The initial draft of the Environmental Protection Agency?s first-ever rule on human testing of pesticides has drawn sharp criticism from public interest groups, members of Congress, and scientists within the agency itself, who argue that the law would not protect vulnerable groups.The rule ?looks like it was written by the American Chemical Council,? Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, told The Scientist.The EPA issued the 30-page draft last September after Congress suspended human testing of pesticides in August, until appropriate legislation was in place to protect test subjects. The final version of the rule is due by the end of this month.Ruch and other critics say the draft leaves the door open to unethical conduct. ?I am somewhat dismayed that this rule was presented in such a complex -- and I would have to say, tricky -- way,? said Suzanne Wuerthele, a regional toxicologist...
American Federation of Government Employees2004 reportCropLife America2001 studyAnne_harding@yahoo.comhttp://www.peer.org/http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/guidance/human-test.htmhttp://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/21002/http://www.afge.org/Index.cfmhttp://www.nap.edu/books/0309091721/htmlhttp://www.croplifeamerica.org/PM_ID: 11350206
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!
Already a member?