A new report from the National Research Council's Committee to Review the National Nanotechnology Initiative delivers a mostly positive review of the initiative's progress in overseeing the government's role in developing nanotechnologies. However, the report also points to places where improvement would be possible, including determining the potential safety risks associated with nanomaterials and tracking economic returns on federal funding.The committee's first triennial review, requested by Congress, praised the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) for its efforts in coordinating nanotechnology research and development across government agencies. However, the report calls for expanding research funds to establish safety standards for workers, consumers, and the environment. "The body of published research addressing the toxicological and environmental effects of engineered nanomaterials is still relatively small," the report states. Committee chair James Williams, a professor at Ohio State University, said, "There is some concern that the effort nationally?I don't know whether it's fair to...
E. Clayton Teague reportAndrew Maynard email@example.com http://www.nas.edu/nrc/http://www.nano.govhttp://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/15659/#23843http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11752.html http://www.matsceng.ohio-state.edu/fac_res/faculty/williams/index.htmlxhttp://www.nsti.org/outreach/NNCO http://www.nano.gov/NNI_EHS_research_needs.pdfhttp://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?topic_id=166192&fuseaction=topics.profile&person_id=166223
Interested in reading more?
Become a Member of
Receive full access to more than 35 years of archives, as well as TS Digest, digital editions of The Scientist, feature stories, and much more!