Skip to main content

American Cancer Society Updates Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines

The new recommendations highlight blood-based and at-home stool tests that may help reduce barriers to screening and improve participation.

Written byLaura Tran, PhD
| 2 min read
Image of the doctor explaining colonoscopy exam results with a patient.
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer and mortality in the United States. While the overall rate of people being diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer has dropped since the mid-1980s, in part due to the American Cancer Society (ACS)’s commitment to championing screening guidelines to reduce incidence and mortality, a new and unsettling trend has emerged.1

CRC incidence has risen sharply among adults younger than 65 years old. In 2018, in response to early-onset CRC, the ACS updated their guidelines to lower the recommended screening age for individuals at average risk from 50 to 45 years old.

The 2026 updated report, published in CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, reaffirmed the recommended screening strategies, including visual examinations—such as a colonoscopy, the gold standard—and computed tomography colonography, as well as stool-based tests.2 Now, the updated guidelines included improved and newer tests for at-home multi-target stool testing, which identify specific DNA or RNA markers (mt-sDNA and mt-sRNA) and hemoglobin, and blood-based screening assays designed to detect tumor DNA.

“No matter which test you choose, what’s most important is to get screened, and that includes underserved, rural, and minority populations,” said William Dahut, chief scientific officer at the ACS, in a press release. “These changes were developed to add to the colorectal cancer screening arsenal and help ensure preventive cancer care is available to all.”

Continue reading below...

Like this story? Sign up for FREE Cancer updates:

Latest science news storiesTopic-tailored resources and eventsCustomized newsletter content
Subscribe

A multidisciplinary team of volunteers, comprising clinicians, methodologists, public health experts, and patient representatives, developed and updated these guidelines. Notably, they presented evidence that the newly available mt-sRNA test and the updated, next-generation mt-sDNA test exhibited similar accuracy to the original multi-target stool test, suggesting that either is an appropriate screening option.3

The blood-based screening tests detected advanced precancerous lesions with low sensitivity.4 However, the report noted that, compared with stool-based tests, blood-based tests have reduced sensitivity for detecting these lesions and stage I cancers so are therefore not currently the preferred screening options. Additionally, the effectiveness of both stool-based and blood-based screening tests depends on timely follow-up after a positive result, with a colonoscopy ideally being performed within six months to complete the screening process.

While there is no single preferred test for all individuals, the authors emphasized that the most effective screening test is the one that the patient completes. “We need to increase our emphasis on colorectal cancer as a highly preventable disease as much as a treatable one,” added Robert Smith, a cancer epidemiologist and senior vice president of Early Cancer Detection Science at the ACS, in a press release. With this expanded arsenal of tools, the authors hope to close the screening gap and catch more cancers at an earlier and more treatable stage.

  1. Eddy D. Cancer of the colon and rectum. CA Cancer J Clin. 1980;30(4):208‐215.
  2. Wolf AMD, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: An update to the American Cancer Society guideline, 2026. CA Cancer J Clin. 2026;76(3):e70083.
  3. Imperiale TF, et al. Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal‐cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1287‐1297.
  4. Chung DC, et al. A cell-free DNA blood-based test for colorectal cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(11):973-983.
Add The Scientist as a preferred source on Google

Add The Scientist as a preferred Google source to see more of our trusted coverage.

Meet the Author

  • Laura Tran, PhD

    Laura Tran is an Associate Editor, Content & Newsletters at The Scientist. She has a background in microbiology. Laura earned her PhD in integrated biomedical sciences from Rush University, studying how circadian rhythms and alcohol impact the gut. While completing her studies, she wrote for the Chicago Council on Science and Technology and participated in ComSciCon Chicago in 2022. In 2023, Laura became a science communication fellow with OMSI, continuing her passion for accessible science storytelling.

    View Full Profile

Related Topics

You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
You might also be interested in...
Loading Next Article...
The Scientist Digest cover September 2026
September 2026

Multiplex Microscopy Becomes Easier with Encoded Antibodies

A new system that enables researchers to uniquely tag monoclonal antibodies for use in microscopy could help simplify complex imaging studies.

View this Issue
Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

Essential Genes Are Dominantly Activated by Single Transcription Factors

EpiCypher Logo
Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Rethinking ALS Biomarkers: From Discovery to Clinical Impact

Alamar Biosciences logo
Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Engineering CAR-Neutrophils In Vivo to Target Glioblastoma

Miltenyi
Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Best Practices for qPCR Assay Design and Optimization

Bio-Rad

Products

Closeup image of a multi channel pipette dispensing pink liquid into a 96-well plate.

The ASSIST PLUS pipetting robot for affordable workflow automation

Integra Logo
Single cells in suspension

Rapidly isolate primary cells and make uniform single-cell suspensions with Corning® Cell Strainers

Corning logo
Abstract image representing cell membranes linked together.

CellBrite® Steady Membrane Stain: Cell surface staining built for real-time imaging

Biotium
sino biological logo

Monod Bio Licenses AI-designed Protein Technologies to SignalChem Biotech for Custom Discovery Assays