Cha vs. Flamm court drama continues

A fertility researcher who published a study suggesting that prayer improves in vitro fertilization success rates has renewed his legal battle against an obstetrician/gynecologist who has criticized his work. Kwang-Yul Cha, a fertility researcher and chancellor of the medical school at Pochon CHA University in Korea, filed a motion on Tuesday (Dec 18) for a new trial after a judge linkurl:threw out;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/53876/ his defamation lawsuit against University of Cal

Written byBob Grant
| 2 min read

Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
2:00
Share
A fertility researcher who published a study suggesting that prayer improves in vitro fertilization success rates has renewed his legal battle against an obstetrician/gynecologist who has criticized his work. Kwang-Yul Cha, a fertility researcher and chancellor of the medical school at Pochon CHA University in Korea, filed a motion on Tuesday (Dec 18) for a new trial after a judge linkurl:threw out;http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/53876/ his defamation lawsuit against University of California, Irvine, Ob/Gyn Bruce Flamm last month. The motion requests a new trial based on new evidence discovered by Cha's attorneys, who claim that Flamm's criticism constitutes a personal attack on Cha. __The Scientist__ obtained a copy of the motion, which highlights a DVD recording of Flamm delivering a speech in which he criticizes Cha's 2001 linkurl:study;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11584476&dopt=AbstractPlus linking prayer to in vitro fertilization success. Flamm delivered the speech at a convention held by linkurl:Atheist Alliance International;http://www.atheistalliance.org/ earlier this year, and according to Cha's motion, the lecture captures "Dr. Flamm's personal crusade against Dr. Cha and the 2001 prayer study." Cha's attorneys did not obtain the DVD until after the original suit was dropped in November, according to the motion. "I don't have a copy of the DVD but as I recall my talk was a humorous critique of the alleged 'miracle study' aimed at showing its absurdity," Flamm wrote in an Email to __The Scientist__. "In spite of the fact that Cha was first author of the physics-defying publication I think very little of the [Atheist Alliance Convention speech] focused on him." Cha linkurl:sued;http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/53709/ Flamm back in August over an linkurl:opinion piece;http://www.obgynnews.com/article/PIIS0029743707702021/fulltext the latter wrote in the March 15, 2007, issue of __Ob. Gyn. News__ outlining events surrounding the controversial IVF/prayer study. That suit centered on a single sentence Flamm wrote in reference to Cha and his two coauthors originally listed on the IVF/prayer study. The sentence read: "This may be the first time in history that all three authors of a randomized, controlled study have been found guilty of fraud, deception, and/or plagiarism." In the piece, Flamm also calls for the study's retraction from the __Journal of Reproductive Medicine__. Cha's spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Interested in reading more?

Become a Member of

The Scientist Logo
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member? Login Here

Meet the Author

  • From 2017 to 2022, Bob Grant was Editor in Chief of The Scientist, where he started in 2007 as a Staff Writer. Before joining the team, he worked as a reporter at Audubon and earned a master’s degree in science journalism from New York University. In his previous life, he pursued a career in science, getting a bachelor’s degree in wildlife biology from Montana State University and a master’s degree in marine biology from the College of Charleston in South Carolina. Bob edited Reading Frames and other sections of the magazine.

    View Full Profile
Share
Image of a woman with her hands across her stomach. She has a look of discomfort on her face. There is a blown up image of her stomach next to her and it has colorful butterflies and gut bacteria all swarming within the gut.
November 2025, Issue 1

Why Do We Feel Butterflies in the Stomach?

These fluttering sensations are the brain’s reaction to certain emotions, which can be amplified or soothed by the gut’s own “bugs".

View this Issue
Olga Anczukow and Ryan Englander discuss how transcriptome splicing affects immune system function in lung cancer.

Long-Read RNA Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role for Splicing in Immunotherapy Responses

Pacific Biosciences logo
Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Research Roundtable: The Evolving World of Spatial Biology

Conceptual cartoon image of gene editing technology

Exploring the State of the Art in Gene Editing Techniques

Bio-Rad
Conceptual image of a doctor holding a brain puzzle, representing Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

Simplifying Early Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis with Blood Testing

fujirebio logo

Products

Eppendorf Logo

Research on rewiring neural circuit in fruit flies wins 2025 Eppendorf & Science Prize

Evident Logo

EVIDENT's New FLUOVIEW FV5000 Redefines the Boundaries of Confocal and Multiphoton Imaging

Evident Logo

EVIDENT Launches Sixth Annual Image of the Year Contest

10x Genomics Logo

10x Genomics Launches the Next Generation of Chromium Flex to Empower Scientists to Massively Scale Single Cell Research