more than a third of a mile long and around 165 feet wide. But it’s shallow, meaning it warms up quickly in the sun. When it was repainted “American flag blue” during the renovations in spring 2026, the new color darkened the pool, and darker colors absorb more heat.
On top of those conditions, the pool was refilled with water from the nutrient-rich tidal basin of the Potomac River. The combination of warm water and nutrients created prime conditions for algae to bloom, turning the water pea soup green.
As the national conversation over the Reflecting Pool shifts to political finger-pointing, an important environmental question deserves careful scrutiny: What is the best approach to maintain water quality in a case like this, whether for a national monument or a community water feature or pond?
Trying to chemically or mechanically remove algae can damage the structure of a water feature and may harm species in the water that could actually help solve the problem.
Importantly, chemical and mechanical solutions are only temporary fixes. When the Reflecting Pool is drained and filled again, there’s a good chance that algae will bloom again.
Natural Algae Control
Limnologists – scientists like me who study inland water bodies – have spent many decades learning why lakes and ponds turn green and how to clear them up.
Often, nutrient-rich waters fueled by fertilizer runoff from farm fields or sewage from cities are the sources that stimulate algal growth.
However, natural ponds also host grazing zooplankton, which eat algae. For example, a type of zooplankton called Daphnia, known as water fleas because of the way these tiny crustaceans swim, can control algae by consuming it before it becomes a pea soup nuisance. Thus, a thriving Daphnia population can help maintain good water quality in a lake, pond or community water feature, even when nutrient levels spike.2
In addition to being highly effective grazers, Daphnia have another superpower – they can evolve rapidly.3 Urban waterbodies are often harsh environments with a variety of challenges, including high temperatures, low levels of dissolved oxygen, and pollutants. Daphnia can adapt to tough conditions, making these creatures an ideal source of algae control in many urban ponds.4
Rooted aquatic plants are also useful for algae control in ponds because they absorb nutrients. Thus, shallow ponds with thick beds of aquatic plants can often resist algal blooms when nutrient levels rise.5
Why Draining Might Not Be the Best Solution
One downside to draining and refilling a pond or urban water feature to try to clean it is that doing so resets the aquatic ecosystem, erasing the signature of any past evolution that has taken place.
Imagine Daphnia in a shallow pond that experiences periodic heat waves throughout the summer. Through repeated exposure to high temperatures, natural selection favors heat-resistant genotypes that can thrive in an urban pond.
Daphnia and other grazing zooplankton can also evolve resistance to some types of cyanobacteria, also known as blue-green algae, which produce compounds that are toxic to people and pets.6,7 Daphnia that evolve resistance to those toxins can help control harmful cyanobacterial blooms.8
If a Daphnia population that evolved to tolerate warm temperatures, low oxygen levels or cyanotoxins is removed, the new population likely won’t be ready to handle those local challenges. This evolutionarily naive population will perform poorly in its new environment, reducing its effectiveness at controlling algal blooms.
As a result, traditional mechanical and chemical approaches may actually work against the goal of minimizing algae in ponds and other water features.
Nature-Based Solutions
The use of Daphnia to control algal blooms is just one example of solving environmental challenges with nature-based solutions.1
Growing urban forests to provide cooling and improve air quality to help reduce the need for more energy-intensive air conditioning is another example. Maintaining urban wetlands can help reduce flooding, protect property and recharge groundwater more effectively and for less money than building and maintaining levees. Coastal marshes similarly reduce erosion, buffer storm surges and support fisheries.
All these urban ecosystems protect biodiversity and support human health and well-being.9
From national landmarks to city parks and backyard ponds, projects of all sizes can take advantage of nature-based solutions. While each specific project is unique, some general principles apply.
Ecosystems are most resilient when they are diverse and connected. So, it is beneficial to use a variety of species and genotypes and provide corridors that support the movement of organisms and their beneficial genes.10,11
Urban climates are changing rapidly, so it helps to use species and genotypes that will thrive under future conditions, including rising temperatures.12
Not Every Solution Has To Be Engineered
The hubbub over the Reflecting Pool holds a mirror up to assumptions about how to solve pressing environmental challenges. The idea of just engineering one’s way out of any environmental crisis has limits.
Understanding ecology and nature’s mechanisms of ecosystem resilience can achieve sustainable solutions that benefit both nature and people.
Eric Palkovacs, Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
- Alberti M, et al. Evolving nature-based solutions for urban resilience. Science. 2026;392:701-708.
- Vanni MJ. Biological control of nuisance algae by Daphnia pulex: Experimental studies. Lake and Reservoir Management. 1984;1(1):151-156.
- Miner BE, et al. Linking genes to communities and ecosystems: Daphnia as an ecogenomic model. Proc Biol Sci. 2012;279(1735):1873-1882.
- Brans KI, De Meester L. City life on fast lanes: Urbanization induces an evolutionary shift towards a faster lifestyle in the water flea Daphnia. Funct Ecol. 2018;32:2225-2240.
- Srivastava J, et al. Managing water quality with aquatic macrophytes. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2008;7:255-266.
- Jiang X, et al. Rapid evolution of tolerance to toxic Microcystis in two cladoceran grazers. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25319.
- Wood R. Acute animal and human poisonings from cyanotoxin exposure — A review of the literature. Environment International. 2016;91:276-282.
- Fajgenblat M, et al. Rapid temporal adaptation structures tolerance to toxic cyanobacteria in a natural population of the water flea Daphnia. Evolution Letters. 2025;9(5):548-557.
- Van den Bosch M, Sang AO. Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research. 2017;158:373-384.
- Des Roches S, et al. Conserving intraspecific variation for nature’s contributions to people. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021;5:574-582.
- Christie MR, Knowles LL. Habitat corridors facilitate genetic resilience irrespective of species dispersal abilities or population sizes. Evol Appl. 2015;8:454-463.
- Aitken SN, Whitlock MC. Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annual Review Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2013;44:367-388.
